Andhra Pradesh Court July 2000 Judgments
M. Janaki Ramulu Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Mahabubnag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD95; 2000(5)ALT89
ORDER1. Having heard Sri M.P. Chandramouli, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise and Sri R. Subhash Reddy, learned Counsel for caveator-Respondents 2 to 6, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposed of at the stage of admission.2. By the proceedings dated 22-4-2000 (impugned herein) the 1st respondent in purported exercise of the powers under Section 32(7)(a) of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act') appointed respondents 2 to 6 as 'Persons Committee' to the Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society Ltd., Gadwal, for a period of six months or till the elections are held, whichever is earlier.3. Under the aegis of the petitioner as the Chief Promoter the Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society Gadwal was accorded provisional registration under the provisions of the Act on 19-2-1999. The petitionerwas appointed as the Chief promoter and was the President of the committee appointed to conduct the affairs of the...
Tag this Judgment!NaimuddIn Ahmed Nirwana and Another Vs. Indian Bank, Hyderabad and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD276; 2000(5)ALT242
1. This appeal is filed against the decree and judgment dated 27-8-1983 in OS No. 162 of 1982 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge-cum I Additional Special Judge for SPE/ACB cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The appellants herein arc the Defendants 1 and 2 and the first respondent is the plaintiff and the 2nd respondent is the defendant No.3 in the suit. For the sake of convenience the parties as arrayed in the suit are referred herein.3. The plaintiff bank filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,62,228-54 towards the loan advanced to the first defendant for the purchase of a lorry recoverable jointly and severally from all the three defendants and for the sale of hypothecated vehicle mentioned in the schedule and for the interest in the suit amount at the contract rate and for costs of the suit.4. The averments in the plaint are that the plaintiff is a Nationalised bank and the third defendant is a Co-operative Societyregistered under the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 (her...
Tag this Judgment!A.S. Girish Vs. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)ALD89; 2001(2)ALT217
ORDER1. The petitioners in these three writ petitions, who are working in various Departments of S.V. College of Music and Dance for over a decade, filed these writ petitions seeking regularisation of their services and for payment of time scales of pay attached to the posts to them.2. The said college was started by Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams about two decades back. Sri A.S. Girish, petitioner in WP No.5593 of 1996, was appointed as a Lecturer in Vocal Music on 13-9-1991 due to the retirement of the incumbent on 24-2-1987, that is nearly after four years of the retirement of the incumbent, on part time basis without notifying the vacancy and without filling up the vacancy on regular basis even at that length of time. Since that date, the petitioner is working in that capacity at a remuneration of Rs.20/-per hour.3. Sri K. Veera Narayana, petitioner in WP No. 14578 of 1996, was appointed as a Flute Lecturer on 2-12-1991 in a vacancy that had arisen as the incumbent left the servic...
Tag this Judgment!Salar Jung Museum Vs. Atiya Talat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD70; 2000(5)ALT557
ORDER1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 26^6-2000passed in IA No.345 of 2000 in OS No.173 of 1995 on the file of V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. In the said IA the prayer of the respondent who is the defendant in the suit is that the evidence of the plaintiff may be treated as closed and a witness proposed to be examined on behalf of the plaintiff as PW2 may not be permitted to be examined.3. The instant Interlocutory application proceeds on the ground that the proposed witness who happens to be the husband of the plaintiff (who has been examined as PW1) is also the GPA of the said plaintiff. The contention is that a GPA of the plaintiff cannot be allowed to be examined as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff.4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner herein contends that this view is supported by a judgment of this Court in K, Bharathy v. Authority Under Section 50 of APSE Act-Cum-Labour Officer, : 1999(3)ALD420 . The argument of th...
Tag this Judgment!Land Acquisition Officer, Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda Vs. V. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD372; 2000(6)ALT683
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State against the common judgment passed in OPNo.10 of 1989, on 16th April, 199) by the learned Subordinate Judge, Suryapet.2. The Land Acquisition Officer-appellant herein acquired the Ac. 1.20 guntas of land of the claimants situated in B. Madaram of Suryapet town. After due draft notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act published on 1-8-1978, the Land Acquisition Officer having held the enquiry passed the award and fixed the market value of the same at the rate of Rs.7,500/- per acre. Having dissatisfied with the same, the claimants-respondents herein sought reference to the civil Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.3. Before the trial Court, the claimants respondents herein examined PWs.1 to 3 and marked Exs.A1 to A34. None were examined on behalf of the Land Acquisition Officer. However, Ex.B1 award was marked. After considering the entire evidence and the material on record, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Zee Telefilms Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecuto ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)351; [2000]39CLA173(AP); [2002]110CompCas884(AP)
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in S.T.C.No.7 of 2000 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are the accused in the said case. 2. The second respondent herein filed a complaint before the learned Special Judge against the petitioners herein for the offence punishable under Section 113 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'). It may be necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts before adverting to the question as to whether the petitioners are entitled for any relief in this petition. 3. The parties herein shall be referred to as arrayed in the complaint. 4. A1 is a Public Limited Company having its registered office at Mumbai; A2 is the Chairman of A1 Company; A3 is the Managing Director, A4 to A6 are the Directors and A7 is the Company Secretary of A1 Company. It is the case of the complainant that he had purchas...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of India Vs. Sri Veera Hanuman Rice and Flour Mill and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALT295
ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order 11-9-1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramachandrapuram dismissing the I.A. No. 1079 of 1994 filed by the petitioner-Bank to condone the delay of 714 days in filing the petition for passing of final decree in O.S. No. 93 of 1987.2. This Court by an order dated 29th June, 1999 allowed the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the impugned order. The delay was condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- to the learned Counsel for the respondents within six weeks from the date of the order. The Respondents herein carried the matter to the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2896 of 2000. The Supreme Court of India by its order dated 24-4-2000 set aside the order passed by this Court in C.R.P. No. 610 of 1998 and remitted the same for fresh disposal by this Court after considering the contention of the appellants therein with reference to the appearance in Court of the Legal Advisor...
Tag this Judgment!Bandi Prakash Vs. Superintendent, Central Prison and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-2000
Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)508; 2000(5)ALT146
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. The petitioner herein, Bandi Prakash, son of B. Ramaiah, convict No. 7893, lodged in Central Prison, Chenchalguda, Hyderabad, has filed the present writ petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following averments: That he is a life convict undergoing the sentence of life imprisonment at Chenchalguda Central Prison, Hyderabad as convict No. 7893. The Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad, convicted him for life in Sessions Case No. 317 of 1987 on 21-4-1994 in connection with Crime No. 79 of 1984 of Mandamarri Police Station, Adilabad District.2. It is further averred by the petitioner that the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O. Ms. No. 193 and released as many as 289 lifers who underwent 7 years of imprisonment and 10 years of imprisonment with remissions on the occasion of 'Golden Jubilee of the Country's Independence Day i.e., on 15-8-1997'.3. It is the further case of the petitioner th...
Tag this Judgment!S. Ramanjulu Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Offic ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD440; 2000(5)ALT493
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J 1. Allthese appeals are filed challenging the common order passed in OP Nos.47, 67, 68, 85 and 86 of 1989, dated 23-7-1999 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.2. The claimants are the appellants herein. The land approximately in an extent of Ac.61.46 cents in Sy. Nos.6, 13, 17 and 31 of Yerramreddipalem village of Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District was acquired by the Government by issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the 'Act'), dated 30-12-1976 for the purpose of extension of industrialdevelopment area called A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC). The declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published on 14-4-1977. Since the extent of the land acquired is a plain sheet of land without any marks of boundaries by ridges etc., survey of the fields was taken up by the Government within the boundaries proposed for acquisition and the correct extent as per the survey came to Ac.57-41 cents. Acc...
Tag this Judgment!Talari Rajanna and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD185; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)501
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. The accused Nos.1 to 7 in Sessions Case No.434 of 1996, which was decided by the Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad are appellants herein. The accused-appellants are tried for five charges.2. The first charge against accused Nos.1 to 7 was under Section 148 IPC. The learned Judge found them guilty, and therefore, they were convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years, and to pay fine of Rs.100/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months. The second charge against accused Nos.1 to 4 was under Section 302 IPC simplicitor. The learned Judge did not record any conviction against them. The third charge against accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 was under Section 307 IPC for attempting to cause the death of PW1. The learned Judge found them guilty of an offence punishable under Section 324 read with 149 IPC and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.100/- each, in default to suffer rig...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »