Andhra Pradesh Court June 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Executive Officer, M.S.N. Charities, Kakinada Vs. Pilla Ramarao and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD284; 2000(3)ALT663
ORDERM.S. Liberhan, CJ 1. The petitioner a charitable institution (hereinafter referred to as 'landlord') applied for resumption of half of the wet leasehold land for personal cultivation under section 12 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tenancy Act') from the respondent (hereinafter referred to as 'tenant'). Tenant was in possession of 21 acres and 64 cents. Lease commenced in the year 1957.2. The tenant objected to the resumption, inter alia, on the ground that the petition is barred by time. It lacked bona fides. There is non-compliance of Rule 5 of the Andhra Pradesh (A.A) Tenancy Rules, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as 'Tenancy Rules'), as the petition is not accompanied by the certified extract of village record showing the location and extent of the entire holding held by the landlord and the cultivating tenant. The maintainability of the petition was challenged.3. The Special Officer held: (i) The ejectment was sought in goo...
Sulochana Vs. Apsrtc, Hyd. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD278; 2000(3)ALT634; [2000(86)FLR834]
ORDER1. As a forward step the State of Andhra Pradesh and State Road Transport Corporation (RTC) recruited Women Bus Conductors. The post of Conductor of a bus till now was considered to be a male job, but the progressive step by the State and its RTC enabled many women like the petitioner to get appointed to the post of Conductor.2. The petitioner was appointed on 16-7-1996. As a pre-appointment condition she underwent medical examination. She was found to be medically fit. She worked for about an year when she was terminated by an order-dated 28-4-1997 while she was working under the control of the Depot Manager, Barkatpura. She filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent who by an order dated 4-6-1997 set aside the order of removal and ordered reinstatement as Conductor Grade III on daily wage basis.3. After the orders of the 2nd respondent the petitioner was sent for medical examination. She .appeared for medical examination on 12-6-1997 and she was declared unfit for the post of Con...
Asst. Director of Sericulture, Shadnagar, Mahaboobnagar Dist. Vs. G. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD121; 2000(4)ALT656
ORDER1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Shadnagar filed this writ petition questioning the award of the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad in I.D.No.51292 dated 28-7-1993 wherein the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the 1st respondent without back wages having recorded a finding that the termination of the 1st respondent is in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.2. In the normal course, I would have adjusdicated this matter on merits and passed the order. But because of the events that have taken place in this case and the way the public monies are squandered away at a time when the State is starving of funds, I may refer to the events that have taken place so that the Hon'ble Chief Minister may try to take necessary steps to safeguard the public monies without wasting them in this manner.3. This Court admitted the writ petition on 19-1-1994 and in WPMPNo.528 of 1994 the award of the Labour Court was suspended by the order of even date. Subsequently, the 1st ...
Apsrtc. Rep. by Its Vice-chairman and Managing Director Vs. Transport ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALT139
ORDERM.S. Liberhan, C.J.1. This Writ Appeal by the Appellant - A.P. State Road Transport Corporation is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the Corporation.2. The appellant filed the Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent and his subordinates in not stopping unauthorised vehicles plying from the notified route as arbitrary and illegal and contrary to Sections 86 and 207 of Motor Vehicles Act and for consequential directions. The learned Single Judge declined to issue the mandamus sought for and dismissed the writ petition following the decision of the Apex Court in Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. Collector of Central Excise, 1992 Supp. (2) SCC 432. The learned Single Judge, however, observed that it is desirable that the State Government constitute an appropriate committee for the purpose and the disputes arising between the Corporation and the State Department are better resolved amica...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›