Andhra Pradesh Court June 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abdul Rahman Bakran (Died) and Others Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD149; 2000(4)ALT618
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J1. Since these three appeals arise out of and against the judgment in OP No.89 of 1994, dated 20-8-1990 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Nizambad, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. AS Nos.674 and 1380 of 1992 are filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation; whereas AS No. 1606 of 1992 is filed by the State questioning the judgment of the lower Court, wherein the learned Judge confirmed the award made by the Land Acquisition Officer without any deduction towards developmental charges.3. In order to appreciate the rival contentions put forth on behalf of the parties, it is necessary to advert to the facts of the case in brief, which read: The State has acquired the lands of the claimants to an extent of Ac. 7.26 guntas comprised in Sy. Nos.415, 416/2, 401/69, 429, 401/66 of Armoor Village, Nizambad District for the purpose of construction of APSRTC Bus Depot and Bus Station by issuing the Notification under Section 4(1...
Bhupathi Nageswara Rao and Others Vs. Addepally Hanumantha Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD624; 2000(6)ALT542
ORDER1. The defendants in the suit aggrieved by the docket order of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole, dated 21-4-2000, in dismissing an unnumbered IA filed by the petitioner, for reopening the suit and dispose of the same on merits, the present revision petition is filed. 2. The respondent herein filed OS No.21 of 1994 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole for a permanent injunction restraining the petitioners herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit scheduled land and the Court below though initially granted temporary injunction in IA No.229 of 1994, vacated the same after the petitioners entered appearance. Though the respondents carried the matter to the High Court, he could not get any favourable order. Subsequently, the suit came up for trial in the year 2000 and after completion of the evidence, the Counsel for the petitioners seemed to have reported that he has no instructions and on that the Court below seemed to h...
Ch. Ramakoteswar Rao Vs. General Manager, Apsrtc, Hyderabad and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD208; 2000(4)ALT27
ORDER1. The petitioner is an employee of A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (the RTC, for brevity). While working as driver in Kodada Bus Depot, disciplinary enquiry was conducted against him for misconduct under Clauses (xviii), (xxi) and (xxvii) of Regulation 28 of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963 (fhe Regulations for brevity). The Depot Manager, Vijayawada by order dated 5-12-1986 imposed the punishment of reduction of pay by four incremental stages for a period of four years and further ordered to treat the period of suspension as 'not on duty'. The appeal by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent was also dismissed by an order dated 8-6-1990. These orders are challenged in this writ petition.2. The petitioner was placed under suspension by an order dated 16-9-1985 for misconduct. By the same order, the following charges were framed against him.(1) For having used vulgar and unparliamentary language againstthe Depot Manager. Jaggaiahpet on 10-9-1985 at about 20.00 hour...
S. Sathish Traders and Others Vs. Anisetti Anjaneyulu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD310; 2000(4)ALT15
ORDER1. Aggrieved by the directions given by the Additional Munsif Magistrate, Parchur, while decreeing a small cause suit No.9 of 1992, directing the petitioner to obtain a succession certificate for execution of the decree, this Revision Petition was filed by the petitioners.2. This Court by order dated 16-2-2000 ordered notice before admission in the CRP and the Counsel for the petitioner was permitted to take out notice by Registered Post with Acknowledgment due. The Counsel for the petitioner filed proof of service of the notice vide USR No. 1527 of 2000 dated 12-4-2000 in the Court. Thereafter the matter underwent two adjournments to find out whether any Counsel entered appearance for respondents in the matter or not. By endorsement dated 12-6-2000, the Registry reported that no Counsel entered appearance for therespondents. Hence, the respondents are set ex parte.3. Coming to the merits of the case, it is not in dispute that one Mr. Kolla Venkatarayudu, son of second petitioner,...
Syed Faizullah Quadri Vs. Director of Higher Education, Hyd. and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD249; 2000(3)ALT609
ORDER1. This case provides a typical illustration of bureaucratic insensitivity and rigidity which resulted in the cancellation of the pension which was duly sanctioned to a poor attender who has retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation after putting in 31 years of service.2. The petitioner was appointed as a full time contingent employee on 1-8-1953 in Osmania College, Kurnool, which is a private aided college. In the year 1962 he was promoted as attender in a regular vacancy. After serving for a total period of31 years, he retired from service on 31-7-1984. His pension papers were duly submitted to the Accountant-General, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, third respondent herein on 9-7-1985 through the proper channel. By proceedings dated 3-9-1985 orders were issued by the third respondent sanctioning the pension of the petitioner with effect from 1-8-1984. Thereafter abruptly on 28-2-1986 by the impugned order the pension was cancelled even without the form...
Maddu Lakshmana Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD663; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)147
ORDER1. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC seeks quashing of the proceedings in FIR l/ACB-VJA/96 registered at police station, ACB, Vijayawada Range in which the petitioner is accused of offence under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The impugned first information report as registered would disclose that the District Inspector, Krishna, ACB, Vijayawada range by name Sri N. Prasad on the basis of which the first information report has been registered, has received the information that the accused being a public servant lias amassed assets disproportionate to the known sources of income. The first information report mentions the lists of certain assets possessed by the accused and also mentions the estimated income of the petitioner.3. The only ground on which the proceedings in the investigation are sought to be quashed is that the said N. Prasad, who is the complainant in the case and on the basis of whose complaint the first i...
Sowjanya and anr. Vs. Chinna Chikkanna
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALT769
ORDERVaman Rao, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as the Government Pleader for Revenue.2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket order dated 30-124999 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur passed in O.S.No. 129 of 1994 directing the petitioners-plaintiffs to deposit Non-Judicial Stamp duty of Rs. 1,153/- after giving credit to stamp duty of Rs. 180/-already deposited.3. The two petitioners-plaintiffs filed suit against their father for partition of joint family properties. The parties entered into a compromise under which the family properties were partitioned into two shares. One share was allotted jointly to the plaintiffs, which has been described in the compromise petition as 'A' schedule, and the other share described in the 'B' schedule was allotted to the defendant-father.4. For preparing the decree on Non-Judicial stamp papers, the Court directed the petitioners-plaintiffs to deposit the stamp duty which has been calcu...
A.P. Residential School (Girls) Parents Association Vs. A.P. Residenti ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALT155
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is an association of the parents of the girls studying in Residential School established and managed by the 2nd respondent-Society. The petitioner assails the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc. No. A4/145/99-2000 dated 17-2-2000 and prays for a mandamus declaring the proposal to shift the first respondent-School from Peddapuram to Tuni as illegal, arbitrary and void and for a further consequential relief to direct the respondents to continue the school at Peddapuram only.2. The 2nd respondent established Residential Schools for boys and girls separately at various places. One such school was established at Kakinada. The school was later shifted during 1990-91 to Peddapuram. The school is now housed in rented premises. According to the petitioner-Association, the school premises at Peddapuram has adequate infrastructural facilities. The residents spent about Rs. 5 lakhs for construction of bathrooms, kitchen, washing platforms etc., and ...
State of A.P. and Another Vs. Sayanna and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-09-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD215; 2000(4)ALT38
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J1. Noticing certain seemingly conflicting observations in the Division Bench decisions of this Court as regards the yardstick to be applied and approach to be adopted while dealing with the petition filed by the Stale for condonation of delay in preferring an appeal, a learned single Judge of this Court--B.S. Raikole, J., has referred this CMP to a Division Bench. The CMP has been filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the District Collector, Mahabubnagar for condonation of delay of 3654 days in filing the second appeal against the judgment of the first appellate Court rendered on 5-2-1985. This case furnishes a typical example of not merely inaction of bureaucratic machinery, but also apathy and casualness towards Court litigation in which fairly valuable land is involved. The explanation for this inordinately long delay is sought to be given in an equally casual manner with vague averments, leaving many unexplained gaps. The long delay by itse...
Mahesh Enterprises, Hyderabad Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-09-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD329; 2000(4)ALT159
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. Inthis tax revision case arising out of the assessment made under APGST Act for the year 1985-86, the question that falls for consideration is about the rate of tax applicable to G.I (galvanised iron) pipes and C.I (cast iron) pipes. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal gave the description of the goods sold as 'G.I pipes and C.I. pipes fittings'. The description given by the appellate Dy. Commissioner is 'C.I. pipes and fittings'. In the assessment order, G.I pipes are not shown at all as one of the items on which the dispute as to rate of tax arises. The assessing authority described the goods as 'G.I fittings.' Thus, the suffix 'pipes' is not found after 'G.I.* in the assessment order. Either 'G.I. pipes' or 'G.I. fittings' are not referred to in the first appeal order at all.2. The Tribunal negatived the contention of the appellant that 'G.I. pipes' are declared goods falling under Entry 2(xi) of the Third Schedule to APGST Act corresponding to item (ii)...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »