Andhra Pradesh Court April 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Challuri Rajaiah and ors. Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisit ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALT14
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to prepare and send the list of land oustees in accordance with G.O. Rt. No. 424 to the 3rd respondent-Singareni Colleries Company for taking further action as required in the said G.O.2. It is the case of the petitioners that the land was acquired by the Government for purpose of Singareni Collieries and as per the Notification issued by the Government in G.O. Rt. No. 424, all the land oustees are entitled for appointment in the Singareni Colleries Company. Since no action is being taken, the present Writ Petition has been filed.3. Now the learned Government Pleader submits that all the petitioners cannot be treated as land oustees by virtue of G.O. Ms. No. 310, dated 11-11-1991 and therefore their names were not forwarded to the Singareni Collieries Company for further action. The learned Counsel for the petitioners relied on a decision of a Division Bench reported in Singareni Collieries C...
Mohd. Ayub Vs. Government of India and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD46; 2000(2)ALT650
ORDER1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition challenges the proceeding in Rc.No.C5.723/M/99, dated 1-4-2000 on the file of the third respondent-DistrictCollector, Krishna, Machilipatnam. The District Collector through the impugned proceedings directed the petitioner to leave India immediately under intimation to the Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Machilipatnam. The said endorsement of the District Collector itself is based upon the Government of A.P. Memo dated 18-2-2000 informing the District Collector that the request of the petitioner, a Pakistan national to slay further in India has been rejected by the Government of Andhra Pradesh.2. Before adverting to the question as to whether the petitioner is entitled for any relief at all from this Court, it may be necessary to notice few relevant facts as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.3. The petitioner claims that he was born on 1-7-1933 at Sheri Daggumilli village, Gudivada Taluk, Krishna District...
Pennar Delta Auyacutdars Association and Others Vs. Government of Andh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD182; 2000(2)ALT634
ORDER1. 'Everybody, irrespective of whether he/she is rich or poor, has equal right over the water given by nature and stored by the efforts of common labour in which he/she has actively participated. Nobody should have special benefits in any way, is my firm belief and conviction.'Pledge of Baliraja Smriti Damwater user's cooperative. The petitioners invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and pray for issuance of an appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing 11.5 TMC of water from Somasila Project for the second crop to the Pennar Delta Ayacutdars as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, apart from being violative of fundamental constitutional guarantees contained in Articles 14,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. The petitioners also pray this Court to issue directions to release water for the second crop.2. The first petitioner claims to be the association representing the interest of agriculturis...
Gurramkonda Sreeramulu and anr. Vs. Gurramkonda Ramakrishnaiah and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALT319
S.R. Nayak, J.1. This is the plaintiffs Second Appeal. The plaintiffs filed suit Q.S. No. 121 of 1985 in the Court of the District Munsif, Piler, against the defendants 1 to 3 for a decree of permanent injunction in respect of the plaint schedule properties. The trial Court dismissed the suit after due trial. The appeal filed by the plaintiffs was also dismissed by the learned appellate Judge. Hence this Second Appeal Under Section 100 C.P.C.2. The learned appellate Judge on consideration of the oral and documentary evidence, recorded the finding that the plaintiffs have failed to establish that they are enjoying the suit schedule properties with specific boundaries in which the defendants are alleged to have interfered with their possession, thereby affirming the finding recorded by the learned trial Judge in his judgment. The learned appellate Judge in Para 15 of the Judgment under appeal has given cogent and acceptable reasons in support of the finding recorded by him. Para (15) rea...
Mohd. Ghouse and ors. Vs. Regional Executive Director, National Airpor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)ALT218
ORDERB.S.A. Swamy, J.1. The petitioners who are working as Lift Operators in the first respondent-unit at Hyderabad under the administrative control of the second respondent, filed this writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare that the petitioners are eligible to the pay scale of Rs. 2,950-90-3,850-100-4,850 attached to the post of Lift Operator Higher Grade with effect from 1-7-1990, the day on which they were transferred from the Central P.W.D. of the second respondent and pay all the increments and difference in pay and allowances apart from extending the Revised Pay Scales from 1-1-1986.2. The questions that arise for consideration in this writ petition are:(1) Whether all the petitioners are entitled to the Pay Scales attached to the High Speed Lift Operators from the date of their transfer to the respondent-authority from the Central P.W.D.?(2) Whether the first petitioner is entitled to claim the salary of the Lift Operator till he was appointed in that capacity on 8-...
C. Krishna Babu Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD238; 2000(3)ALT39
ORDER1. These writ petitions are filed by the three Chartered Accountants against the disciplinary actions taken by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India under Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (for short 'the Act') read with the provisions of the Chartered Accounts Regulations (for short 'the Regulations') on the basis of the complaint lodged by the 4th respondent herein, namely, one Sri M.S. Varadachari who is also a Chartered Accountant. The writ petitioners and the 4th respondent arethe partners of the firm called 'M/s. Varadachari and Company'. This Court while entertaining the WP No.31855 of 1998, by way of interim order directed that the disciplinary actions taken against the petitioner may go on as per the progamme already notified but the Institute shall not take any final decision in the matter until further directions. Similar interim directions are issued in all the three writ petitions and these interim directions have been in opera...
Srimad Paramahamsa Parivrajakacharya Jagadguru Shankaracharya Revenka ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD584; 2000(3)ALT701
1. Rule Nisi.2. The petitioner is Peethadhipathi of Revankapeetham, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad. He questions the action of respondents in deciding to celebrate the Srirama Navami festival and Sri Sitarama Kalyanotsavam at Bhadrachalam temple on 13th April, 20(70. According to him the decision to celebrate the festival is taken by the respondents against the opinion of the religious heads and Peethadipathis. It is further argued that the respondents have no power under any law to interfere in the religious affairs of any community. It is further stated that, as per the panchangas and other shastras, Srirama Navami would fall this year on 12th April, 2000. The State Governments and Central Government had declared 12th April, 2000 as public holiday for celebrating Srirama Navami festival. Even the State Government of Andhra Pradesh had declared 12th April, 2000 as holiday but now it has been changed to 13th April, 2000.3. When this petition came up for hearing on 4th April, 2000 this Cou...
Mohd. Jeelani Vs. Syed. JamrouddIn and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD752; 2000(3)ALT766
1. The short question involved in this second appeal relates to the jurisdiction of the civil Court to interfere with the decision of the Atiyat Court appointed under the A.P. (Telengana Area) Atiyat Enquiries Act, 1952. For proper appreciation of the question involved, it is necessary to state a few facts.2. There is a Darga known as 'Ahmad Khan Shaheed Shareef' situated at Bodhan, For rendering the services in the said Darga, an extent of Acs.1.14 guntas of land was originally granted in favour of three individuals jointly, namely, Anwar Shah, Ameena Bee and Ahmed Ali Shah, byMuntakhab Bearing No.18914 dated 5th Rajab 1300 Hijri (Ex.A1). As could be seen from the material on record, after the death of the original grantees succession was sanctioned in the name of Md. Ghansi alias Md Khaja son of Mohinuddin Shah in File No.7/58 of 1349 Fasli corresponding to 1939 AD. It may be mentioned that the said Md. Ghansi was the father of the first defendant, appellant herein. Subsequently succ...
Lalitha Sankar Narayan and Others Vs. Rohini
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD759; 2000(3)ALT672
ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. Heard both the Counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the respondent at the admission stage. This Letters Patent Appeal is filed with leave of the Court against the judgment and decree in CMA No.1511 of 1992. The application filed by the respondent herein under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for granting probate of Will executed by late R.S. Shankar Narayan on 26-9-1989 was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in OP No.1236 of 1990 dated 15-3-1991. Against the said order, the respondent herein filed CMA No.1511 of 1992 which was allowed by the learned single Judge on 31-12-1999 against which the appellants herein filed this Letters Patent Appeal with the leave of the Court. 1st appellant is the wife, appellants 2 and 3 are the sons and the 4th appellant is the father of late Shankar Narayan.2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein filed OP No.1236of 1990 for grant of probate of Will under Se...
Jagadish Travels Vs. Director, National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyd. an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-06-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD641; 2000(2)ALT796
ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C. V. Rajeev Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. At their request the matter is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage. Rule Nisi.2. The petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the contract of the petitioner for a period of one more year pursuant to the satisfactory certificate dated 4-11-1999 issued by the second respondent herein as illegal and contrary to law.3. The petitioner entered into a contract with the first respondent for supplyof six TATA Sumo Vehicles on hire basis. The contract period was for a period of two years commencing from 1-4-1998. Admittedly the contract has come to an end. The petitioner herein relies upon clause (D) of the contract and contends that since his performance is satisfactory, as certified by one of the authorities of the first respondent, he is entitled for e...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »