Andhra Pradesh Court October 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Rama Krishna Vs. Municipal Council, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam Distr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD46; 2000(6)ALT613
ORDER1. This writ petition was filed challenging the Resolution No.246 dated 29-1-1998 passed by the 1st respondent proposing to give an extent of Acs.1-50 cents comprised in TS No.101 of Anakapalle to the 3rd respondent for parking the lorries. During the pendency of the writ petition the impugned Resolulion No.246 was cancelled by the 1st respondent and by a Resolution No.42(D) dated 26-5-1999, the Municipal Council decided the hand over the same land to AP Vaidya Vidhana Parishad for the purpose of construction of 100 bed hospital. Therefore, the petitioner filed necessary application seeking amendment of the writ petition and prayer in the writ petition. It was allowed. As of now the writ petition challenges the resolution No.42(D) dated 26-5-1999 as one without jurisdiction, illegal and violative of the Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India insofar as the land admeasuring Acs.0-15 cents in TS No.101 is concerned.2. Briefly stated facts are as follows:The petitioner cla...
T.V. Narayana, President, Arya Prathinidhi Sabha Vs. G. Devendranath a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD496; 2000(6)ALT506
ORDER1. The petitioner herein is the President for a body called 'Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Andhra Pradesh' which is a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, i350-Fasli (hereinafter referred to as 'The Act') Respondents 1 to 3 are the members of the petitioner-Sabha. Under the Rules and Regulations of the said Arya Pratinidhi Sabha - that Sabha and its members are required to pay faithfully obedience to the commands of a body called'International Aryan League'. The said League is declared under Rule 8 of the said Rules, is the Apex body of all the Arya Samajas situated in different continents of the world having its main office at Delhi. Under Regulation 12 of the Regulations of the Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, the Sabha is required to abide by all the directions and instructions given by the International Arya League - the fifth respondent herein.2. It appears that the elections to the Governing Body of the 'Arya Pratinidhi Sabha' of And...
A. Thiripal Vs. Project Officer, I.T.D.A. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)ALT669
ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. This writ petition is filed for declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner to the post of Warden Gr.II at Paderu of I.T.D.A. as unconstitutional and illegal and consequently for a direction to the respondents to appoint him to the said post forthwith as he is in the panel of selected candidates.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:--The post of Warden Gr.II had been notified by the Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency Paderu, Visakhapatnam in 1999 as part of Special Drive to fill up S.C. and S.T. backlog vacancies. The Government in order to fill up the backlog vacancies reserved for S.C. and S.T. candidates, have issued a G.O.Ms.No. 238, General Administration (Services-A) Department, dated 26-05-1999. By virtue of the said G.O., the Government have relaxed the written examinations and interviews (oral tests) for limited recruitment to be conducted by various recruiting agencies, exercising the powers conf...
Jakkamsetty David Francies Souraiah and Another Vs. Executive Officer, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD169; 2001(1)ALT387
ORDER1. In this Batch of writpetitions, while conceding title to the respondent temple, the petitioners only sought the relief that they should not be evicted from the suit schedule premises without following due process of law.2. Having sympathised with the position in which the petitioners are placed as most of them are middle-class and low paid employees, who purchased the lands in question from the persons (land-grabbers), who claimed title over the property, by investing their hard earned monies, this Court summoned the higher Officials and after persuasion for over 11/2 years, the Government issued G.P. Ms. No. 578, Revenue (Endowments-IV) Department, dated 19th August, 2000, agreeing to alienate the land as per the terms and conditions mentioned in that order. This exercise was done by the Court so that atleast by paying value of the land, they can save the structures raised by them. Otherwise, all the buildings have to be brought down after the litigation comes to an end, if no...
B. Siva Prasad Reddy Vs. Convenor, Eamcet-2000, Jnt University, Hydera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD669; 2000(6)ALT545
ORDER1. The writ petition is filed praying for a writ a mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent namely, the Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,Hyderabad (hereafter called 'ANGRAU') prescribing the condition that a candidate who has completed 22 years of upper age by 31-12-2000 is not eligible for seeking admission in I year B.V.Sc. and A.M. (Bachelor of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry) as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The petitioner had chequered education career with which this case has no concern. Finally he appeared for Engineering Agricultural and Medical Common Entrance Test, 2000 (EAMCET) and obtained a rank of 915. After declaration of the results of EAMCET, so as to prosecute B.V.Sc and A.H. for the academic year 2000-2001, he applied for the said course. By a paper notification dated 30-8-2000, the candidates were required for spot counselling for admission. In the said paper notification it was mentioned in the note that the persons with ranks 915, 127...
Prof. Pannalal, Registrar, Osmania University, Hyd. Vs. Holy Bharathi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD674; 2000(6)ALT430
ORDERBilal Nazki, J1. This appeal has been filed by the Registrar of the Osmania University who was respondent No.3 in the writ petition. Respondent No. 1 who was writ petitioner has filed counter, otherrespondents were not summoned as it was not felt necessary to hear them for the disposal of this appeal.2. The order challenged in this appeal is the order in Contempt Case No.1232 of 2000 of which only the respondent No.3 in the writ petition is aggrieved. There are no directions against respondents 2 to 4 in the order passed in the contempt petition. Therefore, this Court thought it fit not to give any notice to respondents 2 to 4. This appeal is also in a very short compass and the appellant's contention is that the order passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in a contempt petition could not have been passed in the facts and circumstances of the case. It is also contended that the order enlarges the scope of the order which was passed in the writ petition. Therefore, the o...
Unitech Industrial Corporation and Another Vs. Arvind Engineering Co., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD697; 2001(1)ALT62
1. This appeal was filed against the judgment and decree dated 26-10-1987 in O.S. No.1486 of 1984 on the file of the I Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the learned Judge decreed the suit with costs filed for recovery of money.2. The said judgment is assailed in this appeal on the ground that the lowerCourt has not correctly appreciated the pleadings in the case, the issues framed and the evidence adduced in relation thereto, that the trial Court has erred in holding that Ex.A1 was issued to the defendant and the goods were in fact supplied to him, the trial Court erred in rejecting the plea of the defendant in this regard and the evidence adduced, that the lower Court erred in holding that Ex.A2 bills were delivered to defendant and the cheques were paid towards the said bill and that an amount of Rs.25,058.15 ps., is still due, the lower Court failed to see that there is no signature on Ex.A2, that there is no proof of defendant having received it, that there is no de...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Secunderabad Vs. A. Balraj and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-2000
Reported in: 2002ACJ1724; 2001(1)ALD125
ORDER1. This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company questioning the award on the ground that the owner of the vehiclehas paid the premium on 3-7-1989, subsequent to the accident. The accident took place on 2-7-1989 at about 7 p.m. 2. The brief facts of the case: On 2-7-1989 at about 7 p.m., Balaraj 1st respondent herein along with his family members boarded one RTC bus at Anantasagar to go to Malkapur. When the bus reached Malkapur bus stage on N.H.No.9, they got down and while they were collecting their luggage by the side of the road, one Car MYQ 9925 driven by its driver rashly and negligently came in a wrong direction and hit the first respondent herein, due to which he sustained multiple injuries all over his body. He was shifted to Sangareddy Headquarters Hospital and from there he was referred to Gandhi Hospital at Secunderabad. Due to the accident the spleen of the 1st respondent was removed. The injured Balaraj was aged 9 years and studying 4th class at the time of the accid...
Anumanthu Venkata Ramana and anr. Vs. Venkadaru Subbarajeswari and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALT125
ORDERBilal Nazki, J.1. An order passed in an Insolvency petition being I.P. No. 3 of 1989 was challenged by way of appeal before the II Additional District Judge, Eluru who dismissed the appeal. The appellate Court's order is challenged in this revision. Various grounds have been taken to challenge the order under revision, but in view of what this Court is about to hold, all the grounds agitated before this Court are not being considered. It is seen that while the appeal was pending an application came to be filed by the petitioner on 30th August, 1999 in which the petitioner sought permission to lead additional evidence. He wanted to bring on record and mark certain copies of the sale deeds which according to him had bearing over the matter. This application was entertained by the Court below on 31st August, 1999, notice was given to other side as is evident from the copies of docket orders produced, counter was not filed, there were several opportunities given to the respondents in ...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Balraj and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-2000
Reported in: I(2003)ACC558
N.V. Ramana, J.1. This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company questioning the award on the ground that the owner of the vehicle has paid the premium on 3.7.1989, subsequent to the accident. The accident took place on 2.7.1989 at about 7 p.m.2. The brief facts of the case are: On 2.7.1989 at about 7 p.m. Balraj, respondent No. 1 herein, along with his family members boarded one R.T.C. bus at Anantsagar to go to Malkapur. When the bus reached Malkapur Bus Stand on N.H. No. 9, they got down and while they were collecting their luggage by the side of the road, one car MYQ 9925 driven by its driver rashly and negligently came in a wrong direction and hit the respondent No. 1 herein, due to which he sustained multiple injuries all over his body. He was shifted to Sangareddy Headquarters Hospital and from there he was referred to Gandhi Hospital at Secundarabad. Due to the accident the spleen of respondent No. 1 was removed. Injured Balraj was aged 9 years and studying in 4th Class at the t...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »