Andhra Pradesh Court September 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gmr Vasavi Industries Limited and Another Vs. Government of Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD123
1. Rule nisi.2. The first petitioner is a public limited company and the second petitioner is the Managing Director of the company. The company was incorporated in the year 1986 for the purpose of manufacturing Ferro Alloy and it was registered as Sree Sarada Ferro Alloys Limited, but by an amendment to the Memorandum of Association dated 21-12-1992 the main objects of the company were changed. and the Company became entitled to carry on the business of Brewery. The second petitioner besides being Managing Director is the Share holder of the company holding 47,500 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The petitioners obtained permissions from the respondents and also the Central Government and established a Brewery at Bantupally village of Ranasthalam mandal in Srikakulam district. The petitioners also entered into an agreement with another Company viz., M/s. Shaw Wallace and Company Limitedwhich is a manufacturer of well known brands of beer. Specific brands of M/s. Shaw Wallace and Company ...
Manchineni Venkata Ratnam Vs. District Judge, Krishna-cum-appellate Te ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD169; 1999(6)ALT707
ORDERR. Ramanujam, J. 1. Whether a tenant, who is running a poultry farm on a land that was taken on lease can claim the tenancy rights guaranteed under Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956?2. This is the question that arises for consideration in this writ petition.3. The facts that gave rise to this writ petition are:Sri Durga Malleswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam, represented by its Executive Officer, 3rd respondent herein, hereinafter referred to as 'the Devasthanam', is the owner of Ac.6.66 cents of land in RS No.437 of Poramki village, Krishna District. The said property was given on lease, originally, to the father of the petitioner herein. Item No.l of the petition schedule property, i.e.,Ac. 1.00 cents out of Ac.6.66 cents, was leased out for the period 1987-88 on a rent of Rs.3,500/- for running a poultry farm. The remaining Ac.5.66 cents, i.e., Item No.2 of the petition schedule property, was leased out for the said period at an annual rent of Rs. 1,10...
D. Chandra Reddy Vs. Gowrisetty Prabhakar Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD281; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)722; [2000]99CompCas102(AP)
ORDER1. These two petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC have been filed for quashing the proceedings in CC No.99 of 1999 and CC No.104 of 1999 on the file of Special Mobile Court, Kareemnagar.2. The petitioner, who is the accused in both the cases, has been prosecuted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short Act) on the ground that it is the Managing Director of the Company who issued the cheque and petitioner did not issue any cheque in his personal capacity and as such the offence under Section 138 of the Act cannot be fastened to the petitioner.3. The gist of the allegations in the complaint may be noted. The complainant has been running finance business under the name Om Sal Securities and Investments Private Limited. The accused approached the complainant for finance and requested the plaintiff to pay Rs.6,40,000/-. The complainant paid to the accused a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- through a demand draft and Rs.40,000/- in cash on 22-11-1996. The accused executed...
Mudda Rama Jaya Narasimha Phani Kumar and Another Vs. Mudda Kameswara ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD564
1. The plaintiffs are the appellants in both these appeals. AS No.2664 of 1984 has been filed by the appellants against the decree and judgment in OS No.32 of 1974 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada. AS No.2577 of 1984 has been filed by the plaintiffs/appellants against the decree and judgment in OS No.87 of 1974 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada. Since both the appeals raise a common question whether the suit schedule properties are joint family properties and if so, whether the plaintiffs are entitled for their shares, these two appeals are disposed off by a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties to these appeals would be referred in accordance with their ranking in the suits.AS No.2664 of 1984 :2. The plaintiffs are the appellants. Suit OS No.32 of 1974 has beep filed on the file of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada for partition and separate possession of plaintiffs 2/9th joint sharein plaint 'A' ...
Midhani Workers and Staff Union Vs. Mishradhatu Nigam Ltd., Hyd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD332; (2000)ILLJ698AP
ORDERR. Ramanujam, J 1. The issueinvolved as well as the respondent in both these writ petitions are common. Hence, both the writ petitions are disposed of by this common order.2. The respondent in both the writ petitions M/s. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd., is a Government of India undertaking and is hereinafter referred to as 'the Industry'. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.7208 of 1996 is Midhani Workers and Staff Union and the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 13890 of 1996 is Midhani Mazdoor Sangh. The petitioners are hereinafter referred to as 'the workmen'.3. Writ Petition No.7208 of 1996 is filed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Industry to pay the statutory minimum bonus to all its workmen and employees for the accounting years 1985-86 and 1986-87. Writ Petition No.13890 of 1996 is filed claiming similar relief for the accounting year 1986-87 with interest at 18% p.a.4. The facts, giving rise to these writ petitions, in brief, are as follows :The workmen of th...
M. Malla Reddy Vs. T. Venkatrama Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)32; 1999(6)ALT200; 2000CriLJ1086
B.S. Raikote, J.1. This writ appeal is preferred by the original complainant - Sri M. Malla Reddy, former Vice-Chancellor, Osmania University, Hyderabad being aggrieved by the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated 4-2-1999 passed in W.P.No. 28387/1998. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge allowed the W.P.No. 28387/1998 and quashed the proceedings so far as it related to accused No. 1, T. Venkatrama Reddy, in C.C. No. 730/1996 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.2. The learned senior Counsel Sri Malla Reddy appearing for the appellant - complainant contended that the learned single Judge has erred in quashing the complaint against the accused No. 1. He submitted that the complaint and the sworn statement recorded Under Section 200 Cr.P.C. disclose a triable offence Under Section 501 I.P.C. even as against accused No. 1. He elaborated his argument by taking us through the entire complaint and the sworn statement of the complainant and contende...
Vanka Siva Kumar @ Siva Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(5)ALD757; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)614; 1999(5)ALT299; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)246; 2000CriLJ687
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J. 1. Accused No.1 in Sessions Case No. 110 of 1994, which was decided by the First Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, is the appellant herein. The accused-appellant herein and six others were tried for the following charges. The first charge against A1 to A7 was under Section 148 IPC for committing the offence of rioting and causing the death of one Pallanti Siva Ramakrishna Prasad. The learned Judge acquitted all the accused of the said charge. The second charge against A1 to A7 was under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. The appellant was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC simplicitor and was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs.5000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. The third charge against A1 to A7 was under Section 324 read with Section 149 IPC for causing hurt to PWs.1 and 2. A2 A4 and A7 were convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment...
Dr. V. Sudheer Reddy Vs. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, H ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD349; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)618
ORDER1. The petitioner an associated professor in the department of Entomology in the respondent University filed this writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus to set aside the proceedings of the respondent University in Memo No.34702/AHRDP/Trg./A2/98, dated 12-7-1999 as it is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent University to consider his case for short term training programme abroad in the specialised areas of Biochemical basis of host plant resistance in insects or Biocontrol agents in plant protection under Agricultural and Human Resources Development Programme (for short 'AHRDP') for the academic year 1999-2000, duly declaring that lie is within the age limit prescribed for deputation as on 31-1-1999; the last date for receipt of applications from the eligible candidates pursuant to the 1st notification issued by the respondent University in Memo No.14028/AHRDP/Trg./A2/98, dated 28-12-1998/4-1-1999.2. The respondents University in their counter cont...
Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Gunutur Vs. Ko ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1999
Reported in: II(2000)ACC315; 1999(6)ALD705; 1999(6)ALT524
1. This appeal is filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Kothapet, Guntur, aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Guntur, dated 29-3-1996 in WC No.93 of 1994, wherein the Commissioner has awarded an amount of Rs.92,841/- in WC No.93 of 1994 dated 6-4-1995 granting one week time from the date of receipt of the above said order todeposit the above said compensation awarded by the Commissioner, failing which orders will be given for payment of interest at 12% p.a. along with 50 per cent penalty under Section 4-A(3) of Workmen's Compensation Act. But the opposite parties have not deposit the awarded amount of Rs.92,481/-. Though notices were served on 1-2-1996 on opposite parties, they have not turned up. Therefore, the Commissioner has awarded Rs.24,128/- as interest from 12-12-1993 to 12-2-1996 (26 months) and Rs.46,400/- as 50% penalty on the awarded compensation amount. Therefore, the total amount of Rs.1,63,369/- was directed to be depo...
Bijili Odamma and ors. Vs. A. Dharmapuri and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1999
Reported in: II(2000)ACC327; 1999(6)ALT195
Elipe Dharma Rao, J.1. This appeal is filed by the claimants aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9-3-1993 in O.P.No. 307/1989 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge), Karimnagar, awarding an amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- by way of compensation for the untimely death of the deceased Bijili Odelu, working as a Coal Filler in Singareni Collieries Company Limited, in a motor accident that occurred on 3-5-1989. At the time of the accident the deceased was travelling on a scooter bearing No. DIH 7230. When he reached Raghavarao Society Chowrastha in Godavarikhani at 12.15 p.m. the first respondent drove the motor cycle bearing No. APH 2844 in a rash and negligent manner with high speed and dashed the scooter of the deceased causing him injuries. Bijili Odelu was admitted in the Area Hospital of Singareni Collieries Company at Godavarikhani where he succumbed to the injuries. A case in Cr.No. 90/89 was registered by the Police, Godavarikhani I Town. The deceased ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »