Andhra Pradesh Court September 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.A. Abood Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Warangal, and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD11; 1999(5)ALT604
ORDER1. The Award passed by the Labour Court, Warangal in ID No.173 of 1987, dated 22-4-1988 refusing to grant any relief to the petitioner herein is challenged in this writ petition on various grounds.2. The petitioner while working as a Driver in the second respondent-Corporation was served with a charge-sheet containingthe following charges:1. For having caused the dislocation of punctual operation of service i.e., 8.00 hours Hyderabad on 25-11-1982 for no written reasons and demanding change of vehicle No.AAZ 3003 booked for the said service causing inconvenience to the travelling public due to your gross negligence. This constitutes your misconduct under Regulation 28(ix)(a) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1963. 2. For your insubordination, misbehavior with AMF while on duly on 25-11-1982 in the Depot premises for no written reasons when you have been booked to work as driver for 8.00 hours Hyderabad service with vehicle No.AAE-3003. This constitutes misconduct 28(viii)...
Margadarsi Chit Funt Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Government of Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(5)ALD718; 1999(5)ALT548
ORDER1. These writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order, as the question that arise for consideration in all these writ petitions is one and the same.2. The petitioners are the companies/ firms. They are doing chit fund business in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The details of each one of the petitioner and particulars of their business activity and the number of branches they have in the State of Andhra Pradesh need not be noticed as such details may have no bearing whatsoever on the question that falls for consideration.3. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are aggrieved by the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent-Government of Andhra Pradesh dated 4-6-1992 contained in the Memo No.78348/Regn.II-2/91-92 which is purported to be in the nature of clarification issued at the instance of the 2nd respondent-Director of Chits and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps. Since the whole controversy revolves around the said Memo, it may be appropriate to notice ...
G.E. Peter Paul and Others Vs. T. Chandramouli and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD207
1. Having been aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 26-4-1995 passed by the learned Vth Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in OS No.1185 of 1987 the defendants 1, 3 and 5 to 7 preferred this appeal, while arraying the other defendants 2, 4, 8 and 9 as respondents 2 to 5 and giving up defendants 10 to 12.2. The first respondent herein filed a suit for declaration of his title to the plaint 'A' schedule mentioned property, for consequential possession of 'B' schedule property and for recovery of damages.3. Briefly stated the facts are thus:The plaint 'B' schedule mentionedproperty shown in red colour in the plan attached to the plaint is part and parcel of the plaint 'A' schedule mentioned property (for short 'the suit house'). Smt. Suguma Devi Paul, the 10th defendant in the suit is the 2nd wife of late Venkatachalam Paul. The 1st defendant in the suit and late Manohar Narayana Reddy were the sons of late Venkatachalam Paul through his first wife. Second defendant is t...
Bathula Pulla Reddy and Others Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD137; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)789; 1999(5)ALT422; 2000CriLJ1515
ORDERRamesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. Accused Nos.4, 5 and 6 in SC No.133 of 1995 which was decided by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge at Krishna at Machilipatnam are the appellants herein.2. The Inspector of Police, Nuzvid originally filed a charge-sheet against 14 accused. Even before the committal of the case, A1 and A2 died and hence the case against them stood abated. The other accused Nos.3 to 14 were committed for trial before the Sessions Court. The learned Additional Sessions Judge framed the charges against A3 to A14 under Sections 148 and 302 IPC. Subsequently A3 and A7 died. Therefore the case against them stood abated. The learned Sessions Judge acquitted accused Nos.8 to 14 of all the charges, but convicted A4, A5 and A6 under Sections 148 and 302 IPC and they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 148 IPC. The accused were further convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC and theywere sentenced to suffer imprisonment f...
K. Sitaram Vs. Vice-chancellor, S.V. University, Tirupati and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD596; 1999(6)ALT474
ORDER1. Both these writ petitions have been instituted by a former Senior Assistant of S.V. University, Tirupati. They could conveniently be heard together and having been so heard are disposed of by this common judgment.2. Heard Sri P. V. Sanjay kumar and Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, respectively.3. In WP No.7684 of 1994 the petitioner challenges his continuance under suspension since 20-6-1991, despite the conclusion of the disciplinary enquiry and submission of the enquiry report by the Standing Board of Enquiry for short 'the Board' on 5-7-1993.4. Subsequent to the institution of the above writ petition, by the proceedings Memo No.E1/1/94, dated 5-9-1994 the petitioner was communicated the resolution of the Board of Management imposing the penalty of reduction in rank permanently from the post of Sr. Assistant to Jr. Assistant. Assailing the said proceedings WP No. 16903 Of 1994 is instituted seeking a consequentialrelief of a dire...
Apddc Staff and Workers Union and Others Vs. Government of A.P. and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD357
ORDER1. The petitioners 3 in number, are the trade unions consisting of staff and workers of the A.P. Dairy Development Co-operative Federation-4th respondent herein filed this writ petition questioning the conversion of Vijaya Visakha District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limitedas a Vijaya Visakha Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-operative Union Limited under A.P. Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995 (Act 30 of 1995) on various grounds by impleading the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandary and Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, A.P., Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as RCS, A.P. Dairy Development Co-operative Federation (hereinafter referred to as federation), District Co-operative Officer, Visakhapatnam and Vijaya Visakha District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited which stood converted as Vijaya Visakha Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-operative Union Limited as respondents 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively.2...
Project Manager, Singareni Coolieries Co., Ltd., Adilabad Vs. Presidin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD575; 1999(6)ALT499
ORDER1. These two writ petitions are instituted by the Singareni Collieries Company Limited, against two Awards of the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, declaring the lock out for two distinct periods and consequent denial of wages to workmen of the Coal Chemical Complex (for short 'the Complex') as illegal and directing payment of wages for the periods of lockout declared as illegal by the Industrial Tribunal.2. Common questions arising, these two writ petitions have been heard together and are disposed fo by this common judgment. Heard Sri K. Srinivasa Murthy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned Counsel for workmen.Writ Petition No.3192 of 1994 Lockout was declared in the Complex from 15-2-1988 to 24-2-1988 consequently wages for the workmen were denied. The 2nd respondent-Union pursuant to the order of the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, dated 6-3-1989 got referred the dispute under Section 10(1)(d)(2-A) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whet...
Raman-teels (Tech) and Process Engineering Ltd. and ors. Vs. Howrah In ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)ALD(Cri)846; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)148; 2000CriLJ603
ORDERVaman Rao, J. 1. This petition under Section 482 of Cr. PC has been filed for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No. 12 of 1999 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad wherein the petitioners are the accused and are prosecuted for the of-fence under Section 420 of IPC on the basis of the complaint filed by respondent No. 1 herein.2. The relevant facts may be stated briefly : The complainant has been running the business in iron and steel at Boiguda. The complainant supplied stainless steel material worth Rs. 3,65,000/-. Towards part payment of the same, accused No. 2 who is the Managing Director of accused No. 1-M/s. Raman Tech and Process Engineering Limited issued a cheque for an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/-. After issuing of cheque, accused No. 2 made certain part payments towards remaining balance amount payable to the complainant. On being asked to do so by accused No. 2, the complainant presented the cheque in their Bank, namely, Vardhaman Mahila Co-operative Ba...
V. Rama Krishna Vs. Andhra Bank, Hyd. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD16
1. This appeal is preferred, being aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 15-4-1991 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, in AS No.52 of 1989. By the impugned judgement and decree, the lower appellate Court set aside the judgement and decree dated 29-01-1988 of the learned IV Additional District Munsif, Visakhapatnam passed in OS No.324 of 1985 and consequently the lower appellate Court dismissed the plaintiffs suit.2. Learned Counsel for the appellant strenuously contended that the judgement and decree of the lower appellate Court are unsustainable. He submitted that the lower appellate Court is in error in holding that the suit filed by the plaintiff was not maintainable. The lower appellate Court has not given reasons in dismissing theplaintiff's suit. He further submitted that so far as the appellant-plaintiff is concerned, there is a concurrent finding of both the Courts below that the appellant was senior to defendant Nos.5 to 12 and 14 to 24; an...
T. Kesava Chandra Gupta and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD45; 2000(1)ALT765
ORDER1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions are carrying on the business of rice milling by way of rice milling industry within the limits of various Gram Panchayats. In WP No.9939 of 1997, it is stated, Respondent 3 therein, Narsannapet Gram Panchayat, initially issued a Notification No. 152 of 1995 dated 28-11 -1995 fixing the licence fee for various businesses and trades being carried on within its jurisdiction. The said notification is stated to have come into force with effect from 1-4-1996. As per item 79 of the said notification, the rates of licence fee payable for various individual components pertaining to the rice milling industry have been specified dependant upon the horse power employed for running the processes in the said components. According to the petitioners different rates of licence fee have been prescribed for different components of the rice milling machinery such as Sieves, Elevator,Blower, Paddy cleaner, and jute press. The petitioners in WP No.9939 of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »