Andhra Pradesh Court July 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Satyanarayana Vs. A.P. State Trading Corporation Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD385; 1999(4)ALT557
ORDER1. Sri M. Vijay Kumar took notice for the respondent-Corporation. The writ petition was heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. Substantially similar contentions are raised in both the writ petitions and Sri P. Gangaiah Naidu, learned Counsel .who appeared for the petitioners in both the cases, put forth common contentions. Hence, both the writ petitions were clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.3. The petitioner in WP No.13793 of 1999 is the Accounts Officer whereas the petitioner in WP No.13S24 of 1999 is the Assistant Manager and both of them are employees of A.P. State Trading Corporation Limited, the respondent herein, and currently serving at the Nalgonda Branch of the Corporation.4. The petitioners by the impugned proceedings of the Managing Director of the Corporation dated 30-6-1999 are placed under suspension in contemplation of the departmental enquiry against them.5. Sri P. Gangaiah Naidu, learn...
B. Dayasagar Vs. Dist. Election Authority and Collector, (Pt Wing), R. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD395
1. At the interlocutory stage, both the parties consented final adjudication of the matter.2. The writ petition is filed questioning the Election Notification bearing Roc. No.E1/1359/99, dated 17-5-1999 issued by the first respondent notifying schedule of conduct of election to the post of Sarpanch of Thoomkunta Gram Panchayat of Shamirpet Mandal, R.R. District as illegal and contrary to the Rules viz., A.P. Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1994.3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Note in the said Notification which is as follows :'As per the direction of the Hon'ble High Court in WP No.24549 of 1996, dated 24-4-1998 Sri Sadanand Yadav (Petitioner in the said WP) and Sri Y. Suresh (respondent No.2 in the said WP) stand nominated to the Office of Sarpanch. The Election Officer may also receive fresh nominations from other contestants, if any.'4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that one Sadanand Yadav was the elected Sarpanch of Thoomkunta Gram Panch...
Pippalla Surya Bhagavan Vs. Member Secretary, Apseb, Hyderabad and Oth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD422; 1999(4)ALT257; (1999)IILLJ1004AP
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J 1. The action of Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as 'APSEB') in not absorbing the petitioner to the post of Lower Division Clerk has led to this Full Bench reference. The matter was firstly dealt with by a learned single Judge, who, by his order dated 2-9-1994, referred the matter to the Division Bench in view of the view already taken regarding Memo No.OSD(P)/DM.I/ A3/1138/85-1, dated 26-8-1985 issued by APSEB.2. Under the above Memo, APSEB had evolved a Scheme for absorbing the ex-casual labourers stipulating some conditions in the context of the post to be filled up. For such ex-casual labourers, who can only read and write, the requirement was 100 working days, for IX Class pass 90 working days, X Class pass 80 workingdays and ITI (Electrical Trade) Pass 60 working days. For this category of ex-casual labourers, there was no relaxation of working days. But, insofar as Graduates are concerned, they were made eligible for abs...
Divisional Manager, Apsrtc, Khammam Vs. State Transport Appellate Trib ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD427; 1999(6)ALT197
ORDER1. The State Transportundertaking is the petitioner who assails the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal dated 8-1-1996 passed in AS No.650/93 according a permit to the 3rd respondent in respect of the alleged town service route between Kothagudem PO and Kotha Palvancha. The facts relevant for the determination of the issue, briefly are as under:The 3rd respondent filed an application for pucca permit for the town service route referred to above, before the RTA, Khammam. The facts established from the record of the case are that the route in question is of a total length of 12.5 km., of which 2 km., is within the Municipal limits and 10.5 km., beyond the Municipal limits. The RTA having declined to grant permit, the 3rd respondent approached the R1 Tribunal, which passed the impugned order granting permit. Hencethe State Transport undertaking is before this Court.2. Sri Earanath learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the permit granted by the Tribunal, impugned...
E. Murali Mohan Vs. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hydera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(5)ALD23; 1999(5)ALT402
ORDER1. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the first respondent in giving a direction to the third respondent to admit the petitioner to I year Bachelor of Veterinary Science Course for the academic year 1998-99, the present writ petition is filed.2. Heard both the Counsel.3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner herein appeared for the EAMCET examination held in May, 1998 and secured rank - 2095. Thereafter, the first respondent called the petitioner for interview and in the interview held on 31-12-1998 he was offered a seat in B.Sc., (Agri.) and he was informed by the Convenor that if any vacancy arises in B.V.Sc., course he will be accommodated as per his rank. On that understanding the petitioner seemed to have paid the tuition fee. But he was not attending the college as he was not interested in prosecuting B.Sc. (Agri) course. Subsequently, in the sliding that has taken place, the petitioner secured a seat in B.V.Sc., course and the Convenor informed the second responden...
Dade Sharief Vs. Director-general and Inspector-general of Prisons and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD169; 2000(1)ALT196
ORDER1. The petitioner-a retired Chief Head Warden filed this writ petition questioning the action of the respondents in not paying the arrears due to him pursuant to the 1st respondent's Proceedings No. 1857/BA4/88/SG-HW/D, dated 20-10-1992, wherein the petitioner was given selection grade in the category of Head Warden with effect from 1-1-1972 to 26-9-1973, the day on which he was promoted as Chief Head Warden.2. Heard both the Counsel.3. The respondents in their counter having admitted the liability for payment of the amount, brought to the notice of the Court that because of the objection taken by the District Treasury Officer, Warangal and in the light of the G.O. Ms. No.191, Finance, and Planning (FW.PC.III)Department, dated 11-11-1992, wherein the Government has taken a decision that no proposals for appointment to the post of selection grade can be entertained by the Government from that day onwards as employees were given sufficient time putforth their cases and also the fact...
Adapala Venkata Ranga Rao Vs. Ravelle Satyavathi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(5)ALD111; 1999(4)ALT347
ORDER1. This civil revision petition is at the instance of the respondent in the eviction petition under the A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act against the orders of the Principal District Judge and the Tenancy Appellate Tribunal, Guntur in A.T.A. No.52 of 1994, dated 25-9-1998.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petition schedule land is jointly owned by the 1st respondent in the revision petition and her husband. Further, it was also the case of the 1st respondent that her husband died on 15-8-1985. Therefore, she is the absolute owner of the property and the petitioner herein is the tenant. She filed a petition under Section 13(e) of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for eviction of the revision petitioner on the ground that he has denied the title of the 1st respondent herein. It is also her case that the petitioner has set up an Agreement of Sale dated 14-12-1984 in respect of an extent of Ac.2-50 centswhich was claimed to have been exec...
Md. KutubuddIn Vs. Bhaikar Raja Mitraji Anand Kumar and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD83; 2000(1)ALT83
ORDER1. These five Civil RevisionPetitions are directed against the orders in IA No.210 of 1995 in RCA No.108 of 1988, IA No.208 of 1995 in RCA No.107 of 1988, IA No.206 of 1995 in RCA No. 106 of 1988, IA No.212 of 1995 in RCA No. 109 of 1988 and IA No.214 of 1995 in RCA No.110 of 1988, on the file of senior civil Judge, Vizianagaram dated 20-1-1997 allowing the amendment of pleadings under Order VI, Rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure read with Rule 28 of Civil Rules of Practice. Since common questions of law and fact are involved they are being disposed of by a common order.2. Respondent Nos.1 to 3, who are the landlords, filed eviction petitions against five different tenants, who are the revision petitioners herein, contending that they purchased the building consisting of several portions which are in occupation of the aforesaid tenants by a registered sale deed dated 7-12-1984 as members of Joint Hindu Family. The eviction petitions were dismissed by the Rent Controller, Vizianagaram...
Habeeb Sultana Vs. Mohd. SharfuddIn Khan
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1999
Reported in: 1999(6)ALD232; II(2000)DMC668
1. The unsuccessful plaintiff filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 24-4-1987 passed by the learned Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Warangal, in OS No.52 of 1983.2. She filed the suit for recovery of Mehar amount and for return of jehaz articles to her, mentioning in the plaint inter alia that she was married to the defendant on 1-12-1972 at Hanamkonda and she gave birth to three sons and that her husband through a letter dated 7-1-1983 addressed to her father pronounced triple talaq dissolving the marriage and that later the defendant married another woman by name Azamath Sullhana and therefore, she was entitled to the deferred mehar amounting to Rs.5,000/- and two dinars of the value of Rs.10/- each with interest at 18% per annum and for the return of jehaz articles.3. The defendant while resisting the suit pleaded that the letter dated 7-1-1983was a forged document and that the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant was subsisting and therefor...
P.R. Subbash Chandran Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-1999
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD11; 2000(1)ALT58
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J. 1. The petitioner who is said to be a Journalist has filed this writ petition pro bono publico seeking directions to be given to the State Government 'to submit a report on the steps taken by the Government so far to prevent the exploitation of the patients undergoing surgery either in Corporate Hospitals or in Government Hospitals of Super Specialities in the matter of incurring extra unexpected expenses for purchasing either imported or otherwise of certain equipment or material to be used in connection with the surgeries without any prior intimation or notice making the patients to incur heavy unexpected expenditure amounting to exploitation of such patients and to submit a report making suggestions to take concrete steps to prevent total exploitation or to regulate such situations in future by way of assuming control over the activities of both the Corporate Hospitals and the Government Hospitals of Super Specialities'.2. Though the prayer is prolix an...