Andhra Pradesh Court April 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Hyderabad and Others ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD337; 1999(3)ALT489
ORDERM.S. LIBERHAN, CJ. 1. These appeals will be disposed of by this common order as question of law and facts raised in these appeals on pam matcria facts are common.2. Skeletal facts to dispose of the appeals are taken from Writ Appeal No.449 of 1999. The appellant has entered into an agreement with his recognised labour unions agreeing to consider for appointment against 50% vacancies amongst casual labourers under the Court's order, village electricity workers and labourer supplied by the contractors, other than those employed in 33 abolished categories, on 5-3-1996 resulting in issuing guidelines on 18-5-1997 for filling of 50% existing vacancies as per the guidelines issued in B.P.M.S. No.36 dated 18-5-1997, which provided that the contract labourer other than those engaged in 33 abolished categories would be considered for selection and appointment against 50% of the existing vacancies. Consequently the petitioners were found to be eligible for consideration, in conformity with ...
R. Venkateshwara Rao Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD407; 1999(3)ALT351
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J. 1. Inthis pro bono publico writ petition, the constitutional validity of Section 5(1)(c) as also Section 6 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (Central Act 57 of 1955) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is questioned. Consequential declaration sought for is that no person of foreign origin including Mrs. Sonia Gandhi - 8th respondent herein - with citizenship either by registration or by naturalisation is competent or eligible to become Member of either House of Parliament, the Prime Minister of India or the President of India.2. Mr. R. Venkateswara Rao, a businessman of Hyderabad, filed an affidavit in support of the relief sought for. He pleads that the scheme of Constitution of India does not envisage conferment of citizenship on any foreigner and Part II of the Constitution of India dealing with citizenship employs the meaning that it never intended to grant citizenship to foreigner and that indeed, the paramount intention is to guard this country from alie...
Referring Officer Vs. Sc 1/96 to 32/95 (Annexure-i) Cc No. 1/96 and 59 ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD544; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)818; 1999CriLJ4173
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi and R.M. Bapat, JJ.1. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Khammam invested with powers of Special Court constituted under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') made the reference under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and it is numbered as Crl. RC No.905 and 1084 of 1996 on the file of High Court. The same learned Judge while working as Addl. Sessions Judge at Warangal who was also invested with the powers of Special Court under aforementioned Act had, while reiterating the same reasons, sought for quashing the proceedings at various stages in Sessions Case Nos.3, 4 and 9 of 1996 (on the file of the Special Court under the Act). We will be dealing with that case i.e., Crt. RC No.1084 of 1996 separately. The questions referred by the learned Sessions Judge in Crl. RC No.905 of 1996 are:(1) Whether the Special Court constituted under Section 14 of the ...
Referring Officer Rep. by State of A.P. by Public Prosecutor Vs. Sheka ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALT533; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)688
1. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Khammam invested with powers of Special Court constituted under Section 14 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') made the reference under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and it is numbered as Crl.R.C. No. 905 and 1084 of 1996 on the file of High Court. The same learned Judge while working as Addl. Sessions Judge at Warangal who was also invested with the powers of Special Court under aforementioned Act had, while reiterating the same reasons, sought for quashing the proceedings at various stages in Sessions Case Nos. 3, 4 and 9 of 1996 (on the file of the Special Court under the Act). We will be dealing with that case i.e. Crl.R.C. No. 1084 of 1996 separately. The questions referred by the learned Sessions Judge in Crl.R.C. No. 905 of 1996 are:(1) Whether the Special Court constituted under Section 14 of the Central Act XXXIII of 1989 is empowered...
Pgm Spinning Ltd., Hyderabad and Others Vs. Apsfc, Hyderabad and Anoth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD399; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)778; 1999(3)ALT600; [2000]100CompCas449(AP); 1999CriLJ4205
ORDER1. Both the petitions are interconnected, parties are also same therefore they are decided by this common order.2. Complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioners is sought to be quashed bythese petitions. Two grounds were agitated before this Court for getting the complaint quashed. One of the grounds stated was that the complaint is not maintainable as it-, has been filed beyond time. According to the complaint the cheque was issued on 26th August, 1996, it was presented on 12-12-1996 before the Bank which was dishonoured with the endorsement 'payment stopped by drawer'. Notice was issued by the complainant to the petitioners on 30th December, 1996 which was acknowledged by the petitioners on 31st December, 1996. Complaint was filed on 14th February, 1997. The case of the petitioners is that the statutory period of 15 days for a re-action to the notice would end on 14th January, 1997. This is wrong in view of the fact that under Sectio...
Vulliveeraraju Vs. M. Narasimha Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD573
ORDERM.S. Liberhan, CJ.1. It is painful to note that this is one of the instances of vexatious litigation which brings justice system itself to ridicule.2. For the sake of convenience we refer the parties herein as they are arrayed in WP No. 15674 of 1986.3. The chequered history of the case is that the writ petitioner, while working as a Divisional Forest Officer has intercepted two lorries APN 7891 and APS 2486 on 25-4-1977 for contravening the provisions of the Forest Act and seized them as it was found that they were carrying forest produce. The lorries and the alleged forest produce were released later in compliance with an interim order dated 18-5-1977 passed by this Court in WP No.1275/77 which was finally allowed on 9-12-1977. The respondent No.2, Vulli Veera Raju, has filed a suit OS 56/78 for damages for a sum of Rs.10,150.50 paise inter alia contending that he had suffered a loss of Rs.10,150.50 paise on account of the wrongful seizure and detention of goods due to the negli...
R. Babu (Died) by Lrs. Vs. H.K.N. Ayyanger
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)ALD450; 1999(4)ALT721
ORDER1. This is an appeal preferred by a land-lord plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Asifabud dated 30-10-1987 passed in AS No.6 of 1985. By tlie impugned judgment and decree, the appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court i.e. District Munsif's Court, Sirpur dated 18-2-1985 in OS No.75 of 1983 and consequently dismissed the suit. Hence the plaintiff has come up in this appeal.2. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant strenuously contended that the appellate Court is in error in holding that the suit itself is not maintainable-He submitted that the suit is maintainable, since the property in question is situated outside the Municipal area. Therefore, the impugned judgment and decree are liable to be set aside 3. From a reading of the judgment and decree of the appellate Court, I find that the present appellate filed a suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,275/- towards arrears of rent from 13-10-198...
K. Subramaniam and ors. Vs. Sri Kamakshi Extractions and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)776; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)660; [1999]97CompCas335(AP); 1999CriLJ4231
Bilal Nazki, J. 1. The petitioners are facing trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, before the magistrate. Quashing is sought only on the ground that the complaint does not disclose that the petitioners were responsible for the management of the affairs of thecompany and they were in any way responsible for the financial dealings of the company. It is further stated that no specific averment is made with respect to the present petitioners in the complaint. 2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 3 to 6. It is stated in the complaint that A-3 to A-6 are the directors of the company. It is further stated in the complaint, 'towards the dues and in part payment thereof, the second accused on behalf of the first accused with the consent of A-3 to A-6 got issued a cheque bearing No. 12774, dated September 28, 1996, for Rs. 1,25,000 and bearing No. T. No. 12773, dated September 28, 1996, for Rs. 1,25,000'. It is submitted that, on the basis of the assertions made in the...
M. Narasimha Rao Vs. Vulli Veerraju and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALT569
M.S. Liberhan, C.J.1. It is painful to note that this is one of the instances of vexatious litigation which brings justice system itself to ridicule.2. For the sake of convenience we refer the parties herein as they are arrayed in W.P. No. 15674/86.3. The chequered history of the case is that the writ petitioner, while working as a Divisional Forest Officer has intercepted two lorries APN 7891 and APS 2486 on 25-4-1977 for contravening the provisions of the Forest Act and seized them as it was found that they were carrying forest produce. The lorries and the alleged forest produce were released later in compliance with an interim order dated 18-5-1977 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 1275/77 which was finally allowed on 9-12-1977. The respondent No. 2, Vulli Veera Raju, has filed a suit O.S. 56/78 for damages for a sum of Rs. 10,150.50 paise inter alia contending that he had suffered a loss of Rs. 10,150.50 paise on account of the wrongful seizure and detention of goods due to the negl...
Sri Shiva Shakthi Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Engineer-in-chief (Adm. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-20-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD280; 1999(3)ALT304
ORDER1. The Letter No.Rc.ENC. ADA/TC.3/20233/97, dated 22-1-1998 written by the first respondent to the petitioner-firm cancelling its registration as a Special Class Contractor and debarring it from tendering in all categories in future is impugned in this writ petition. The petitioner-firm got itself registered as a Special Class Contractor in the year 1989. It claims to have executed various civil works worth over Rs.20 crores of the Government and its agencies. It appears that serious differences arose between one of the Directors of the petitioner-firm and the-then Chief Engineer, D. Sreerama Murthy (for short the said 'Chief Engineer') with regard to awarding works relating to widening the Mahabubghat in KM.256/710 to 263 NM-7 of Nagpur-Hyderabad Section. One of the Directors of the petitioner-firm appears to have levelled certain serious allegations against the said Chief Engineer, by loading a representationbefore the Government. However, the petitioner-firm appears to have wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »