Andhra Pradesh Court February 1999 Judgments

Avula Contractions Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad and Another Vs. Senior Divi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(3)ALD105; 1999(3)ALT236

ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by M/s. Avula Construction Pvt. Ltd., fora declaration that the award of the work 'Additions and Alterations to the existing 25 KV over head equipment in Guntur Yard at South end of Vijayawada Division on South Central Railway in connection with extension of Road Nos.2 and 6' to the second, respondent pursuant to the Tender Notice dated 26-8-1998 as arbitrary and illegal.2. The 1st petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act and engaged in construction works and in particular, execution of electrical, engineering and fabrication of railway traction works. The 2nd petitioner is a qualified Engineer with vast experience of 16 years in various aspects of overhead equipments, in particular, with railway electrical works. Initially, the 1st petitioner was a Partnership Firm and later on it was converted into a Private Limited Company and they executed various projects worth Rs.600 lakhs.3. The first respondent issued the Tender notice dated...

Paresh Shah Vs. Vyjayanthimala

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(3)ALD542; 1999(2)ALT85

ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J.1. Heard, CMP No.26305 of 1998, filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC, is allowed.2. Both the parties filed compromise petition in CMP No.1743 of 1999 requesting the Court to grant decree of divorce by consent. Few facts that are necessary fordisposing of this appeal arc, Paresh Shah and Vyjayantimala were married on 16-4-1994 as per the provisions of the Special Marriage Act. 1954. They set up their marital home at H.No.7112/26, Cement Building, Kalasiguda, Secundcrabad, along with the parents and other family members of the appellant-husband. According to the respondent-wife, she married the appellant against her wish and under compulsion of her parents. The marriage between the parties is an arranged one. The respondent stated that she was earlier engaged to a better person, and though she spent her time with that gentleman in Gujarat, she had cancelled the engagement. According to the appellant, the respondent failed to carry out the marital obligations, an...

M/S. Sudha Agro Oil and Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. National Insuranc ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. Counsel for the complainant, Mr. V.L.N.G.K. Murthy, is not present. No representation on his behalf. The opposite parties i.e., National Insurance Company Limited at Calcutta, at Hyderabad, and at Kakinada, filed a common counter on 7.10.1993 itself. They filed also an additional counter on 24.6.1994 and number of documents sought to be relied upon by them, on 27.8.1998. For the complainant reply affidavit was filed on 19.7.1994. On 27.8.1998 we gave time to both sides till 23.12.1998 to file true and correct copies of all documents sought to be relied upon by them, list of witnesses, and affidavit evidence of witnesses sought to be examined after serving copies of the same on the other side Counsel and also observing that no further time would be granted for that purpose. In spite of that the Counsel for the complainant has not filed any further documents nor any list of witnesses nor any affidavit evidence of witnesses sought to be relied upon by the co...

Lagadapati Chandrasekhar Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

K. Ranga Rao, Member: 1. This is a complaint filed under Section 17(a) read with Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with the following allegations. 2. The complainant is a resident of Kakinada in East Godavari District and the owner of the mechanised fishing Pablotype boat bearing No. KKD 1681 which was constructed in 1986. The said boat was registered at Kakinada Port and the complainant has been paying the registration charges every year. The complainant insured the said boat with the New India Assurance Company Limited Branch at Kakinada (opposite party) and obtained a Marine Hull Insurance Policy No. 82581/2/0269/131 for the period from 24.12.1987 to 23.3.1988 for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- and the premium is Rs. 1,073/-. After coming to know .that there is potentiality for fishing in Bhairavapalem of Kakinada the complainant after making necessary preparations for fishing, conducted operations on the evening of 1.3.1988. Again on the next day i.e. on 2.3.1988 at about 3....

Convenor, Lawcet, 98, Shri Padmavati Mahila Vishwa Vidyalayam, Tirupat ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)ALD55

ORDER1. Heard.2. This Court by an order dated 4-11-1998 issued ex parte interim directions directing the respondents viz., the Principal, P.B. Siddardha Law College, Vasantha Nagar, Vijayawada and the Registrar, Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District to provide admission to the petitioner into III year B.L. Degree course commencing from 1998 in the 1st respondent college. In effect the petitioner is directed to be admitted into III year B.L. Degree course in the 1st respondent college. It is this order that is sought to be vacated by the Convener,,LAWCET-98.3. I do not propose to go into the merits of the case and decide as to whether the petitioner is entitled for any relaxation in the qualifying marks in the LAWCET on par with the SC and ST candidates but proceed to decide as to whether this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can pass any interlocutory order compelling the University/College to admit any student during...

Sanmathi Udyog, Hyd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(2)ALD625; 2000(3)ALT334

ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J. 1. The petitioner questions the penalty orders dated 3-11-1999 and 5-11-1999 passed bythe second respondent for the years 1991-92 and 1992-93 in purported exercise of power under Section 7-A(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act on the ground that the petitioner-assessee pressed into service fake bills and fabricated entries in the books of accounts to support the claim for exemption on the score of being a second seller. Earlier, the second respondent revised the assessments for the years 1991-92 and 1992-93 by his orders dated 22-1-1997 and 20-5-1997 in exercise of his powers under Section 20 read with Section 14(4-C) of the Act and withdraw the exemption granted by the assessing authority (first respondent). As a sequel to these orders passed in exercise of revisional power, the impugned penalty orders were passed subsequently.2. It is clear from sub-section (2) of Section 7-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act that the power thereunde...

D. Venkata Reddy Vs. Principal, P.B. Sidhardha Law College and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1999AP166

ORDERB. Sundershan Reddy, J.Heard.1. This Court by an order dated 4-11-1998 issued ex pane interim directions directing the respondents viz., the Principal, P.B. Siddardha Law College, Vasantha Nagar, Vijayawada and the Registrar, Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District to provide admission to the petitioner into III year B. L. Degree course commencing from 1998 in the 1st respondent-college. In effect, the petitioner is directed to be admitted into III year B. L. Degree course in the 1st respondent-college. It is this order that is sought to be vacated by the Convener, LAWCET-98.2. I do not propose to go into the merits of the case and decide as to whether the petitioner is entitled for any relaxation in the qualifying marks in the LAWCET on par with the SC and ST candidates but proceed to decide as to whether this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can pass any interlocutory order compelling the University/College to ad...