Andhra Pradesh Court February 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yettlapalle Sidda Reddy Vs. Kona Venkatramana
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1998
Reported in: 1999(3)ALD695; 1999(2)ALT231
1. The appellant herein is the plaintiff who had instituted the suit OS No.446 of 1986 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur for recovery of certain amounts due under promissory note dated 10-4-1983. The suit promissory note is alleged to have been executed by the respondent herein (Defendant in the suit) in favour of the appellant-plaintiff. The trialCourt on evidence decreed the suit of the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial Court in OS No.46 of 1986 the defendant-respondent herein carried the matter in appeal by filing AS No.52 of 1992 on the file of the Addl. District Judge, Madanapalle. The learned Judge allowed the appeal preferred by the defendant and set aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in OS No.446/86. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree in AS No.52/ 92, the plaintiff-appellant herein has filed this Second Appeal.2. Sri C. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant...
Mehmood Hayath Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-13-1998
Reported in: I(1998)ACC534; 1998(2)ALD657; 1998(3)ALT134
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J 1. An inartislically drafted notification issued by the State Government under Section 9 of the A.P. Motor Vehicle Taxation Act has given rise to this litigation between the transport operators and the Transport Department.'2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners question the action of the respondents viz. the officials of Transport Department in not accepting the tax for seven days as per G.O.Ms.No.142, Transport, R & B (Tr-II) dated 22-8-1995 and seek a direction to the respondents concerned to accept the tax for seven days as per the said G.O. in respect of the Petitioners' vehicles.3. The petitioners are owners of All India Tourist Vehicles based in Karnataka and other States, having permits under Section 88(9) of the Motor Vehicles Act. Such permits were issued by the State Transport Authority of Karnataka etc. and they are valid in Andhra Pradesh State also. It is the case of the petitioners that they ply their vehicles intermittently. It is t...
Valluri Veerabhadra Rao and Others Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Sp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-13-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)ALD129; 1998(3)ALT27
ORDERV. Rajagopala Reddy, J.1. Since all these appeals arise out of the same notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act') and the Award No.2/89, dated 28-2-1989, they are disposed of by a common judgment as under.2. These appeals are directed against two separate judgments of the learned Subordinate Judge, Peddapuram, dated 10-2-1997, in two batches of O.Ps., the 1st batch comprising OPs. 150, 148, 151 and 157 of 1989 and the 2nd batch comprising OPs. 149 and 156 of 1989.3. A total extent of Ac. 80.28 cts., was sought to be acquired in Ramanayyapeta village of Yeleswaram Mandal for submergeable area under Yeleru Reservoir Project, Yeleswaram. The total extent, however, involved in these appeals is Ac. 70.53 cts. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published on 6-9-1988. An extent of Ac. 40.56 cts., belongs to the claimantsclaiming each 1/4 share, in the first batch of OPs. They arc appellants in A.S. Nos.822, 825, 826 and 835 of 1...
Kotha Dass Goud Vs. Returning Officer and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD118; 1998(2)ALT604
ORDERD. Redeppa Reddi, J. 1. One of the contesting candidates, viz., Sri Kotha Doss Goud, from 41-Nalgonda Parliamentary Constituency, the election of which is scheduled to be held on 22nd February, 1998 is the petitioner herein. Admittedly, he was convicted for offences under Sections. 450, 395, 397, 326, 324 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo two years imprisonment. He was released from jail on 17-12-1994 after serving out the sentence, yet, he filed his nomination before the first respondent, the Returning Officer of the above referred constituency, on 28-1-1998, suppressing the fact of hjs conviction and undergoing imprisonment for a period of two years in the affidavit and the proforma for furnishing information under Section 8 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act') he has signed and filed along with his nomination papers. The scrutiny of all the nominations filed was conducted on 29-1-1998. However, for want of information a...
Sims College of Physiotherapy, Guntur Vs. University of Health Science ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD499; 1998(4)ALT447
ORDER1. This is the second round of litigation. In the first round of litigation the petitioner-College filed writ petition No.6278/97 questioning the action of the respondent herein in refusing to grant affiliation to the College for starting Physiotherapy course after obtaining necessary directions from the Government for the academic year 1996-97 vide G.O.Ms.No.404, dated 20-02-1996.2. Having heard the matter at length, by order dated 9-4-1997 this Court declared the action of the respondent/University as illegal and having set aside the letter of the respondent dated 11-3-1997 issued a consequential direction to the University to send the inspection team and take further action on the basis of the report within a period of 6 weeks from that date and communicate final orders passed on the application to the petitioner-College. Keeping the fact that the petitioner-College admitted students for the academic year 1996-97 in anticipation of the orders granting affiliation by the respond...
Paruchuri Vasu Vs. General Manager, 7-star Buildings, Vijayawada and o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD427; 1998(3)ALT256
1. A Tender notice was issued on 26-9-1997. Tenders were called for supply of labour in the Telecom office, Exchanges etc. for the purpose of cleaning, sweeping, house-keeping and security etc. The tenders which were received and the rates quoted by them are given below :(1) M/s. Kamaraj Constructions,Vijayawada -- Rs.41/-(2) Sri N.Bala Raju,Vijayawada -- Rs.47/-(3) Sri P. Vasu, Benz circle,Vijayawada - Rs.52/-(4) M/s. G. Seetaiah & CompanyKhammam - Rs.56/-(5) SriG.LakshmiPrasad,Vijayawada - Rs.6l.29ps(6) Sri P. Ram Mohana Rao,Gollapudi Vijayawada - Rs.64/(7) M/s. Rajeswara Rao & Party,Vijayawada - Rs.69.75/-The petitioner quoted Rs.52/- as wages per a labour which was third lowest amongst the contenders. The petitioner submits that M/s. Kamaraj Constructions and Sri N. Bala Raju had quoted the wages of Rs.41/- and 47/- respectively which were lesser than the minimum wages fixed by the Government of India. They could not be allowed to pay to the labour engaged by them a wage which was ...
Color Coats, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad Vs. Venkataramana Hotels Ltd, Ban ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD496; [1998]94CompCas630(AP)
ORDER1. This is an application under Section 433E and 434(1)(A) read with Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up the respondent-company.2. The admitted facts in short are that the petitioner company carries on the business of painting work and at the request of the respondent company it had done painting work amounting to Rs. 16,91, 167-42 ps. and the respondent company paid an amount of Rs.12,53,634.98 ps. in 25 installments.3. The case of the petitioner company in brief is that on 11-5-1991 the respondent company had paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/-and thereafter it did not pay any amount. Therefore, on 21-9-1991 the petitioner company sent a letter demanding the outstanding amount, to which the respondent company replied vide tetter dated 21-10-1991 that within a months time the claim would be settled. Again on 25-10-1991 and on 13-1-1992 demands were made through demand notices. But the respondent company did not reply. Therefore, on 12-8-1994 the petitioner company sent a...
T. Sarojamma Alias Saroja Bai Vs. Mohammed Khaleelur Rahiman and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD586; 1998(2)ALT423
ORDER1. This application is filed to bring the legal representatives of the sole deceased respondent on record. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition it was stated that the sole respondent died on 7-4-1996 leaving behind the respondents named in the affidavit. It was further stated that the above information as to the demise of the sole respondent was brought to the notice of the petitioner only recently. However, learned Counsel for the respondent, who was engaged pending the appeal prior to the demise of the respondent, submitted that the information regarding the demise of the sole respondent was already conveyed to the erstwhile Counsel of the petitioner by a letter sent by registered post to him. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has now fairly conceded before me that a letter was addressed to the Counsel for the petitioner on 10-5-1996 informing the demise of the sole respondent.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in OS No.75/84 on the file of the II Additional Distri...
Verireddy Narsimha Reddy Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD527; 1998(3)ALT420
1. These writ petitions are disposed of by a common order as in all the petitions it has been prayed that the Union of India be directed to place the applications for grant of Freedom Fighters' pension before the Screening Committee constituted by the Government for the purpose.2. This Court has entertained petitions in hundreds in the past and now fresh petitions have been filed. Earlier this Court passed orders in the petitions when no counter was filed. When those petitions were taken up the Court was informed that the Screening Committee was in existence, therefore the Court directed in all those matters that theapplications of the petitioners be placed before the Screening Committee. When these matters came up before this Court, the Court was informed that the Screening Committee is no longer in existence, therefore respondents were directed to file counter. A counter has been filed which has been adopted for all the petitions.3. The Freedom Fighters' Pension Scheme was promulgate...
Paruchuri Vasu Vs. the General Manager, Telecom and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-1998
Reported in: AIR1998AP154
ORDERBilal Nazki, J.1. A Tender notice was issued on 26-9-1997. Tenders were called for supply of labour in the Telecom office, Exchanges etc., for the purpose of cleaning, sweeping, house-keeping and security etc. The tenders which have received and the rates quoted by them are given below :--1)M/s. Kamaraj Constructions, Vijayawada--Rs. 41/-2)Sri N. Bala Raju, Vijayawada--Rs. 47/-3)Sri P, Vasu, Benz circle, Vijayawada--Rs. 52/-4)M/s. G. Seetaiah & Company, Khammam--Rs. 56/-5)Sri G. Lakshmi Prasad, Vijayawada--Rs. 61.29 ps.6)Sri P. Ram Mohana Rao, Gollapudi Vijayawada--Rs. 64/-7)M/s. Rajeswara Rao & Party, Vijayawada--Rs. 69.75 ps.The petitioner quoted Rs. 52/- as wages per a labour which was third lowest amongst the contenders. The petitioner submits that M/s. Kamaraj Constructions and Sri N. Bala Raju had quoted the wages of Rs. 41/- and 47/- respectively which were lesser than the minimum wages fixed by the Government of India. They could not be allowed to pay to the labour engaged...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »