Andhra Pradesh Court November 1998 Judgments

E. Lakshmanna Vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company L ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant whose complainant C.D.C. No. 167/ 1996 before the Chittoor District Forum was dismissed by order dated 3.10.1998 by that Forum. The opposite parties in that C.D.C. are the respondents before us. 2. The case of the complainant is that his vehicle i.e., tractor and trailor assembly bearing Registration Nos. ATC-2192 and ATC-2193 respectively, was insured with the opposite parties i.e. United India Insurance Company Limited on 28.8.1994 and that the said vehicle during the policy was in force was involved in an accident on 22.6.1995 and was damaged in that accident. He laid a claim on the Insurance Company for Rs. 31,065/- towards purchase of spares, Rs. 5,000/- towards tinkering and painting charges and also Rs. 8,000/- towards labour charges i.e. in all Rs. 44,065/-. The Insurance Company appointed a Surveyor and, after receiving the report of the Surveyor, it repudiated the claim of the complaina...

Pilli Nageswara Rao and Others Vs. Vice-chairman and Managing Director ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD184; 1999(1)ALT251

ORDER1. As the subject matter of these two writ petitions being the same, they can be disposed off by a common order. These two writ petitions are filed for issuance of a writ of ceriiomri calling for the records relating to selection and appointment of drivers in APSRTC, East Godavari Region in February, 1997 and quash the same as illegal as the selections are vitiated by mala fides and undue favour was conferred on the candidates belonging to the caste of the Chairman of the selection Committee. Such an action being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the same is liable to be struck down by this Court.2. The factual matrix of these two cases are that the Executive Director, APSRTC, Vizianagaram zone sought permission of the Vice-Chairman & Managing Director, to prepare a panel of 200 drivers in Grade-Ill for East Godavari region in his letter dated 29-7-1996. While giving permission to recruit 89 drivers, the VC & MD seemed to have constituted a Selection Committee ...

Madamanchi Sreenivasa Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD601; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)312; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)198

ORDERA. Hanumanthu, J.1. The sole accused-Madamanchi Srinrvasa Rao in SC No.490 of 1993 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, is the appellant herein. He was tried for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 302 and 201 IPC. The substance of the charges against the accused is that on 11-11-1991 the accused kidnapped one Kalluri Prashant aged about 13 years, caused his death by typing a nylon rope around his neck and then by keeping the dead body in a gunny bag, threw the same in the branch canal with an intention of screening the said offence.2. The case of the Prosecution, in brief, is as follows:(I) The deceased-Prashant is the son and the accused is the son-in-law of PW1. The accused married the daughter of PW1 about one year three months prior to the date of the incident i.e., 11-11-1991. The accused is a native of Abbineniguntapalem, but he was residing at Yedlapadu since three months prior to 11-11-1991. PWs. 1, 3, to 9 are also residents of Yedlapadu. The...

Kudupudi Lakshmi Veera Venkatarathnam Vs. Kudipudi Sri Krishna Vara Pr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)ALD4; 1999(1)ALT778; II(1999)DMC268

ORDER1. This petition is filed by the decree holder. The decree-holder is the wifeof the first respondent. She has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 30-9-1996 passed in EP No.148 of 1992 in OS No.12 of 1968 by which her execution petition was dismissed on the ground that her decree has become nullity and nonexecutable. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the relationship between the petitioner and the first respondent as husband and wife is admitted. It is also admitted that the suit filed by the wife in OS No.12 of 1968 has been decreed on a compromise and according to the compromise the judgement - debtor shall take the decree-holder to his house and maintain her and if for any reason the decree-holder could not live with the judgment-debtor, the decree-holder by serving a registered notice to the judgment-debtor can claim maintenance under the decree. It is no doubt true that the wife lived with the husband after the decree in terms of the...

M. Ravi, Tiruchy, Tamilnadu Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(6)ALD734; 1998(6)ALT638

ORDER1. In all these writ petitions the action of the first respondent, the management of the Timmala Tirupathi Devastanams (for short T.T.D,'), in granting licence to run the canteen specified in clauses (a) and (b) of the Notification in favour of the second respondent in WP No.31277, and granting licence to nm the canteen in respect of canteen (c) of the Notification in favour of the third respondent iii WP No.31252 of 1998 is called in question. The details of the canteens arc set out in the Tender Notification dated 9-6-1998 issued by the Executive Officer of the T.T.D.2. The Petitioner in WP No.31252 of 1998 is a non-applicant. It is his case that when he read the Tender Notification dated 9-6-1998 issued by the Executive Officer of the T.T.D. in daily news papers calling for applications for prcqualification for 10 years for running tliree canteens mentioned in the Notification, wanted to apply for the grant of licence, but he realised that he did not possess the prescribed elig...

East India Transport Agency and Another Vs. M.S.C.D. Zarda Works

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. his is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties in O.P. No. 551/1994 on the file of the Hyderabad District Forum-II questioning the order of that Forum dated 22.9.1998 directing them to pay to the complainant Rs. 52,795/- with interest at 18% per annum from 1.9.1993 till the date of payment and costs of Rs. 500/- for the loss of the goods entrusted to them by the complainant for transport. The complainant in the O.P. is the respondent in the appeal. 2. The admitted facts are that 11 cartons of Charminar Quiwam and one parcel containing advertisement material was en trusted to the 2nd appellant for transport to Calcutta under consignment note dated 9.5.1992 showing the value of the goods as Rs. 52,795/-. The freight charges of Rs. 1,859/- were to be paid on receipt of the goods at Calcutta. The consignment was rebooked from Calcutta to Hyderabad on 13.8.1992. That is not disputed by the appellants in their counter filed before the District Forum. Their ...

Killamsetti Narayana Rao and Others Vs. Ajantha Real Estate, Srikakula ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD93; 1999(1)ALT135

ORDER1. The order of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam issued in IANo.135 of 1998 in OS No.122 of 1996 dated 13-10-1998 is impugned in this revision.2. From the above order it is seen that one V. Sarveswararao claiming to be the Managing Partner of the plaintiff firm i.e., Ajantha Real Estate, filed IA No.135 of 1998 seeking amendment of the plaint schedule and after giving an opportunity to the appellant herein, that application was allowed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge by orders dated 13-10-1998.3. Heard both the learned Counsels.4. The sole ground on which this revision petition is filed is that V. Sarveswararao is a stranger to the suit and as such the application seeking amendment of the plaint schedule at his instance cannot be maintained in law. The learned Counsel for the respondent produced the partnership deed dated 25-7-1996 and as per the rest of the terms of the deed V. Sarveswararao is one of the partners of the firm. The case of the petitioner is that ...

Sri Bheema Oil Mills and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)43; 1999(1)ALT690

T. Ranga Rao, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 29-8-1996 in Crl. Appeal No. 37/93 on the file of the Sessions Judge, nanthapur.2. The facts in giving rise to the filing of this revision are, briefly, as follows:-The first petitioner, M/s. Sri Bheema Oil Mills, Bangalore Cross Road, Ananthapur, is a registered firm and the second petitioner Ambati Venugopal Reddy is its Managing partner. P.W.I Mahboob Jan, Food Inspector, inspected the said mill premises on 21-12-1990 at about 11-00 a.m. along with P.W.2, Santha Murthy, the mediator and found 57,090, Kgs. of groundnut kernal kept in a big heap and also found groundnut oil and he suspected adulteration and purchased 600 Gms. of groundnut kernal from A-2, after issuing Form-VI notice and paying Rs. 7.80 ps. and divided it into three parts, sealed them in empty, dry and clean bottles, as per rules. He also purchased groundnut oil and after complying with the formalities, sealed the samples and sent them for analysi...

M. Vijaya Lakshmi Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. We do not find any merit in this appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant questioning the order of the Hyderabad District Forum-I dated 27.3.1998 dismissing O.P. No. 581/1995. The opposite parties in that O.P. are the respondents before us. 2. The facts clearly do not support the claim of the complainant. The complainant is the nominee under a policy taken in the name of her son M. Arvind Kumar for Rs. 2,00,000/- dated 29.9.1992 (marked as Ex. A.1). The quarterly premium amount was Rs. 2,541/- and it is not in dispute that the premia were being paid regularly. It is also not in dispute that M. Arvind Kumar was a minor at the time when the policy was issued. The learned Counsel for the appellant/ complainant states that M. Arvind Kumar was aged 17 years 5 months and 15 days when the policy was taken. The complainant was paid Rs. 2,35,106/-. The grievance of the complainant was that she was not paid a further sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- on the basis that ...

A. Raghunatha Rao Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD57; 1999(1)ALT39

ORDER1. Heard Mr. Ramana Reddy, senior Counsel for the petitioner, the learned AGP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development and Mr. P. Gangaiah Naidu, the learned Counsel for the 4th Respondent.2. All the Counsels have agreed to dispose of the main writ petition.3. The petitioner has preferred this fourth-writ petition questioning the orders of the 2nd respondent-District Collector (Panchayat-Wing) Krishna District, Machilipatnam bifurcating Marribandam revenue village from the Seetharampuram Gram Panchayat and constituting separate Marribandam Gram Panchayat.4. The admitted facts are that the petitioner is the Ex-Sarpanch and Ex-person-incharge of Seetharampuram Gram Panchayat in Nuzvid Mandal. Seetharampuram Gram Panchayat was constituted in the year 1970 and in pursuance of the proceedings of the Collector in RC No.2620 of 1971, dated 14-4-1972, Marribandam Revenue village was excluded from Mirzapuram Gram Panchayat and included in Seetharampuram Gram Panchayat. The 2nd respondent-Di...