Andhra Pradesh Court January 1998 Judgments

M. Rajender @ Raju Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Home and o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(1)ALD(Cri)253; 1998(2)ALT264

ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J.1. Heard both the Counsel at the stage of admission.2. We are not inclined to say that the learned Government Pleader, Mr. C. Sadasiva Reddy, is not right in opposing the request of the appellant for grant of parole for a period of three months. Suspension of Sentence on Parole Rules, 1981 speak about the power of jail authorities and the Government in considering the request for grant of parole. Rules 15,17 and 22, which are relevant read as under:'15. Denial of parole for a period of three years:- As parole is only a concession and cannot be claimed by a prisoner as a matter of right its denial for any period will not be a penalty.17. The period of release on parole shall not ordinarily exceed one month/ and no further extension shall be granted. The Government shall decide the period of such release on the merits of each case in exceptional circumstances.22. Parole shall not be granted to be a vailed of within the first six months from the date of his admi...

Divisional Manager, Lic of India and Others Vs. T. Venkateshwarlu

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. One T. Sailaja Rani wife of the complainant in OP 351/95, District Forum, Nizamabad took an "Ashadeep policy" from the opposite party Insurance Company for Rs. 1 lakh on 13.11.1993 and paid two half yearly premiums and died on 22.4.1994 due to heart attack at Hyderabad. The complainant who is a nominee and husband preferred a claim. But the opposite parties repudiated its liability. Questioning that the repudiation is illegal and arbitrary, the above complaint was filed to direct the opposite parties to pay the amount covered by the policy with interest etc. 2. The opposite party Insurance Company admitted the issuance of the policy. According to them as the death occurred within six months from the date of commencement of the policy, the case was investigated and the investigation revealed that the assured suffered from Abdominal T.B. from 1.4.1991 to 31.5.1991 and suppressed the same in the proposal submitted on 13.11.1993. Hence the repudiation is...

Transport Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Consumer Awareness Research So ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

S. Parvatha Rao, President: 1. This appeal has been preferred by the opposite party in C.D. No. 687/1994 on the file of Hyderabad District Forum questioning the Forum's order therein dated 9.12.1996 directing the opposite party to pay compensation of Rs. 11,424/- to the second complainant with interest @ 15% per annum thereon from 17.7.1992 and costs of Rs. 1,000/- to both the complainants within one month from the date of the order. 2. The complainants, who are the respondents in this appeal, approached the District Forum complaining that out of 16 boxes containing medicines booked for transport by the appellant from Pattancheru to Panvel in Rayagadh District of Maharastra State for consideration, only 15 boxes were delivered and one was lost and that the medicines in that box and their value was described in the certificate of fact(s) issued in the form of the appellant signed on behalf of the appellant as well as the transferee of the goods, Nakoda Sales Corporation. The entrustment...