Andhra Pradesh Court July 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Ramana Murthy Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Revenue (End ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)ALT769
Lingaraja Rath, J.1. In assailing the order of the learned Single Judge rejecting Writ Petition No. 22651 of 1994 in which challenge was made to the order of appointment of the Executive Officer dated 29-8-1990 as also to the revisional order dated 1-10-1994 dismissing the revision, Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Counsel for the appellant firstly contended of there being no power in the Commissioner of Endowments to appoint the Executive Officer as the power, according to him, vests in the Government alone. It was secondly urged that no appointment of Executive Officer is warranted since the income of the institution is less than Rs. 50,000/-. The last contention of Mr. Rao is that there was no justification for appointment of the Executive Officer as there were no materials to adopt such a course.2. The petitioner is the hereditary trustee of the institution, Sri. Hatakeswara Swamy Temple, Singupuram, Srikakulm Mandal and district. A report was submitted by the Inspector of Endowment...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Waheed Khan and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-1997
Reported in: 1999ACJ831; 1998(1)ALD720; 1998(2)ALT11
ORDERLengaraja Rath, J1. These two appeals raise the same question and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. The parties are referred to as arrayed in the C.M.A.2. The appellant is the Insurance Company who insured respondents covering accidents to their workmen In both the cases the accidents occurred in the Stale of Maharashtra So far as the L.P.A.No.175 of 1994 is concerned, the accident resulted in death of the workman and so far as the C.M.A. is concerned, the accident resulted in injuries to the workman. Cases under the workman's Compensation Act were filed before the Workmen Compensation Commissioner at Ranga Reddy District by the legal representatives of the dead workman and by the workman himself respectively. Their cases being allowed and compensation awarded the appeals were filed. So far as the death case is concerned, C.M.A.No.293 of 1993 was preferred and the appeal having been failed, the present L.P.A. has been preferred. The C.M.A.No.293 of 1993, arising out o...
Vijay Fire Protection Systems Ltd. Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Trust and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-1997
Reported in: AIR1998AP66
ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of Mandamus declaring tghe action of the respondents in termination Work-order dated : 28-12-1996 as arbitrary, illegal, malafide and unjust.2. The petitioner is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of undertaking turnkey contracts of fire protection, detection systems. It claims to be one of the most reputed and highly regarded as a specialised fire engineering company in the country and stated to have executed several contracts with Companies such as, NTPC, BHEL, ONGC, ECIL, Bombay Port Trust and New Mangaldre Port Trust. It is stated to have commissioned systems worth about Rs. 200 crore successfully.3. The Visakhapatnam Port Trust (for short 'VPT') invited tenders through open news paper advertisements for design, manufacture, supply delivery; erection, testing and Commissioning of fire fighting facilities for proposed LPG Jetty at Visa...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Waheed Khan and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-1997
Reported in: 1(1998)ACC649
Lingaraja Rath, J.1. These two appeals raise the same question and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. The parties are referred to as arrayed in the C.M.A.2. The appellant is the Insurance Company who insured respondents covering accidents to their workmen. In both the cases the accidents occurred in the State of Maharashtra. So far as the L.P.A. No. 175 of 1994 is concerned, the accident resulted in death of the workman and so far as thy C.M.A. is concerned, the accident resulted in injuries to the workman. Cases under the Workmen's Compensation Act were filed before the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner at Ranga Reddy District by the legal representatives of the dead workman and by the workman himself respectively. Their cases being allowed and compensation awarded, the appeals were filed. So far as the death case is concerned, C.M.A. No. 293 of 1993 (sic.) was preferred and the appeal having been failed, the present L.P.A. has been preferred. The C.M.A. No. 293 of 1993,...
Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Trust an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: AIR1998AP222; 1997(4)ALT778
1. This appeal has arisen from the judgment in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Writ petitioner-appellant has claimed that it is an Engineering Contractors Company which submitted its tender to the Visakhapatnam Port Trust for the construction of a multipurpose Berth in response to the tender notification dated 16-3-1996 issued by the Port Trust. It is alleged, the Port Trust decided not to open or consider the tender submitted by the petitioner in view of the filing of an F.I.R. by the C.B.I., against it and others alleging the commission of certain offences in connection with a different work contract previously executed by the petitioner. The said action, the petitioner-appellant had challenged as amounting of blacklisting the petitioner-appellant without affording any opportunity of being heard to him and merely on the basis of a certain F.I.R.which according to it (the petitioner) is not warranted at all. Thus, the rights of the petitioner under Artic...
Kundoju Venkateswarlu Vs. Kundoju Seetharamaiah and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)ALT476
ORDERR. Bayapu Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is filed questioning the orders of the District Munsif, Kodad dated 28-11-1995 passed in I.A.373/95 in O.S.327/93 dismissing the said petition filed under Order 11 Rule 21 C.P.C. by the defendant, who is the present petitioner.2. The respondents herein had filed the suit O.S. No. 327/93 for the relief of permanent injunction against the present petitioner, who is the defendant in the suit. During the pendency of the suit, the defendant filed LA. No. 257/94 under Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Section 151 C.P.C. requesting the Court to direct the plaintiffs to produce the original partition agreement dated 1-2-1991 said to be in the possession of the plaintiffs. The said petition was allowed by the Court on 22-11-1994 directing the plaintiffs to produce the said document into Court. During the trial of the suit the defendant filed I.A.373/95 under Order 11 Rule 21 CPC requesting the Court to dismiss the suit on the groun...
Prabhulingam Vs. Y. Ramiah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)ALT376
R. Bayapu Reddy, J.1. This revision is filed by the appellant before the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District in case No. B4/12083/90 questioning the orders dt. 8-11-1994 by which the claim of the petitioner for the disputed land was rejected and the claim of the respondents for ownership rights Under Section 38-E of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short 'the Tenancy Act') was upheld confirming the orders of the Additional Revenue Divisional Officer in Case No. 1RW 327/75 dated 21-6-1975.2. The respondents, who are the legal representatives of one Y. Yellaiah, claimed before the Additional Revenue Divisional Officer for issuance of ownership certificate Under Section 38-E of the Tenancy Act in their favour relating to the land in Sy. No. 1 of Sulthanpally village claiming as protected tenants relating to the said land. Their contention is that their father Yellaiah was a protected tenant relating to the said land; that the original own...
Yerra (Varre) Ramachandraiah (Died) and ors. Vs. Mamidala Rambai Alias ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: 1998(4)ALD107
1. The appellants herein were the original defendants in O.S. No.622 of 1978 which was filed in the Court of the District Munsif, Nalgonda by the respondent herein. The plaintiff-respondent herein filed the suit for recovery of the land situated at Pangal village, Nalgonda Taluk, Nalgonda District and for mesne profits. The suit was heard by the trial Court on merits and the suit of the plaintiff came to be dismissed. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.622 of 1978, the plaintiff carried the matter in appeal by filing A.S.No.S of 1987 in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Nalgonda. The learned Judge heard the appeal on merits and allowed the appeal decreeing the suit of the plaintiff Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree, the defendants-appellants herein approached this Court in Second Appeal. 2. The averments made in the plaint can briefly be narrated as follows: The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of suit land situated at Panga...
Andhra Pradesh Arrack Contractors Association Rep. by Its Secretary Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: 1997(5)ALT228
M.H.S. Ansari, J.1. The State Government by its G.O.Rt No. 216, Revenue (Excise-II) Department, dated 11-2-1994 sanctioned an amount of Rs. 3,06,50,000/- (Rupees Three Crores Six Lakhs and fifty thousand only) as Remission of Excise rentals for the months of October, 1992 and November, 1992 worked out on the basis of closure of arrack shops in the State. It is observed in the said G.O. dated 11-2-1994 that the anti-arrack agitation took a violent turn in October 1992 and reached its peak in November, 1992. As a result, arrack shops were forcibly closed during the period when Contractors were just commencing their business at the beginning of the Excise Year immediately after the auctions. The Contractors were persuaded to somehow continue their business on the promise of help subsequently. They had therefore continued their business. On a report submitted by the Commissioner of Excise, that the Arrack contractors affected by anti-arrack agitation have sought remission of rentals for th...
Karri Tulesamma Vs. Poyya Moshen and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1997
Reported in: 1997(5)ALT175
ORDERV. Bhaskara Rao, J.1. This revision petition is filed against the order in IA. No. 362/1994 in O.S. No. 262/1987 on the file of I Additional District Munsif, Tanuku, dated 17-4-1995 refusing amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C.2. A copy of the petition filed along with the material papers in this C.R.P. shows that the amendment became necessary on account of some subsequent developments after the filing of the suit. Therefore, para 10 (a) is proposed to be added. Hence, it begins with the sentence 'Since the date of suit the 2nd defendant abandoned evincing interest in the proposed gift of.....' It is in the affidavit of the revision petitioner that he proposed to gift the suit schedule land to the 2nd respondent and permitted 1st respondent to keep the construction material in the schedule land, but he started encroaching some other land unauthorisedly and hence the suit for permanent injunction was filed. It is further stated that subsequent to the filing of the sui...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »