Andhra Pradesh Court July 1997 Judgments

M. Usanamma and anr. Vs. Principal Secretary to Govt. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(4)ALT687

ORDERM.H.S. Ansari, J.1. Heard Mr. M. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition.2. The petitioners are seeking a Writ in the nature of mandamus for implementation of G.O.No. 270 dt.16-10-1995. By the said Government Order, the Government has permitted the deposit of an amount of Rs. 13.60 lakhs for payment of enhanced compensation for the lands acquired for Gajuladinne Project as per the orders passed in the petitions filed in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Adoni.3. The Petitioner is the owner of land in Survey No. 449 to an extent of Ac.2.82 cents which was acquired pursuant to a notification ordered Under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and Award No. 4/1979 dt.24-7-1979 was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Subsequently, the compensation was enhanced on petition filed Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act by orders dt.11-8-1987 passed in O.P.44/85. Likewise the second petitioners land in Survey No. 21 to an ...

Pothina Pothanna and anr. Vs. Special Deputy Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(4)ALT709

M.H.S. Ansari, J. 1. Heard.2. The petitioners are owners of Agricultural land comprised in Sy. No. 262/20 of Madhuravada (v), Chinagadila Mandalam, Visakhapatnam District. An extent of Ac.5.66 cts was acquired for sites and services under L.E.D. Scheme for VUDA under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. Section 4 declaration was published in A.P. Gazette - Part I Extraordinary Issue No. 226 dated 2-5-1984 and draft declaration Under Section 6 was published on 29-4-1987. The petitioner questioned the validity of the said acquisition and filed W.P.No. 12320 of 1988 which was dismissed on 21-12-1991 and an appeal preferred against the same W.A.No. 52 of 1992 was also dismissed on 5-2-1992 and a Special Leave Petition in the Hon'ble Supreme Court was also dismissed. The petitioner also filed another W.P.No. 4134 of 1993 which was dismissed on 16-7-1993. During the pendency of the said writ petitions, an Award No. 20 of 1988 dated 27-7-1988 was passed by the 1st respondent and the co...

B. Udaya Bhaskara Rao and ors. Vs. Executive Engineer, Municipal Corpo ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(5)ALT159

T.N.C. Ranga Rajan, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the decision of the Municipal Corporation, Rajahmundry suspending the sanction of Plumber licences Under Section 6 of the Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1982 (Act 6 of 1982).2. Rajahmundry was originally only a Municipality and under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, petitioners had been given licences to work as Plumbers. On 16-4-1993 their applications for renewal of the licences were rejected and they filed Writ Petition No. 7321/1993 and by an interim direction their licences were renewed for some time. Thereafter, on 25-3-1995, Rajahmundry was declared as larger urban area Under Section 3 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1994 by G.O.Ms. No. 159, with the result that it became a Corporation. Consequently, on 1-2-1996, Writ Petition No. 7321/1993 was disposed of as infructuous but a direction was given to the Corporation to consider their applications if filed afresh. I...

Karthik Das Vs. Cheera Kumar Swamy and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The complainant in C.D. 194/95, District Forum, Warangal who is working as an Engineer in Sri Ram Sagar Project fixed the date 3.5.1995 for celebrating his daughter's marriage and the venue was fixed at Srinath Function Hall, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda. The marriage was celebrated on a very grand scale. 2. According to the complainant, he gave on 21.4.1995 a demand draft for Rs. 2/587.20 Ps. and an advertisement matter about the performance of his daughter's marriage to the 1st opposite party i.e. Karthik Ads, who collects advertisements on commission basis. The advertisement has to be published in an Edition of Eenabu Telugu Daily Newspaper on 3.5.1995 But, there was no advertisement in Eenadu Newspaper about the marriage function on 3.5.1995. Alleging that, expecting a large number of friends after seeing the advertisement, he got lunch prepared on a large scale sufficient for 600 persons and as the advertisement did not appear on 3.5.1995 many guest...