Andhra Pradesh Court May 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
O. Rama Mohan Reddy Vs. Manager, R.C.M. Schools, Diocese of Cuddapah S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALT271
ORDERY.V. Narayana, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner questions the action of the 2nd respondent in not approving his appointment as B.Ed. Assistant w.e.f. 1-7-1992 and seeks a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to approve his appointment as B.Ed. Assistant with effect from 1-7-1992. It is the contention of the petitioner that by virtue of the orders passed by the 2nd respondent on 28-12-1996, under which the selection of the petitioner was approved, the petitioner had to lose his seniority as persons who are juniors to him and who are interviewed along with the petitioner in the year 1995 were appointed much prior to the appointment of the petitioner and thereby he became junior to those candidates.2. To appreciate the contention of the petitioner, a brief story of the case is relevant to be mentioned. The petitioner was initially appointed on 1-7-1992 as B.Ed. Assistant in the 1st respondent-school in an unaided post and he has been continuously working as such ti...
Navabharath Educational Committee, Rep. by President Vs. P. Venkateswa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALT274
ORDERP. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The petitioner is the tenant. The Landlord filed R.C.C. No. 38 of 1984 for eviction of the tenant and recovery of possession, on the ground that the petitioner had committed wilful default in payment of rent for 63 months and also denied the title of the landlord. Both the tribunals found that the petitioner failed to pay rent for 63 months from 1-3-1979 and a sum of Rs. 22,050/- is due and payable by way of arrears of rent. It is also further found that the petitioner had denied title of the landlord claiming right of permanent tenancy.2. Sri M.P. Chandramouli, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has informed the fourth respondent-P. Dakshnamurthy, who is acting on behalf of the landlord that he had spent more than three lakhs rupees for improvement of the property and the fourth respondent expressed his willing...
United Steel Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Fairgrowth Financial Serv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALT295; [1998]94CompCas212(AP)
P.S. Mishra, C.J. 1. The appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent which has arisen out of an application in the petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as the petition are posted together and have since been heard together. 2. Since the main writ petition has been heard and is being disposed of, no order in the appeal is required except to record that the same has become infructuous. 3. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in the city of Hyderabad. According to its version, it approached the first respondent, Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd., Bangalore, for a short-term loan. The first respondent on January 20, 1992, informed the petitioner that its request for a short-term loan was sanctioned for a sum of Rs. 1.10 crores subject to the conditions and terms as mentioned in the letter of acceptance of the request of borrowing. According to the petitioner, it placed five lakh shares of Rs. 10 ea...
Md. Abdul Azeez Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Its Managing Director and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALT743
ORDERR. Bayapu Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus for declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Lr. No. L1/876 (S2)/96-RM (O), dated 30-1-1997 declaring the petitioner unfit for A-2 category as arbitrary and unjust and to direct the respondents to appoint him in the post of Conductor/ Cleaner/Helper or any other suitable post in the service of the Respondent - A.P.S.R.T.C. (for short 'the Corporation').2. The contention of the petitioner is that he worked as Conductor on a private vehicle bearing registration No. AAE-4381 owned by one Sri Chevali Mohan Rao from August, 1984 to 10-9-1996 (sic 10-9-1986). The said vehicle was plying in the route Kanigiri to Kondapi and it was nationalised with effect from 10-9-1986 and he is a graduate possessing the requisite qualification to be appointed as Conductor in the Corporation due to nationalisation of the above said route. As the petitioner was not absorbed in the service of the Corporation, after the ...
Mohd. Mahmood, Attender, Munsif Magistrate Court Vs. District and Sess ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALT597
S. Parvatha Rao, J.1. The petitioner seeks a writ of Certiorari quashing the order in proceedings Dis. No. 3267/97/A-1, dated 21-4-1997 of the 1st Respondent i.e., the District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District, imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement on him with effect from 30-4-1997.2. Even though the petitioner could have preferred an appeal against the said order to the 2nd respondent i.e. the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, without availing that alternative remedy he approached this Court directly by way of the present Writ Petition. We asked the learned Counsel for the petitioner as to why the petitioner had not resorted to the alternative relief available to him. The learned Counsel stated that the order of the 1st respondent was perverse and his findings were not supported by any material on record and as it was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and consequently of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, because the petitioner was deprived of his livelihood by t...
P. Babaiah Vs. Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, Finance Dept. and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALT716
S. Parvatha Rao, J.1. The petitioner in this Writ Petition was appointed as full time Masalchi under Proceedings dated 15-3-1985 by the Munsif Magistrate, Hyderabad East and North basing on the Proceedings of the 2nd respondent, dated 26-5-1985 and proceedings in Memo Dis. No. 1402/85-A, dated 13-3-1985 of the 3rd respondent i.e. the District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroornagar, and he has been continuously working since then as a full time Masalchi. He was also paid the remuneration at Rs. 740/- per month pursuant to G.O.Ms. No. 344, Finance and Planning (FW.PRC.III) Department, dated 13-11-1989 with effect from 16-3-1990 as he completed five years of service as on 15-3-1990 and satisfied the other requirements of the said G.O. He contends that he is covered by G.O. (P) No. 259, Finance and Planning (FW.PC.II) Department, dated 18-6-1993 and the post in which he has been working has to be converted into a regular Government post in the last grade service as per the said G.O. wi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›