Andhra Pradesh Court November 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.L. Kantha Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD448; 1998(1)ALT632
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J 1. Inthis batch of Writ Petitions, the correct age of retirement of the teaching staff employed in Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam-run Educational Institutions is in issue.2. The petitioners seek a declaration that the provisions of A.P. Education (Amendment) Act No. 17 of 1993 by which the age of superannuation of the staff in aided private educational institutions was prescribed at 58 years does not apply to the colleges run by the Management of Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (for short 'TTD'). The proceedings issued by the Commissioner of Collegiate Education and the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Cuddapah in July, 1993 intimating the Managements of the aided private, Junior and Degree Colleges including T.T.D. Colleges that the age of retirement was 58 years and, therefore, the teachers who were continuing in service on the date of commencement of ordinance (which was later replaced by the Act) should be retired from service with effect from ...
Dr. P.R. Krishna Reddy and Another Vs. Director, National Remote Sensi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(4)ALD577; 1997(6)ALT614
ORDER1. The petitioners in this Writ Petition seek regularisation of their services. The 1st respondent is a Society registered underthe Societies Registration Act, admittedly a wing of the Central Government. It hadadvertised for the posts of Project Scientists, the minimum qualification being M.Sc. or M.A. in the relevant subject. The post was purely temporary for a period of one year against a Project and carried a consolidated monthly salary. The petitioners applied for the posts. The 1st petitioner was appointed on 4-9-1991 and the 2nd petitioner on 4-8-1991 as ProjectScientists (Geography). Their term was extended for a further period of one year and subsequent extensions were given. Later, on 6-6-1994, they were appointed on contract basis with periodical extensions upto 2-12-1995 in the case of the 1st petitioner and upto 30-11-1995 in the case of the 2nd petitioner. The petitioners claim that conversion of the jobs into a contract was only a camouflage for the purpose of defea...
D.K. Yadav Vs. Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALT206
ORDERT.N.C. Rangarajan, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the termination of the services of the petitioner.2. The petitioner has been enlisted in the Central Industrial Security Force as a Police Constable on 28-9-1989. While he was working in Hyderabad he received a telegram on 3-9-1993 that his wife who had gone to Haryana for delivery was seriously ill and his child had also died. He accordingly made an application for leave to the Company Commandant. After his duty hours which were from 5 a.m. to 1 p.m. were over, he went in the evening at 5-45 p.m. to the Deputy Commandant office in civil dress to enquire about his leave application. The Sub-Inspector gave him a file with instructions to place it before the Deputy Commandant for sanction. He, therefore, went to the room of the P. A. to the Deputy Commandant. At that time another Sub- Inspector who was in civil dress entered the room and questioned the presence of the petitioner in civil dress as there was a rule that no...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›