Andhra Pradesh Court March 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vettikuti Naydamma (Died) and ors. Vs. Mupparaju Madhusudhana Rao and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT185
ORDERKrishna Saran Shrivastav, J.1. The petitioners in this revision are the plan tiffs in O.S.No. 19 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Bapatla.2. This revision shall also dispose of the Civil Revision Petitions No. 2164 and 2167 of 1995 because of commonality of question of law and similarity of facts.3. The facts giving rise to these revisions, in brief, are that - the deceased 1st plantiff was the husband of the deceased 2nd plantiff. The deceased 1st plaintiff was the owner of the suit properties. He filed O.S.Nos. 18, 19 and 20 of 1985 against separate defendant in these suits for cancellation of the gift deeds in respect of the suit properties alleged to have been executed by him in favour of the defendant on the ground that he suffered a paralysis attack some time in the month of December, 1985 and became physically handicapped and lost his speech. At that time he was staying alone in his house because the 2nd plaintiff since deceased had abandoned him about thirteen...
Vanga Narsaiah and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT281
ORDERV. Rajagopala Reddy, J.1. The petitioners moved this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ declaring the award dated 22-9-1986 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, 2nd respondent herein, as illegal and void and for a direction to initiate fresh notification Under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act').2. Originally the writ petition was filed by 68 persons. Since some of the petitioners subsequently died, their LRs have been added as petitioners69to91. The petitioners are illiterate, poor and small farmers, including Harijans. Each of the petitioners owns a small piece of land, in Muthyampet and Domakonda villages. Their lands of an extent of Ac. 22 have been acquired for the purpose of formation of percolation tank across Pochamma vagu. The Land Acquisition Officer has taken possession of the lands in 1981 as per his counter, but as per the petitioners, during 1978 itself, much prior to Section 4(1) Notification, in any event,...
Keelu Papa Rao Vs. the Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, And ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: AIR1997AP46
ORDERLingaraja Rath, J. 1. The appellant 'who was the 4th respondent in the Writ Petition No. 8658 of 1990 out of which the appeal arises has preferred the appeal assailing the judgment of the learned single Judge directing the Controller of Examinations, Andhra University, respondent No. 2, herein, and also the Principal, Maharaj's College for Men, Vizianagaram (respondent No. 2 in the writ petition and respondent No. 3 to the appeal) not to declare the result of the appellant for B.Sc., course and to cancel his admission in the College. The appellant who also aggrieved by the fact that the judgment confirmed the order of respondent No. 1 declaring the appellant not to have passed the Intermediate Examination and to have failed in the examination and directing the appellant to return the Intermediate Pass Certificate and directing respondent No. 3 to return the Intermediate Pass Certificate of the appellant if he was having the certificate in his custody.2. The facts of the case, as h...
Annam Jewellers Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: [1996]102STC506(AP)
S. Parvatha Rao, J.1. The petitioners in these two writ petitions are dealers registered under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('the APGST Act', for short). They question the action of the first respondent in these two writ petitions in collecting certain amounts towards tax and penalty of five times tax. 2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 28057 of 1995 is a proprietary concern engaged in the business of gold and silver articles. In the affidavit of its proprietor given in support of the writ petition, it is stated that it is maintaining books of account in accordance with law and that it has been filing monthly returns and paying taxes regularly. He states that on November 15, 1995, the first respondent in the writ petition inspected the premises of the petitioner and that a stock inventory was carried on without properly making verification and that the first respondent 'allegedly drew an inference' that there was deficit/variation in stock of silver items worth Rs. 4,41,06...
B. Pandurangarao Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary to Go ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1997(4)ALT473
ORDERT.N.C. Rangarajan, J.1. This writ petition seeks regularisation of the services of the petitioner and for that purpose, a direction to the Department of Space to convey approval to the proposals made by the National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) for sanction of the additional man power strength.2. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner responded to the advertisement dated 8-3-1993 for a temporary post of Technical Assistant-A for a period of one year. He was selected and appointed on 19-6-1993 for this post, the vacancy for which has arisen because of the study leave by the regular incumbent. The petitioner was initially appointed for six months, which was extended by another six months and further, upto 28-2-1994. However, when the regular incumbent returned from leave, because of the need for his services, the petitioner was offered a fresh appointment on contract basis on a consolidated remuneration of Rs. 2,300/- per month for a period of one year. On the petitioner expre...
Gali Laxmamma Vs. Reparthi Anjaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(4)ALT129
ORDERB. Sri Atchutananda Swamy, J.1. The petitioner herein is the defendant in O.S.No.1495 of 1987 on the file of the District Munsif, Suryapet. The present revision petition was filed by her aggrieved by the orders passed by the District Munsif as well as the Subordinate Judge on an application filed by her in I.A.No.145 of 1993 seeking to set aside the ex parte judgment and decree given by the trial Court dated 9-02-1993.2. The facts that led into filing of this revision petition are: the District Munsif posted O.S.No. 1495/87 pending on his file for recording the evidence of the plaintiff on 23-1-1993. After the chief-examination is over he adjoured the case to 4-2-1993 for cross-examination of P.W.I. But the petitioner's counsel in the trial Court was not present and no representation was made on that day. In those circumstances the District Munsif passed the following order:'No cross-examination-No representation - Arguments heard'.On 9-2-1993 after giving notice the District Muns...
S. Venkateswara Rao, Freedom Fighter Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT740
ORDERB.S. Raikote, J.1. Though the matter is in the admission list, both the Counsel submitted that the same could be disposed of on merits.2. Heard. The case of the petitioner is that he is a freedom fighter and getting freedom fighters' pension from the Central Government. He further submitted that in terms of G.O. Ms.No. 241 dt. 12-9-94, he is entitled to free bus pass from APSRTC. But by Proceedings No. P9/294 (55)/95-OPD (p) dated 5-1-96, the respondent Corporation rejected his application on the ground that his date birth is 10-10-1929 and he had not completed 65 years of age as on 14-9-1994. The petitioner contends that this order of the Corporation is illegal and without jurisdiction and contrary to the G.Os. issued by the Government. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the Corporation submits that the application of the petitioner has been rejected in view of the Circular of the Corporation dated 30-9-94 vide Circular No. 52/94- OPD (P). Because, according to that Circu...
The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Chairman and Managing Direct ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT198
G. Bikshapathy, J.1. Both the Appeals can be disposed of under common Judgment at the admission stage.2. O.S.No. 1487 of 1987 was filed by the Plaintiffs (Respondents in A.S.No. 115/96) seeking judgment and decree against the 1st Defendant (The Appellant in A.S.No. 115/96) by directing Defendant No. 1 to vacate the suit schedule property and deliver the vacant peaceful possession to the Plaintiffs and to further direct the Defendant No. 1 to pay a sum of Rs. 30/000/- as damages for unlawful possession and occupation of the suit premises from 1-6-1986 to 18-6-1987 and future damages @ Rs. 1,000/- per day till the delivery of the posession is effected. The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada, who tried the Suit passed decree and judgment on 16-11-1995 directing the 1st Defendant to deliver the suit schedule property to the Plaintiffs within a period of two months from the date of passing of the judgment and also further directed to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month towards ...
Chella Rajasekhara Reddy and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Princi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT650
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. Both the Writ Petitions are clubbed and disposed of under common order.W.P.No. 16036/92:2. The Writ Petition is filed seeking declaration that the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing the Award in respect of 5000 feet pipeline in S.Nos. 297/2and 298/2 of Penubarthi village,RapurMandal, Nellore District as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential direction to pass an award, fixing the compensation in respect of the pipeline in respect of the estimation submitted by the 3rd respondent on 15-2-1992.3. The case of the petitioner is that the entire village of Penubarthi was acquired by the Government for foreshore submersion of Kandaleru Reservoir of Telugu Ganga Project. Notification was issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 22-10-1990 and the possession was also taken. As far as the petitioner is concerned an extent of Ac.4-82 cents were acquired under the notification. The Land Acquisition Officer passed award in respect of the compe...
Vijayawada Vanaspathi Merchants Assn., Rep. by Its Secretary Karamsett ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALD(Cri)103; 1996(2)ALT1003
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The first petitioner is an association and petitioner Nos. 2 to 20 are oil traders and members of the first petitioner and they are licenced dealers under the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Licensing and Distribution) Order, 1982 (for short 'the Order'). They deal in purchase and sale of ground-nut oil, refined oils, vanaspathi and gingelly oil which are all edible oils besides coconut oil. They are challenging in this writ petition a circular issued by the Commissioner of Civil Supplies on 4-5-1987 in Ref. No. P.5/69/87 by which all the Collectors in the Districts and the Chief Rationing Officer in the city of Hyderabad were asked to issue instructions to all the dealers in edible oils and edible oil seeds not to store any non-edible oils or seeds in the licenced business premises. In compliance with mat, the Deputy Grain Purchasing Officer, Vijayawada, issued another circular on 7-7-1987 in Rc.No. 45/87 informing the petitioners that they should not store a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »