Andhra Pradesh Court December 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dodla Chenchurami Reddy Vs. the State of A.P., Ministry of Major Irrig ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALT175
K.B. Siddappa, J.1. These Civil Revision Petitions are interconnected; they are disposed of by a common order.2. C.R.P. No. 3868 of 1992 was filed against the order passed in O.P. No. 39 of 1989. C.R.P. No. 3869 of 1992 is directed against the order in O.P. No. 40 of 1989 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nandyal.3. The Contractor is the Revision Petitioner. He entered into an agreement with the State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Superintending Engineer, under the Agreement No. 12 SE/84-85, dated 27-9-1984 for excavation of Srisailam Right Bank Canal from K.M.O. 107.04 to 1.00 K.M., and formation of bank on either side of the canal as excavated. The work was completed by the end of December, 1986. During the course of the work part payments were made. After completion of the Work, final bill was passed in the month of August, 1987.4. The case of the Revision Petitioner is that there are variations in the work requiring him investment of huge amounts. As and when th...
Jupudi Bhushanam Vs. Joint Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALT627
ORDERK.B. Siddappa, J.1. This Revision is filed against the order passed by the Joint Collector, Khammam in Case No. C4 (M)2/90. The Revision Petitioner filed a petition before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Sattupalli, for restoration of his possession in respect of the land in Survey Nos. 732, 733 to 738, 832 to 835, situated at Baithupalli Village of Khammam District Under Section 32(1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. The Mandal Revenue Officer considered the same on merits and held that the father of the petitioner and after him the petitioner himself are the protected tenants. They were to be in possession of the lands in question. Subsequently, it seems that the petitioner was displaced from the land and he filed a petition for restoration of possession. Such a remedy is not available to him. According to the Mandal Revenue Officer, once Section 38-E Certificate is issued, the protected tenant becomes the owner. Subsequently possession does...
Ravuru Babu Rao Vs. General Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALT805
N.Y. Hanumanthappa, J.1. The appellant preferred this writ appeal questioning the judgment and order dated 16-7-1991 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 9488 of 1987 refusing to grant writ of prohibition restraining the respondent from proceeding further in pursuance of the order dated 31-3-1987 of the Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Madras and to further direct the respondent to treat the period of suspension between 8-11-1979 and 8-3-1985 as regular and pay the salary for the said period and grant such other benefits as the appellant is entitled to. For the purpose of disposal of this writ appeal, the ranks of the parties have been mentioned as they were arrayed in the writ petition.2. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Inspector, Oriental Insurance Company on 5-8-1976. In the year 1979, he was promoted as Grade I Inspector with effect from 5-8-1978. On 10-5-1979, newspapers reported the progress of cyclonic storm and about the po...
Parvathamma and ors. Vs. Y. Tulsiram and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-1996
Reported in: 1996(4)ALT1195
ORDERK.B. Siddappa, J.1. This Revision is filed against the order passed in O.S.S.R.No.1903/94 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Vikarabad.2. The Suit was filed for partition in respect of B & C Schedule lands and also in respect of A schedule property which was acquired and compensation was also taken away by the defendants. The lower Court, in respect of B & C schedule properties held that they are in joint possession of the plaintiffs and defendants. But in respect of A schedule property, which was acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer and the compensation was also distributed among the defendants, the lower Court held that it is not in joint possession of the parties. The present suit is virtually for recovery of the share of the plaintiffs from out of the compensation amount granted in respect of A schedule property. To this effect there is an averment in the plaint also in para-5. Therefore, the lower Court directed the plaintiffs to pay Court fee on each 1/10th share of the p...
Sivaratri Venkataiah and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-10-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALD(Cri)354; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)155; 1997CriLJ1967
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment in NDPS Sessions Case No. 51/94 (CC No. 1/94) convicting the appellants under Section 8(c) r/w Section 20(b)(i) of the N.D.P.S. Act and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for a period of five years each besides imposing fine of Rs. 1000/- each, in default to suffer S.I. for six months. 2. The prosecution laid charge against A-1 to A-3 alleging that the accused Nos. 1 to 3 on the intervening night of 5/6th August, 1993 around 2-10 hours in the general bogi of 6060 Charminar Express, found in possession of Ganja without licence. While it was halting at Platform No. 1A in Vijayawada Railway Station, A-1 was found in possession of 10 Kgs. of Ganja in light blue coloured century sports bag and A-2 was found in possession of 12 1/2 Kgs of Ganja in one grey coloured Alfa suitcase having English letters NK and A-3 was found in possession of 7 1/2 Kgs. of Ganja in a head-load cloth packing, without having any valid licence, thereby the accuse...
M. Pratap Reddy and Sons, H.P.C. Dealer, Rep. by Its Partner, Mr. M. M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-10-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALT124
ORDERB.S. Raikote, J.1. This writ petition is filed being aggrieved by judgment and order of the Director of Civil Supplies, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad dated 8-2-1996 passed on its file No. DCS. Ref. No. E2/1015/95, confirming the order of the Joint Collector, Nizamabad in reference Memo. No. S/3/299/93, dated 31-8-1995. By both the orders the request of the petitioner for renewal of licence bearing No. 83/3909/90 is refused. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner Sri E. Manohar strenuously contended that the impugned order is illegal and without jurisdiction. He further submitted that the Court below is in error in observing that for renewal of licence the possession should be lawful and in fact the provisions of A.P. Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Order, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as Petroleum Products Order) do not insist any lawfulness of the possession of the person who has app...
R. Subba Rayudu Vs. Veenaishm Collector/Chairman, Distt. Cuddapah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)ALD357; 1997(1)ALT466; 1997(1)APLJ83; 1997CriLJ3165
ORDER1. The contempt case is filed alleging deliberate and intentional violation of the order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 19223/95, dated 20-10-1995. 2. The petitioner is a displaced person under Telugu Ganga Project having lost both the land and house. He also belongs to backward class. The Government issued G.O.Ms. No. 98, dated 15-4-1986 and subsequent instructions providing employment to displaced persons on preferential basis. As the petitioner was entitled for consideration and since the same was not extended to the petitioner, even though other similarly situate persons were appointed, he filed Writ Petition No. 4324/95. The said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the G.O. issued by the Government. However, the Selection Committee passed order on 14-9-1995 rejecting the case of the petitioner and confirming the appointment of the other two persons as Junior Assistants. Against the said order, the petiti...
Andhra Bank Officers Union and anr. Vs. Andhra Bank and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)ALT654
ORDERB. Sri Atchutananda Swamy, J.1. W.P.No. 15363 of 1996 has been filed by the Andhra Bank Officers' Union, hereinafter called 'the Union', represented by its General Secretary for quashing the proceedings of the General Manager, Andhra Bank in his letter No. 666/3/A1/T447, dated 26-12-1987 wherein the date of birth of the 2nd respondent (i.e.) G. Malakonda Reddy, working as General Manger Merchant Banking Division, Andhra Dank, Bombay, was changed from 1-7-1936 to 7-12-1937 on the basis of a decree passed by the Principal District Munsif, Visakhapatnam in O.S.No. 170/87, dated 31-8-1987 by contending that the said decree of the Court was obtained by playing fraud on the bank and sought for a declaration that the same is nullity in the eye of law by issuance of a writ of certiorari. A consequential direction to the bank is also sought to retire the 2nd respondent from service as per the date of birth entered in the service records of the 2nd respondent at the time of his joining the ...
Shiva Enclave Welfare Society, Rep. by Member, P. Mohan Raj and ors. V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)ALT761
ORDERS.V. Maruthi, J.1. These writ petitions are disposed of by a common judgment as the issue involved is common to all the writ petitions.2. The petitioners in W.P. No. 16957/96 are bona fide purchasers of plots made in Acs. 9.00 of land situated in Survey No. 91 of Bowenpally Village, Rangareddy District known as 'Vadlavani Bhavi'. The said Vadlavani Bhavi was plotted out in the year 1970 after obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayat. The purchases were made between 27-11-1993 to 23-5-1996. The first petitioner is the Society known as 'Shiva Enclave Welfare Society'. The second petitioner is one of the members of the Society. The Vendors of the petitioners are the Legal Representatives of Sri Mustafa Shareif, Sri Veera Reddy and Malla Reddy respondents 6 to 11. At the time of purchase of these plots there were temporary structures in various plots. After purchasing the plots, 35 of them have constructed their houses. They have obtained electricty connection, telephone connectio...
A. Raja Gopal and ors. Vs. the Regional Manager, Apsrtc, Ananthapur Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(1)ALT747
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. As the questions involved in all these Writ Petitions are identical, the Writ Petitions are disposed of by a common order.2. The petitioners were allotted the Stalls in the A.P.S.R.T.C. Ananthapur Bus Stand in pursuance of the Tenders submitted by them in the year 1987. They have been paying the prescribed fee to the Corporation from time to time. Initially, the period of contract was 3 years. While so, the Corporation issued Circular No. 5/90-OPD(C), dated 12-1-1990 wherein it was decided to increase the period of licence by 12 years on payment of enhanced rents from the 4th year onwards. In pursuance of the said Circular, the licence held by the petitioners is extended from time to time on appropriate rent in accordance with the Circulars.3. It is the case of the petitioners that they have completed only 9 years of licence period and that was expiring by the end of November, 1996. However, the renewal has not been made by the Corporation as per the Circular ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »