Andhra Pradesh Court September 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Agricultural Market Committee, Rep. by Its Secretary Vs. M.R.K. Chowda ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT478
P. Venkatarama Raddi, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the order of the learned single Judge in Appeal No. 405/85 dismissing the appeal. That appeal was preferred by the Agricultural Market Committee, Bhadrachalam which is the appellant herein questioning the enhancement of the market value of the respondent's land from Rs. 5/- to Rs. 25/- per sq. yard. The extent of land acquired from the respondent- claimant is one acre and the same is located in Survey No. 20/267 of Bhadrachalam village. It is part of the larger area of 11 1/2 acres acquired by the same notification. 2. The notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 6-1-1977. The Sub-Collector, Bhadrachalam (land Acquisition Officer) passed an award on 8-10-1979 fixing the market value of the land acquired at Rs. 5/- per sq. yard i.e., at Rs. 24,200/- per acre. Solatium at 15% and interest from the date of taking possessi on till the date of award at 4% per annum was also provid...
P. Raju Vs. the Managing Director, the Chittoor Co-operative Sugars Lt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT827
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J. 1. Aggrieved by the award dated 18-2-1992 in O.P. No. 162 of 1990 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Chittoor, the claimant has filed this appeal. 2. It is most unfortunate that a brilliant student and athlete by name Mr. P. Raju, the appellant herein had to lose his left leg not because of his fault, but because of the fault of the driver of the vehicle bearing registration No. ADC 3282 belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent.3. The facts, in brief, are that the claimant was a student of Intermediate in M.P.C. group studying in Chittoor. While he was returning home on a cycle from Indoor Stadium at Chittoor, on 27-1-1990 at about 4-15 p.m., the bus bearing No. ADC 3282, involved in the accident, came in a rash and negligent manner in the opposite direction and on wrong side and hit the claimant near the place opposite to the Collector's Bunglow, Chittoor on Chittoor-Tiruttani ...
Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Home Affairs, Rep. by the Secretary ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT436
Lingaraja Rath, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of the same judgment respectively preferred by the respondent and the appellants in W.P. No. 6987 of 1989 and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience the appellants in W.A. No. 44 of 1993 are referred in the judgment as the appellants and the respondent in that appeal as the respondent. So far as W.A. No. 158 of 1993 is concerned the parties thereto are to be respectively referred when the consideration of that appeal is taken up.2. The order of compulsory retirement of the respondent passed under Rule 56(j)of the Fundamental Rules having been set aside by the learned single Judge this appeal has been preferred. The respondent, an Ex-Army personnel born on 5-4-1939 was appointed as Inspector of CISF (Central Industrial Security Force) on 21-2-1972 in which post he was confirmed on 25-11-1974. He was promoted as Assistant Commandant on 15-2-1975 and was regularised in the post on 1-1-1981. The order of ...
Sandhya Rani Yamparala Vs. Board of Intermediate Education and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: AIR1996AP204
ORDER1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a declaration that the action of the 1st respondent in directing the 2nd respondent to cancel the petitioner's admission into the Intermediate course as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue two year Intermediate Course.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner strenuously contended that the petitioner is entitled to the relief as prayed for in view of the fact that the petitioner has been declared as having passed in X standard of All India Central Board of Secondary School Examination. The petitioner has produced the mark-sheet of that examination, dated 31-5-1994. From the said mark list, it is clear that the petitioner has been declared to have passed the said examination. On the basis of this mark list also and on the basis of the certificate issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education, the petitioner ...
Sunkara Suri Babu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALD40; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)366; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)165; 1998CriLJ1480; II(1996)DMC590
1. This appeal is directed against the conviction of A1, A3 and A4 for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years and convicting A1 for the offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and both the sentences to run concurrently. 2. The deceased was the wife of A1 having been married on 9-3-1984. A2 is her father-in-law, A3 the mother-in-law and A4 the sister-in-law of the deceased. A2 died during the trial and the case against him was abated. A5 was her another sister-in-law who was only aged 14 years and the learned Sessions Judge has therefore quashed committal in respect of A5 and directed that she be tried by the Juvenile Court. The case of prosecution is that the deceased had committed suicide on 25-4-1989 by burning herself and since this happened within seven years of her marriage a...
The Managing Director, State Bank of Travancore Vs. K.S. Prasad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT631; (1996)IILLJ1119AP
Lingaraja Rath, J.1. Assailing the directions in the judgment of the learned single Judge in W.P.No. 4231 of 1984 dated August 26, 1988 directing the appellant to pay the respondent his full salary including the increments covering the period of suspension, to consider him for promotion as indicated in the judgment with consequential reliefs, and for rectification of any mistakes in the grant of increments, this appeal has been preferred.2. The respondent who was in the service of the appellant as Officer, Grade-I was suspended on June 14, 1980 and in a departmental proceeding conducted against him on charges of misconduct like exercise of powers in excess of authority, accumulation of loans to be recovered, non-reporting of the factual position to the head office, and backing out of guarantees by outsiders, the punishment of stoppage of three increments was imposed upon him while directing his reinstatement. The period of suspension was also directed to be treated as such as per the p...
P.V. Satyanarayana Raju Vs. Kanumuri Janakirama Raju and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT225
Krishna Saran Shrivastav, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 598/79 on the file of the I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant in this appeal. 2. The facts giving rise to this appeal in brief, are as follows: On 25.11.1964 the respondents jointly purchased the land measuring 4575 square yards of plot No. 5 equivalent to plot No. E in S.No. 318/1 situated in Gaddeannaram village of Hyderabad vide sale deed Ex.B-1 with plan Ex.B-2 attached to it. On 03-05-1975 they sold 445 square yards of land', out of 4575 square yards for a consideration of Rs. 4,000/- to Sri P. Ranga Raju vide sale deed Ex.A-3. All the respondents had 1/4th share each, in the aforesaid land purchased by them on 25-11-1964. They divided the said land into 5 plots and out of it, one was sold to P. Rangaraju. On 10-06-1975 the 1st respondent sold 484 square yards of land out of the remaining 4130 square yards at the rate of Rs. 24/- per square yard and received Rs. 1,000/- as advance vide receipt Ex....
Bakka Venkamma Vs. Deepa Narisi Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT317
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. A short but an important question of general importance which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a petition filed by an injured person before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for short 'M. A.C.T.' on 24-11-1990 for compensation in respect of an accident which took place on 16-3-1989 is hit by limitation or it is saved by the subsequent change in law brought about by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act 54 of 1994 which was brought into force with effect from 14-11-1994. This precise question arises for consideration and resolution in the back drop of the following facts:It is the case of the appellant Bakka Venkamma that she sustained certain physical injuries on account of an accident occurred on 16-3-1989 involving a motor vehicle owned by the second respondent, driven by the first respondent and insured by the third respondent Insurance Company. The appellant filed original petition for compensation on 24-11-1990. This O.P. purported to have be...
Savoy Solvent Oil Extraction Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director, B. P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT1005
ORDERNeelam Sanjiva Reddy, J1. These two appeals arise from the judgment and decree dated 30th April, 1988 passed in O.S.No. 27 of 1981 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Nizamabad.2. The facts necessary for disposal of these appeals are that the plaintiff-Indian Overseas Bank represented by its agent and General Power of Attorney-holder and Branch Manager, Nizamabad, filed the suit against the first defendant M/s Savoy Solvent Oil Extraction Limited represented by its Managing Director, the second defendant B. Pramodkumar Reddy, the third defendant B. Ganga Reddy and the fourth defendant, M/s Sherif and Sons, Kakinada. The first defendant is a company with its registered office and factory at Nizamabad, carrying on business of manufacture and sale of bran-oil, deoiled bran cakes etc. Defendants 2 and 3 are Managing Director and Chairman, respectively of the first defendant company. The fourth defendant is a firm with its head office at Madras and branch office at Kakinada, with transit...
K.P. Narayana Reddy Alias Police Narayana Reddy Vs. Alla Nagi Reddy an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-1995
Reported in: AIR1996AP198; 1995(3)ALT750
ORDER1. This is an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order in I.A. No. 597 of 1984 in O.P. No. 35 of 1984, on the file of the District Judge, Kurnool. Under that I.A., the petitioner sought revocation of the succession certificate granted to the present respondent No.1 vide order dated 3-7-1984 of the District Judge, Kurnool in O.P. No. 35 of 1984. By the impugned judgment and order dated 22nd December, 1988 passed by the District Judge in I.A. No. 597 of 1984 in O.P. No. 35 of 1984, the learned District Judge, Kurnool dismissed that application. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner in I.A. No. 597 of 1984 has come to this Court by way of an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The learned counsel for the appellant strenuously contended that the Court below was in error in not revoking the Succession Certificate granted in favour of respondent No. 1 having regard to the materials onrecord. He also submitted...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »