Andhra Pradesh Court August 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bodanapu Khasim Vs. Bodanapu Khaderaiah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT736
Krishna Saran Shrivastav, J. 1. This is unsuccessful plaintiff's first appeal in forma pauperis against the judgment and decree of dismissal of his suit for declaration of his 1/4th share, partition and separate possession of the plaint 'A' and 'B' schedule properties. 2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, in brief, are that the plaintiff-appellant is the son of the 1st defendant through his first wife Siddamma. The remaining defendants are the sons of 1st defendant through the second wife Peeramma. The appellant-plaintiff; on the allegation that they belong to Dudekula community who are regarded as Hindus and according to long established custom they are following Hindu customs, practices and conventions, they observe Hindu festivals and rituals; they wear jewels and dress in Hindu fashion; they wear caste marks as Hindus; they form a joint Hindu family, which family owns plaint 'A' and 'B' schedule properties; instituted the suit demanding his 1/4th separate share in the plaint 'A...
M.S. Shyam Vs. the A.P. State Financial Corporation Rep. by Managing D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT55
ORDERT.N.C. Ranga Rajan, J.1. This Writ Petition challenges the sale of the unit by the A.P. State Financial Corporation.According to the petitioner, the industrial unit of M/s. Vajra Chemicals (Private) Limited which has been seized by the A.P. State Financial Corporation was advertised for sale and tenders were called for with an earnest money deposit of Rs. 50,000/-. The auction was to be held on 17-8-1994 and the petitioner gave his tender on the forenoon of that date offering Rs. 16 Lakhs. There were four other bids and at the negotiation thereafter the petitioner offered a highest bid of Rs. 23.5 lakhs. Subsequently, a fresh advertisement was made putting the unit for sale with a lower earnest money deposit of Rs. 30,000/-. The petitioner again made a bid for Rs. 23 lakhs and in the negotiations thereafter the fourth respondent was the highest bidder for Rs. 26 lakhs. According to the petitioner all the earnest money deposits were returned with the information that a fresh sale w...
M. Rama Krishna Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. Nammasivayya Prabhakar Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT975
Krishna Saran Shrivastav, J.1. Having lost in both the courts below, the defendants have preferred this Second Appeal which has been admitted on the following substantial question of law:'1. Whether the lower Court erred in declaring plaintiff's title to the suit vacant site without considering any evidence as to the nature of possession and the mode of enjoyment of the vacant site and without recording a finding regarding plaintiff's possessory title which was the basis of the plaintiff's claim of ownership?2. Having observed that the document Ex. A-4 gift was not inter parties and hence the boundary recitals therin were inadmissible in law, whether the lower appellate Court erred in relying on the same in proof of plaintiff's title on the sole ground that the document was marked without objection by the defendants and the document so admitted meant admission of the contents of the document also by the defendants?'2. The facts are jejune: - Plaintiff - respondent has purchased through...
United Commercial Bank, Rep. by their Manager and Duly Constituted Att ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT411
Krishna Saran Shrivastav, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 74 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Bapatla is the appellant in this appeal.2. The facts of the case lie in a very small compass. The plaintiff-Bank on 1-10-1975 advanced to the defendant No. 1 a sum of Rs. 23,000/-on interest at the rate of 4% above the Reserve Bank of India rate subject to a minimum of 13% with half yearly rests. The defendants No. 2 and 3 stood as guarantors. The loan was granted for agricultural purposes to defendant No. 1 who is an agriculturist. He did not pay the loan amount and interest amounting to Rs. 32,615-70 paise, therefore, the plaintiff sued the defendants. The defendants resisted the suit mainly on the ground that the plaintiff-Bank is not entitled to claim interest at the rate of 13% per annum with half yearly rests. They are agriculturists within the meaning of the Andhra Pradesh Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 (Act IV of 1938) and, therefore, the suit debt is liable to be scaled...
Nunna Venkateswarlu Alias Venkateswara Rao Vs. the State of Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ108
1. Accused No. 1 in Sessions Case No. 180 of 1990 which was pending on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kothagudem is the appellant herein. He along with A-2 and A-3 were prosecuted in the said Court and were tried for an offence punishable under Section 304-B, I.P.C. On evidence, the learned Sessions Judge found that no offence was disclosed against A-2 and A-3 and therefore they were acquitted. A-1 was found guilty of the said charge and therefore he was convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for seven years and hence he preferred the present appeal. 2. A-1 happened to be the son of A-2 and A-3. A-2 is the father and A-3 is the mother of A-1. The accused appellant herein got married with the deceased Nunna Leelavathi in the year 1985. She died unnatural death on 12-6-1990 at Kothuru village as she was subjected to cruelty and harassment with demands to bring more dowry from her parents and to sell the land which was gifted to her by her father at the time of the marriage and...
Thulasi Alias Thulja Bai Vs. Laxman Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)ALT(Cri)708; 1996(1)APLJ70; 1996CriLJ1160
ORDER1. This Revision is preferred assailing the order of Court of Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar in reversing the order of the Court of Magistrate. Proceedings arose under section 125, Cr.P.C. for maintenance instituted by the wife who is the petitioner herein. Ist respondent is her husband. The petitioner had instituted M.C. No. 34 of 1989 on the file of JFCM, Mahaboobnagar claiming maintenance a Rs. 500/- per month. The same was contested by the Ist respondent on the ground that he did not neglect to maintain her and that the quantum claimed by her was exorbitant, and that he was not having that much income to pay Rs. 500/- per month towards maintenance. Enquiry was held and the Court of Magistrate repelled the said contentions and directed the payment of maintenance from the date of application. 2. The 1st respondent had preferred revision to the Court of Session, Mahhboobnagar. The said Court while upholding the order of maintenance reversed the effective date holding that the maint...
Govinda Reddy Vs. Varalakshmamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT(Cri)80; I(1997)DMC79
B. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This revision is filed by the husband-petitioner aggrieved by the remand order passed by the Court of Sessions, Anantapur in the proceedings Under Section 125, of Cr.P.C.2. The wife-respondent No. 1 had instituted M.C. No. 4 of 1989 on the file of the Munsiff Magistrate, Kalyandurg claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month. The petitioner had resisted the same on the ground that the 1st respondent was living apart without just cause. There is no other allegation excepting this. The case set-up by the 1st respondent was accepted by the Court of Magistra ordering maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month. Aggrieved by me quantum, the wife filed a revision and the petitioner had also filed a revision aggrieved by the order mulcting him with the liability of maintenance on the ground that when he was ready to maintain her, it was her fault in staying apart. Both the revisions were heard together by the Court of Sessions, Anantapur and remanded th...
N. Ramu and ors. Vs. Transport Commissioner, Government of A.P. and or ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)ALT860
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. In both the writ petitions the petitioners who are operators of the contract carriages have called in question the validity and the legality of the directions issued by the Transport Commissioner contained in his D.O. Letter No. 28648 / Ml/95, dated 3-8-1995. Therefore, these two writ petitions were heard together of at the stage of admission itself. Sri E. Manohar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader were heard in the matter.2. The petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondents-Motor Vehicle Authorities not to launch prosecution against the petitioners and /or their crew under Section 192-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') in pursuance of the directions contained in the D.O. letter of the Transport Commissioner dated 3-8-1995, referred to above. They have also sought consequential direction to the Motor Vehicle Inspectors concerned not to launch prosecution against...
Mrs. Padmakiran Rao Vs. Mr. B. Venkateramana Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT154
P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is directed against the judgment in O.P. No. 311 of 1993 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, R.R. District, whereby he dismissed the petition filed jointly by the appellant and respondent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, for granting divorce. The respondent has been residing in United States since the year 1987 and it seems he is employed there. The marriage took place on 19-8-1992. Unfortunately, just within a few days after the marriage, there was disruption in marital life and estrangement between the parties. It is averred in the petition that the marriage was not consummated and the respondent left for United States on 24-8-92. One year thereafter, a joint petition was filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce on the basis of mutual consent. The petition was verified at Hyderabad on 20th August 1993 by both parties and it was presented on the same da...
K. Sitarama Raju Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1995
Reported in: [1996]87CompCas22(AP)
S.V. Maruthi, J. 1. The question involved in this writ petition is, whether the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction constituted under section 4 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), has the power to restrain the company from effecting any change in the composition of the board of directors including top managerial personnel pending decision on the question of rehabilitation of the company? The facts, in brief, are as follows : 2. The petitioner is one of the promoters of the second respondent-company, namely, Delta Paper Mills Limited. The company was incorporated in the year 1975 as a public limited company under the Companies Act. Mr. Bh. Vijayakumar Raju, was the managing director from 1975 till May 10, 1985, and Mr. P.V. Narasimha Raju, was the managing director of the second respondent-company between May, 1985, and September, 1991. Mr. Bh. Vijayakumar Raju, became the managing director from September ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »