Andhra Pradesh Court August 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bio-chemical and Synthetic Products Ltd. Vs. Somiah and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1995
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT777
P.N. Mishra, C.J.1. Though a short, but of far-reaching consequence question, has arisen in the instant appeal which has come before us at the instance of the management against the order of a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 16832 of 1994, to the effect that the petitioner seeking amendment of the counter in a proceeding on reference of an Industrial dispute under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to raise additional plea that the management cannot repose confidence in the workman in view of his subversive and negligent activities cannot be permitted as, 'no charge memo was served on the first respondent (employer) (sic. employee) that the petitioner (employee) (sic. employer) had lost confidence; that the first respondent was not made known that his conduct amounts to subversive activities and negligent of duties; and that there was also no enquiry and as such, he had no opportunity to meet said charges in the domestic enquiry, the petition is also a b...
Girrajmal Beedi Wale Vs. Andhra Pradesh Beedi Workers Union and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT728
C.V.N. Sastry, J. 1. This is a matter arising under the Industrial Disputes Act. The employer has filed this appeal questioning the order of the learned Single Judge confirming the award of the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court has ordered reinstatement of the five workmen whose services have been terminated by the employer and payment of 50% of backwages to them. The five workmen in question seem to have put in service ranging from 8 to 18 years. On a charge that they participated in an illegal strike their services were terminated in the year 1981. On a reference of the dispute to the Labour Court for adjudication, the Labour Court, while holding that the misconduct alleged against the workmen is proved, however, found that the punishment of termination of services is shockingly disproportionate and unjust. The Labour Court accordingly directed reinstatement with 50% of backwages. The learned Single Judge found no reason to interfere with the award of the Labour Court and dismiss...
T.N. Seshan, Chief Election Commissioner and ors. Vs. Dr. M. Karunanid ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT108
ORDERKrishna Saran Shrivastav, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Application No. 202 of 1995 in C.S.No.2 of 1995. Application No. 203 of 1995 in C.S.No.3 of 1995 and Application No. 204 of 1995 in C.S.No.4 of 1995 for revoking the leave granted to sue the defendants as also the Application No. 48 of 1995 in unregistered suit C.S. (SR) No. 5319 of 1995 for grant of leave to sue the defendants because of commonality of questions of law and similarity of facts.2. It is a matter of record that Dr. M. Karunanidhi for himself and as the President of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Party (for short 'DMK Party') filed suit GS.No.4519 of 1994 against Sri T.N. Seshan, Sri K. Govindan Kutty and Konark Publishers in the High Court of Judicature at Madras, having ordinary original jurisdiction, for permanent injunction restraining them from publishing, releasing, circulating, selling, marketing and distributing the book titled as 'Seshan- an Intimate Story', after obtaining leave of the C...
Mohd. NazeeruddIn Vs. the Dist. Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT256
ORDERC.V.N. Sastri, J. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader. 2. This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the Mandal Revenue Officer, the second respondent herein, in putting a seal and preventing the petitioner from operating his hot mix plant in Survey No. 56 (Part) of Sultanpur village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District on 17-6-1995 without notice to him and without passing any written orders. The petitioner has earlier filed W.P.No. 12346 of 1995 in this Court for the same relief. The said writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage on 21-6-1995 directing the petitioner to approach the Principal District Munsif, East & North, Saroornagar Ranga Reddy District, before whom O.S.No. 110 of 1995 filed by the third respondent herein regarding the same subject matter is pending. Pursuant to the said direction, the petitioner filed I.A.No. 1895 of 1995 in O.S.No. 110 of 1995 before the Principal District Munsif...
M/S. L.S. and Co. Rep. by Managing Partner Vs. State of A.P. and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1995
Reported in: AIR1996AP157; 1996(1)ALT28
ORDER1. The petitioner prays for an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one In the nature of a writ of certiorari by calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to Proceedings No. 9(1)/6(1)/ 6331/76 dated 16-11-1981 and quash the said proceedings and for consequential directions-.2. The facts necessary leading to the filing of this writ petition may be briefly summarised: One A. Venkateswara Rao on his behalf and on behalf of his son A. Koteswara Rao, filed a statement in Form-I under Section 6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short 'the Act'). The complete details of the lands held by Sri V. Venatas-wara Rao and his son A. Koteswara Rao were furnished in the said statement. The total extent of the land involved in the said statement is 6272 sq. mtrs., and according to the petitioner the entire land is occupied by the buildings which have been constructed much before the commencement of the Act i.e. 17-2-1976. The petitioner claims...
Ganji Krishna Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1995
Reported in: (1996)136CTR(AP)98; [1996]220ITR654(AP)
G. Bikshapathy, J. 1. At the instance of the assessee, the following question of law has been referred by the Tribunal, Bench-A, Hyderabad, under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the higher rates of income-tax specified by sub-paragraph II of paragraph I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act are applicable to an HUF where none of the members has any independent taxable income ?' 2. The reference arises out of the order of the Tribunal in ITA No. 821/(Hyd) of 1984, dt. 22nd July, 1985, in respect of the asst. yr. 1981-82. 3. The assessee is an HUF consisting of the Karta, Sri Krishna Rao, his wife and minor daughter. The Karta has two other children who are also minors. There was a partial partition between the Karta and the two minor sons. The minor sons are partners in a firm, Ganji Venkanna & Sons, in which the wife of the Karta is also a partner. In the assessment of the Kar...
Vijayalakshmi Oil Company Vs. Joint Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1995
Reported in: 1999(6)ALT712
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. The petitioner-firm owns an oil mill producing edible oils and it holds a retail and wholesale licence under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Dealers (Licensing & Distribution) Order, 1982 for purchase, sale and storage of edible oils and oil-seeds. The business premises was inspected and searched by the 2nd respondent on 9-5-1995 and a panchanama was prepared wherein contravention of Clause 11 (iii) of the said Control Order and Clause 4 of the Pulses, Edible Oilseeds and Edible Oils (Storage Control) Order, 1977 were alleged stating that the storage limits were exceeded. Contravention of conditions of licence under the first mentioned Control Order was also alleged. Inter alia, it is mentioned in the, panchanama that there were stock variations leading to the inference of incorrect maintenance of accounts, non-furnishing of returns in Form-C to the District Supply Officer and non-mentioning of the addresses of the purchasers i...
B. Premanand Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALD316; 1996CriLJ466
P.S. Mishra, C.J.1. This appeal against the order in the original proceeding before this Court in W.P. No. 14454 of 1993 is being disposed of at the stage of admission, but not before we have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh and before getting from the State Government information as to the latest position of the investigation and materials collected by the police and after satisfying ourselves that a positive order can be made by us for filing of the report by the Investigating Officer in the capacity of the officer-in-charge of Puttaparthi Police Station under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 2. The facts of the case are : The petitioner-appellant herein, it appears, has the satisfaction of the honorific of being the Convenor of the Indian Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal which is, as he has claimed, a co-operating member of CSICDP (Only abbreviation is...
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Bharat Dynamics Limited.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: [1997]106STC158(AP)
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. This batch of revision cases arises out of a common question of law relating to the issue, as to whether the transaction constitute a contract of work or a contract of sale. Seven separate revision cases have been filed by the department against the common order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, in appeals arising under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and A.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1957 in respect of the assessment years 1971-72 to 1977-78. As common question of law is involved in all these revision cases, they are being dealt with under common order. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The appellant - M/s. Bharat Dynamics Limited, Hyderabad, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act. It is a Government of India undertaking under the Ministry of Defence. According to the memorandum of association, the main objects of the company, among other things, relate...
Silar Bee Vs. Maize Beedar Agriculture Research Station, Amberpet and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT96
ORDER1. This is a pathetic case of the petitioner who has been with the respondents in the capacity as Casual Labourer from 1980s. The petitioner approached this Court in the year 1988 by way of Writ Petition No. 17738 of 1988 seeking direction to regularise her services. This Court disposed of the said writ petition in the year 1991 directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for absorption in the equivalent post in the Agriculture University. 2. Inspite of the direction to the respondents in the said writ petition, they have not shown any interest in the matter. The explanation now submitted by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the University is that there are no permanent vacancies and the University is making hectic efforts by negotiating with the Government for getting sanction of posts and the services of the petitioner and some other employees who are similarly situate as that of the petitioner will be regularised soon after the additional posts ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »