Andhra Pradesh Court April 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Savani Carrying Corporation Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-1995
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. This appeal is filed by Savani Carrying Corporation i.e. Transport Organisation against the order of the District Forum, Kakinada sitting at Rajahmundry on CD. 298/92, whereby the District Forum directed the appellant i.e. opposite party in the CD. to pay a sum of Rs. 28,490/- with interest at 18% from 4.8.89 and Rs. 500/- towards costs. 2. It is not in dispute that A.P. Paper Mills Ltd., i.e. the second complainant in the CD. and second respondent in this appeal sent 414 bundles of papers from Rajahmundry to M/s. K.K. Traders Pvt. Ltd., Sivakasi through the branch office of Savani Transport Corporation at Rajahmundry. The consignment, during transit was damaged on 3.5.89 due to accident resulting in the paper bundles falling down on the road. The remaining bundles were handed over to the consignee at Sivakasi on 9.5.89. Thereafter a claim was made against the transport company for damages of Rs. 11 lakhs and also police complaint was made. Since the...
M/S. LeafIn India Ltd. Vs. B. Venkateswara Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-1995
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. Questioning the order of the District Forum, Adilabad in C.D. 108/94 whereby it directed the opposite party i.e. Leafin India Ltd. to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 12,000/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from 23.11.93 till the date of realisation and Rs. 3,500/- towards repairs and costs of Rs. 200/- the opposite party i.e. Leafin India Ltd, preferred this appeal. 2. Briefly stated, the case of the complainant was that the opposite party offered for sale a Bajaj Kawasaki Motorcycle bearing No. A.P-1/ A 1872. The said vehicle was seized by the opposite party from one of its debtors. The complainant contacted the opposite party No. 2 and agreed to purchase the motorcycle, for Rs. 12,000/- in as is where is condition as the vehicle was not road worthy and paid the said amount on 23.11.93 through Demand Draft for which the opposite party issued a receipt on 26.11.93. But the opposite parties did not hand over the relevant documents of the vehicle such as...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›