Andhra Pradesh Court March 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Manikyamba and Another Vs. Dr. R. Satyanarayana
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1995
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. This complaint is filed against Anuradha Agencies, to direct restoration of outer walls to "9" thickness and carpet area to 830 sq. ft. and to hand over possession of the flat. 2. Complainant No. 1 is the wife of 2nd Complainant. Pursuant to oral agreement dated 1.7.88, the complainants entered into with the Opposite Party M/s. Anuradha Agencies three agreements on 2.9.88. They are agreement of sale to purchase undivided share in the land by paying a sum of Rs. 14,940/- (Ex. A-2), agreement for construction of flat (Ex. A-3) and agreement for service charges (Ex. A-4). The total sum payable by them for the flat was Rs. 1,74,300/- and they paid the same in instalments, and the last instalment was paid on 23.8.89. 3. It is the case of the Complainants that the Opposite Party collected a sum of Rs. 8300/- towards loan service charges although the Complainants did not avail any loan from the Opposite Party. Further the Opposite Party collected in cash a ...
Svl Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1995
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The complaint is filed claiming a sum of Rs. 4,20,000/- under insurance policy with costs. 2. The complainant is a private company owning 8 fish tanks in Chinamille village, Tadepalligudem. West Godavari District. It insured with the opposite party under separate policies 10 for bunds of fish ponds in a sum of Rs. 12 lakhs and another for fish grown in the ponds in a sum of Rs.4,20,000/-on 12.8.1988 covering the period from 12.8.1988 to 11.8.1989 with bank clause. Due to heavy cyclone and floods that occurred in August, 1989 the fish tank bunds were damaged and all the fish in the tanks were washed away. The claim of the complainant towards bunds was settled. We are therefore not concerned with the same in this complaint. So far as the claim of the complainant for the loss of fish in the 7 tanks is concerned, the complainant immediately after the cyclone informed the opposite party about the loss of fish and requested for payment of compensation. In ...
Dr. M. Gandhi and Another Vs. the United India Insurance Company Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1995
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The first complainant is a Doctor by profession and second complainant is his wife. They constructed a Nursing Home at Uyyuru with 20 beds and operation theatre. They insured the building for a sum of Rs. 3,10,000/- and furniture and fittings for Rs. 30,000/-, in all a sum of Rs. 3,60,000/- with the United India Insurance Company i.e., the opposite party under an Insurance Policy covering the risk of cyclone between 8.12.1989 to 7.12.1990. While so due to un-precedented severe cyclone that occurred on 9.5.1990 the building and the equipment and furniture insured was badly effected. The complainant got the loss estimated immediately by a qualified Engineer and Architect and licenced Surveyor V. Srinivasa Rao. The Insurance Company appointed S. Raghunathan, Surveyor of Madras in May, 1990 itself to inspect the building and assess the loss. But the said Raghunathan did not visit the premises of the complainant and when the complainant and V. Srinivasa R...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›