Andhra Pradesh Court October 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satyayug Party and Another Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: AIR1996AP218
ORDER1. 'Satyayug Party', a political party duly registered with the Election Commission of India, through its President, and its General Secretary have filed this Writ Petition questioning an order dated 3-8-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, the second respondent herein, imposing certain restrictions on the campaigning activities of the party as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution, With a view to propagate its ideals and principles, Satyayug party wanted to organise a campaign in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad in the month of August, 1995 and for thatpurpose the first petitioner made an application to the second respondent on 1-8-1995 requesting for permission to take out a campaign from 3-8-1995 to 30-8-1995 with the following 7 items;(1) A group consisting of 5 (five) persons.(2) Carrying Placards and Party Flags.(3) Using one Megaphone with Batteries.(4) Speaking and walking in the streets (novehic...
Vidya Vs. Anil Kumar Lakotia
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: I(1997)DMC68
Motilal B. Naik, J.1. This appeal is filed against the dismissal of O.P. No. 1186 of 1990 by the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (Temp) filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act for custody of minor children, viz., Master Bharat Kumar and Baby Arti from the respondent-husband.2. Appellant herein is the wife and the respondent is the husband. It is the case of the appellant that their marriage took place in the year 1985 at Maheshwari Bhavan, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad as per Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage the respondent was not satisfied with the articles and gifts presented by the parents of the appellant and there was a demand from the respondent-husband and his family members for getting more dowry. In the month of October, 1990 the parents of the appellant were at Rajasthan and on the intervening night of 4th and 5th October, 1990 the appellant was beaten mercilessly and was driven out of the house with a pre-planned scheme to drive her from ...
B. Mary Jalaja Vs. S. Vasantha Vani and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT686
M.N. Rao, J. 1. At issue in this appeal is the seniority of the appellant Smt. B. Mary Jalaja and the first respondent Smt. Vasantha Vani in the post of Lecturer in Political Sciences in the Smt. Kandukuri Rajyalakshmi College for Women, Rajahmundry. The post of Lecturer in Political Science is the college is an aided one. Pursuant to a selection made by the competent authority, the appellant herein, Mrs. Mary Jalaja, and the first respondent Smt. Vasantha Vani were selected and the committe on a comparative assessment of their merit assigned rank No. 1 to the appellant and rank No. 2 to the first respondent. The last date for reporting for duty was 20-12-84. The first respondent joined service on 11-12-84 while the appellant joined service on 17-12-84. In September, 1992 one of the two posts became surplus because of change in the norms concerning working hours. Several other posts in other institutions also were found to be surplus because of the aforesaid change and therefore the Di...
Falcon Laboratories Rep. by Its Managing Partner, Chadalavada Ramesh B ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT432
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The petitioner seeks declaration that there is no validity constituted licensing authority in A.P. from 1-2-1989 to 20-2-1990 and for further declaration that all the sanctions for prosecution accorded during the said period are illegal and void.2. The petitioner is a manufacturer and distributor of drugs holding valid licence under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Among other drugs the petitioner has been manufacturing 'FENOPRIN' S.S. tablets during February, 1989 to September, 1989. The drug authorities have seized certain samples of the tablets and found that they are not upto the prescribed standard. One Sri G.S.R.C.V. Prasad Rao, in-charge Director during the relevant period accorded sanction for prosecution of the petitioner. The said Mr. Prasad functioned in such capacity from 1-2-1989 to 20-2-1990. He cancelled the licence issued to the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner filed W.P. No. 14777/89 and the same was allow...
South Eastern Carriers Private Limited Vs. Mohd. Sarvar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT658
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. Appellant is the plaintiff. The appellant/ plaintiff filed O.S. 1337/1980 on the file of the Court of the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for recovery of Rs. 17,310/- with interest at 18% per annum from the defendants 1 to 3.2. The learned trial Judge by his judgment and decree dt.3-11-1983 decreed the suit only against the defendants 1 and 2 and dismissed the suit as against the defendant No. 3. The defendants 1 and 2 remained ex parte before the trial Court. The judgment and decree of the trial Court in so far it decreed the suit as against the defendants 1 and 2 became final in the absence of any challenge by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Hence, this appeal is by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree, referred to above, passed by the trial Court only in so far it dismissed the suit as against the defendant No. 3. The defendant No. 3 is the respondent in this appeal.3. The plaintiff's case is as follows:- The plaintiff is a company regist...
Smt. Vidya Vs. Anil Kumar Lakotia
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT711
Motilal B. Naik, J.1. This appeal is filed against the dismissal of O.P. No. 1186 of 1990 by the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court Hyderabad (Temp) filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act for custody of minor children, viz., Master Bharat Kumar and Baby Arti from the respondent-husband.2. Appellant herein is the wife and the respondent is the husband. It is the case of the appellant that their marriage took place in the year 1985 at Maheshwari Bhavan, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad as per Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage, the respondent was not satisfied with the articles and gifts presented by the parents of the appellant and there was a demand from the respondent-husband and his family members for getting more dowry. In the month of October, 1990 the parents of the appellant were at Rajasthan and on the intervening night of 4th and 5th October, 1990 the appellant was beaten mercilessly and was driven out of the house with a pre-planned scheme to drive her from ...
Meruva Satyanarayana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALD130; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)394; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)348; 1996CriLJ1475
ORDER1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the Judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 66 of 1990 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. The petitioner has been convicted under Section 36(a)(b) & (c) of A.P. Excise Act 68 read with rules 19, 54 and 55 of A.P. Foreign Liquor and Indian Liquor Rules, 1970 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default to pay the fine amount, to undergo simple imprisonment for one week. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the substantial evidence on record in support of the conviction, has rightly refrained himself from arguing on merits, knowing the nature of the jurisdiction of this Court in Criminal Revision under Section 397(1) and 401 Cr.P.C. He contends that the petitioner is entitled to be given the benefit of the provisions of Section 4(1) of the probation of Offenders Act 58, in view of the fact that the offence is of highly techni...
Coromandel Lubricants Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Andhra Pra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-1995
Reported in: [1996]102STC274(AP)
V. Rajagopala Reddy, J. 1. The assessee, M/s. Coromandel Lubricants, Visakhapatnam, was a firm dealing in manufacturing and sale of paraffin wax and special lubricant oils. They consisted of four partners. For the year 1980-81, they filed nil returns, stating that the firm has been dissolved and a limited company in the name of M/s. Coromandel Lubricants Pvt. Ltd., has been formed, with the same four partners as directors, simultaneously transferring to the new company, the finished goods, plant and machinery, fittings, raw materials, laboratory equipment, stock of stores, furniture and car of the value of Rs. 9,59,455.28. The value of each item was shown, separately, as follows : Rs.Finished goods ... 4,46,960.02Raw materials ... 56,838.50Plant and machinery ... 3,46,928.44Electrical fittings ... 24,804.61Pipe and fittings ... 16,114.26Laboratory equipment ... 13,929.72Furniture ... 5,439.75Office equipment ... 1,837.62Motor car ... 11,104.00Stock of stores ... 35,464.36-------------....
Sagar Industries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-1995
Reported in: [1996]101STC317(AP)
S. Parvatha Rao, J.1. This special appeal is preferred by the appellant/dealer under section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 ('the Act', for short) questioning the order of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, the respondent herein, in CCT's ref. L.V.(2)/L.III(2)3174/85 dated April 18, 1989, made in exercise of his revisional powers under sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Act. The short but fatal attack is based on the bar of limitation. We find that the impugned order does not survive the attack. 2. The order sought to be revised by the Commissioner is of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Hyderabad-II Division, in Appeal No. C/178/82-83, dated March 25, 1983, setting aside the final assessment for the year 1981-82 under the Act to the extent of the disputed turnover of Rs. 9,31,740. According to the appellant, the said order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner was received by it on the same day, i.e., March 25, 1983. The period within which the said order co...
Kopparapu Venkata Subbaiah Vs. Gaddam Brahmam Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-1995
Reported in: 1997(4)ALT66
ORDERS. Dasaradharama Reddy, J.1. The question that arises in this revision petition is whether petition Under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure lies to set aside an auction which was held and confirmed in execution of a decree in the absence of any application under Order 21 Rule 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner decree holder was the highest bidder in the auction of the property held on 11-7-1988 in execution of decree dated 3-3-1987 in O.S.No. 361 of 1986 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Proddutur, obtained against first respondent-judgment debtor and his elder brother in respect of certain transactions carried on for the benefit of joint family of first and second respondents. The first respondent judgment debtor filed E.A.No. 572 of 1989 on 7-11-1989, Under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the sale which was confirmed on 26-9-1988 on the ground that property is not joint family property but belongs to the first respondent and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »