Andhra Pradesh Court October 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Naga Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. Mattam Parvataiah (Died) and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT325
M.N. Rao, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal is from the Judgment of a Learned Single Judge of this Court in A.S. No. 769 of 1978 (see: M. Parvathaiah v. B.N. Reddy, 1987 (2) ALT 597 allowing in part the appeal of the plaintiffs - protected tenants and granting declaration of their title in respect of the plaint schedule property and possession thereof with a further direction for enquiry into profits from the year 1969-70. The suit was laid by the respondents-plaintiffs seeking declaration of title in respect of the plaint schedule property, recovery of possession, declaration of their right to irrigate the lands with water from the two sources named therein, a consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstruction to the enjoyment of the irrigation channels of the two sources of irrigation in respect of the suit lands, a mandatory injunction to restore the irrigation channel that was destroyed by the defendants and to restore to its original condition an...
Adoni Cotton Mills, Unit of National Textiles Corporation (A.P.K.K. an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT552
C.V.N. Sastry, J. 1. M/s Adoni Cotton Mills, a unit of the National Textiles Corporation Ltd., (A Government of India Undertaking), Adoni, has filed this writ petition challenging the appellate order dated 12-10-1988 passed by the Chief Engineer (Electricity), South Zone, Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, Cuddapah, the first respondent herein, holding the petitioner liable to pay sum of Rs. 2,16,649-20 towards compensation to the Board for the malpractice alleged to have been committed by the petitioner in exceeding the connected load. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition may be stated briefly: 2. The Petitioner entered into a contract with the Electricity Board for the supply of electrical energy to its unit. Under the contract, the petitioner was sanctioned a load of 800 H.P. with a maximum demand of 500 K.V.A. with a view to undertake an expansion programme, the petitioner applied to the Board on 19-12-1979 for sanction of additional load. Even though the petit...
K. Subramanyeswara Rao and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT847
ORDERK.M. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners, as many as 32 in number, have made a prayer for quashing the proceedings initiated by the first respondent under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended by Act No. 68 of 1984, (in short, the 'Act'), in respect of their total Ac. 21.59 cents, as detailed hereafter, situate at village Kooramannapalem in Gajuwaka Mandal of Visakhapatnam as illegal:- DETAILS OF LAND________________________________________Survey No. AreaAcres Cents________________________________________68/3A 6.6369/1 0.6969/3 1.2169/4A 3.3969/4B 1.6969/5 4.0969/6A 1.2269/7 2.67______21.59________________________________________2. The petitioners claim themselves to be the owners of the said lands, having purchased the same between 1979 to 1984 under registered sale deeds. The said lands were sought to be acquired by publication of a notification under Section 4(1) of the Act on 26-10-1984 in the Official Gazet...
E. Murugaiah and anr. Vs. C. Ekambara Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT720
ORDERK.B. Siddappa, J.1. This revision is filed against the order passed in E.P.No. 13 of 1992 in O.S.No. 174 of 1989 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chittoor. The learned Additional Subordinate Judge passed the impugned order of arrest of the judgment-debtor for non-payment of the decretal amount.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner herein is a small farmer and the lower Court should have given the benefit of Act. No. 7 of 1977. He also submitted that the requirements of Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure are not met to order for the arrest etc.3. I see considerable force in the submission of the learned counsel. However the petitioner could not establish that he is a small farmer. The learned counsel (sic. Judge) has given cogent reasons for disbelieving the case of the petitioner herein on this aspect and the finding does not warrant interference. Further the finding that the petitioner is having sufficient means to ...
The Depot Manager, Apsrtc Bus Depot Vs. D.S. Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT416
M.N. Rao, J.1. This appeal by the Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Warangal-II Depot, Warangal is from the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No. 12607 of 1990 quashing the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal in I.D. No. 390 of 1988 dated 31-3-1990, by which the Tribunal upheld the order passed by the appellant herein removing the first respondent from service as a conductor of the Corporation. The learned judge also granted a consequential direction reinstating the first respondent into service with full backwages and all attendant benefits like seniority, future promotions etc., but subject to the condition that the employer-Corporation was entitled to withhold Rs. 2,186-25 from the backwages payable to the first respondent-workman.2. The first respondent was on duty on 25-8-1986 conducting the bus bearing Regn. No.APZ 8687 belonging to the Corporation, which was carrying 16 passengers, on the route -...
Kadapagunta Swaminatha Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT(Cri)228; 1996CriLJ1387
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 4-11-1995 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor in Sessions Case No. 119 of 1992, convicting the accused-appellant for the offence under Section 304, Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of ten years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of two months. 2. The prosecution case in brief may be summarised thus : The deceased Mohan Reddy was the nephew of Sri. G. Krishna Reddi (P.W. 1) who was a resident of Nadimooru village. The accused Swaminatha Reddi is the resident of Mitta Indlu. P.W. 1 was running a Fair Price Shop in the village, and in regard to the alleged irregularities committed by him, the accused had given a news item in some newspapers some time back before the occurrence of the incident in question. Thus, there was some enmity between these two, and as the d...
N. Raja Reddy Vs. Vice-chairman and M.D. Apsrtc, Hyd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1995
Reported in: 1998(2)ALD317
ORDER1. As in both the cases common question of law is involved since both the writ petitioners are disposed by a common order.2. The Petitioners are challenging the circular issued by the APSRTC (for short Corporation) issuing No. LCI /402(16)/ dated 6-1-1990 including the deductions of notional increment already awarded to the petitioners and for consequential fixation of pay taking into account the lost notional increment and for releasing the physical monetary benefits from the date of award became enforceable.3. For proper appreciation of the facts, I will narrate the facts submitted in WP No. 11182/92. The petitioner was working as a conductor in the Corporation at Sircilla Depot and subsequently his services were terminated. Aggrieved by the said termination order the petitioner raised an Industrial Dispute and the same was referred by the Government for adjudication in the following terms: 1. Whether the Depot' Manager, Karimnagar is justified in removing Sri N.Raja Reddy, Ex-C...
Micro Raj Electronics (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Authority Under Minimum Wages Ac ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT202; (1996)ILLJ1111AP
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. This batch of Six Writ Petitions is filed challenging the orders of the 1st respondent in condoning the delay of 777 days in presenting the application by the 2nd respondent under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act.2. It is submitted by the petitioner - management that 2nd respondent filed the applications claiming difference of minimum wages in respect of the workmen employed by the petitioners especially for the period from June 1, 1993 to July 17, 1995, while filing the said claim application, the 2nd respondent filed a Memo seeking condonation of delay on the ground that he took over the charge as Labour Officer, Circle-I, Ranga Reddy district on June 10, 1994 and he did not inspect the establishment prior to June 25, 1995. When he conducted inspection on June 25, 1995, he could find that the management did not pay minimum wages for the aforesaid period to its employees. Therefore, the Inspector submitted that there was a delay of two years, one month and...
Venigalla Suguna Vs. S.V. Prasad, I.A.S. Vice Chairman and Managing Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT204; (1996)IILLJ321AP
P.S. Mishra, C .J.1. Heard 2. Contemners have not taken any lesson from the order of the Court, dated July 6, 1995 in which it is recorded that learned counsel appearing for them produced ah office order, dated June26, 1995, by the Regional Manager, Vijayawada Region, appointing the petitioner as Attender under Regulation No. 17 of the Employees' (Recruitment) Regulations of the Corporation and brought a cheque, dated July 4, 1995, issued by the Deputy Chief Accounts Officer, Vijayawada Region, for a sum of Rs.4000/- drawn in favour of the petitioner, to show that there was a genuine compliance of the directions of the Court in Writ Appeal No. 112 of 1995, dated February 20, 1995 and finally they have landed themselves to the present situation in which the Court has no option but to hold that they have shown not only disregard but disobedience to the order of the Court. Direction to give compassionate appointment to the widow of a deceased employee, who died in harness, is allegedly co...
Maize Beedar Agriculture Research Station and anr. Vs. Smt. Silar Bee
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)ALT667
P.S. Mishra, C.J.1. Heard. Before we proceed to dispose of this appeal, we clear some of the misapprehensions which are advanced as grounds for not granting to the Writ Petitioner-respondent a substantive appointment in spite of earlier direction of this Court in W.P.No.17738 of 1988. Section 9(a) and (b) of the Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments of Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff Pattern and Pay Structure) Act, 1994 (Act No. 2 of 1994) which is in force with effect from 25-11-1993 contains inter alia that anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, tribunal or other authority, the claims for regular appointment of all daily wage employees and persons appointed on a temporary basis, shall stand abated and accordingly,-(a) no suit or other proceeding shall be instituted, maintained or continued in any Court, tribunal or other authority by the daily wage or temporary appointees against the Government or any person or authority whatsoever for the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »