Andhra Pradesh Court January 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kotam Appa Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-10-1995
Reported in: 1997ACJ529; 1995(1)ALT499; (1995)IILLJ436AP
S. Paravatha Rao, J.1. The New India Assurance Company Limited, the appellant herein, questions the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Rangareddy District Zone dated 11-2-1991 in W. C. Case No. 177 of 1989. 2. That case arose on an application dated 2-9-1989 made by the 1st respondent herein claiming compensation of Rs. 1,03,990/- for personal injuries caused to him in an accident that occurred while driving an oil tanker bearing Registration No. AHU 135 at Ananthagiri Hills on 15-6-1989. At the time of the accident, the 1st respondent was working as a driver under the 2nd respondent herein. In his application he stated that he was earning Rs. 1,500/- per month at that time and that he was aged about 30 years. In the accident the suffered fracture of the right thigh bone and also compound fracture of his right hand and other grievous injuries. He also stated in his application that as a result of the injuries received by him in that accident, he suffered total perman...
Sikhakolli Venkata Subba Rao Vs. Grandhi Punnarao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-1995
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT491
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. The Petitioner who is a tenant of the building in Vijayawada belonging to the respondents, suffered a decree of eviction in a rent control case. The said order was confirmed in appeal - RCA No. 44/83 by the Rent Control Appellate Authority and the appellate order was confirmed by this Court in C.R.P. No. 2960/92. While dismissing the C.R.P. on 25-9-92, this Court granted four month's time for eviction. Thereafter, a suit was sought to be filed in the Court of the Principal District Munsif, Vijayawada seeking a declaration that the order passed by the Rent Controller as confirmed by the appellate authority in RCA No. 44/83 and by this Court in CRP 2960/92 is without jurisdiction and such decree cannot be enforced or executed. The Petitioner also sought the relief of thereby evicting the petitioner from the suit building. The proposed suit was not numbered by the Principal District Munsif and the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. by an ord...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›