Andhra Pradesh Court March 1994 Judgments

Sri Ahmed MohiddIn Vs. the State Bank of Hyderabad, Rep. by Its Managi ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT609

ORDERP.L.N. Sarma, J.1. This Writ Petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of the Board of Directors of the State Bank of Hyderabad, dated 7-12-1990 in and by the terms of which the petitioner was inflicted with the penalty of placing him at the start of the basic pay applicable to officers of JMGS-I cadre viz., at Rs. 2,100-00 bringing him down by nine stages from the basic pay the petitioner was drawing viz., Rs. 3,180-00. The Board of Directors also debarred the petitioner from being considered for promotion for a period of five years and also directed recovery of the amount of Rs. 550-00 which amount was said to have been paid by the Bank to one Sri Bandappa Kallappa Gandge. The said order imposing penalty was communicated by the Managing Director in his letter dt.13-2-1991 to the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking a direction from this Court for quashing those proceedings by the issuance of writ of certiorari.2. The relevant facts are as follows:The petitioner was a...

M/S. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. the Steel City Consume ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami, President: 1. Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, whereby it directed the Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs. 18,000/- to the defactocomplainant towards damages with interest, the above appeal is preferred by the Insurance Company. Certain facts are not in dispute. That Smt. P. Padma was the owner of the vehicle and she had Insurance Policy in her name. The complainant claimed that she purchased that Vehicle from Smt. P. Padma in June 1989, but actually in August 1989 according to the complainant, she paid premium for the vehicle to the Insurance Company, but the premium paid was in the name of Smt. P. Padma and not in the name of the complainant. The registration of the vehicle was actually transferred on 15-11-1989. There was no intimation to the Insurance Company even after June 1989 that there was a transfer of the vehicle in the name of the complainant. While so, the vehicle met with an accident on March 1990. Since the vehicle was damaged in the accide...

Branch Manager, Sahara India Vs. Pennumallu Ramu and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The complainants, that is the respondents herein have deposited in all a sum of Rs. 7000/- with the appellant that is, the opposite Party in C.D. No. 825 of 1991. 2. According to the scheme, they have to make deposit every year and on maturity they will be entitled for refund of the same with bonus. But the complainants have paid only one instalment each and failed to pay the balance of the instalments. Therefore, they filed the complaint after expiry of five years period stating that they are entitled for refund of the actual deposit by them with interest. 3. This claim was opposed by the opposite party mainly on the ground that, according to the terms and conditions of the scheme, the complainants are not entitled to any interest as they have paid only one instalment each and thereafter committed default in payment of the instalments. Since the claim was made after the period of five years, after starting of the scheme, accordingly they are not ent...

B. Narayana Vs. Additional Tribunal-cum-addl. Labour Court and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1995)ILLJ476AP

ORDERSyed Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. The petitioner challenges the validity of the award dated April 26, 1990 in I.D. No. 48/83 passed by the first respondent and prays for a direction to the second respondent to promote him to the post of Line Inspector with effect from December 18, 1978 with further promotion to the post of Foreman Grade II with effect from June 28, 1992 with all consequential benefits.2. The dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent relates to seniority and consequential promotion to the post of Line Inspector. The petitioner was appointed as Helper in the office of the Divisional Engineer (Electrical), A.P. State Electricity Board, for short 'the Board', Nagarjunasagar. About two years earlier, the third respondent was appointed in the office of the Divisional Engineer, Lines Division of the Board at Hyderabad. The third respondent was promoted as Lineman in the Lines Division, City Circle, on September 17, 1968. The petitioner was promoted as Lineman on ...

Belgees Begum Etc. Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1994AP316; 1994(1)ALT649

ORDERThese two writ petitions have been posted before me for orders. 2. These matters arise in the following circumstances:--These two writ petitions along with Seven Civil Revision Petitions raise a common point. These matters were heard by late G.V.L. Narasimha Rao, J. It is admitted before me by counsel on either side that their arguments were heard by the learned Judge and judgments in both the writ petitions were dictated in open Court to the Court Master on 4-11-1993 and 6-11-1993 respectively. But before they were transcribed and placed before the learned Judge for singnature, the learned Judge unfortunately passed away.3. The Registrar (Judl.) verified and also recorded the statements of the Court Officers, who attended the Court on the respective dates, and found that the Judgments were dictated in open Court to the Court-master by the learned Judge on the respective dates, but by the time they were transcribed and placed before the learned Judge for signature, the learned Jud...

Y. Prameela Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]220ITR271(AP)

1. The petitioner, Smt. Y. Prameela, is the wife of one Y. Yadaiah Goud, who died on 7th June, 1990. The late Yadaiah Goud fell in arrears of payment of penalty under ss. 271(1)(a) and 271(1)(c) of the IT Act in respect of the asst. yrs. 1969-70 to 1983-84 aggregating Rs. 2,94,078. On 16th Feb., 1989, the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO), respondent No. 2 herein, issued a sale proclamation in respect of site measuring 350 sq. yards adjacent to 'house bearing No. 4-8-307 (4-8-2078) opposite RTC bus stand, Gowliguda', fixing the date of sale as 16th March, 1989, and the time as 11.30 a. m., the venue being Aayakar Bhavan, the premises where the tax recovery office is located. On 13th March, 1989, the assessee filed a written representation before the second respondent stating that the appeals preferred against the levy of penalties were coming up for hearing on 17th March, 1989, and 23rd March, 1989, and, therefore, the proposed sale should be adjourned. It appears that the request for adjourn...

Smt. Y. Prameela Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1996)134CTR(AP)479

BY THE COURT :The petitioner, Smt. Y. Prameela, is the wife of one Y. Yadaiah Goud, who died on 7th June, 1990. The late Yadaiah Goud fell in arrears of payment of penalty under ss. 271(1)(a) and 271(1)(c) of the IT Act in respect of the asst. yrs. 1969-70 to 1983-84 aggregating Rs. 2,94,078. On 16th Feb., 1989, the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO), respondent No. 2 herein, issued a sale proclamation in respect of site measuring 350 sq. yards adjacent to 'house bearing No. 4-8-307 (4-8-2078) opposite RTC bus stand, Gowliguda', fixing the date of sale as 16th March, 1989, and the time as 11.30 a. m., the venue being Aayakar Bhavan, the premises where the tax recovery office is located. On 13th March, 1989, the assessee filed a written representation before the second respondent stating that the appeals preferred against the levy of penalties were coming up for hearing on 17th March, 1989, and 23rd March, 1989, and, therefore, the proposed sale should be adjourned. It appears that the request ...

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited Vs. Sri N.V. Chowdhary and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(2)ALT620

J. Eswara Prasad, J.1. These appeals arise out of the common judgment of the learned single Judge. L.P.A. No. 143/90 is by Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Visakhapatnam (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') against the order in CM.P.No. 18977/88 in C.R.P. No. 3414/84. C.M.A. No. 170/90 is filed by N.V. Choudary (referred to as 'the contractor) against the same order. C.M.A.No. 171/90 is also filed by the contractor against the order in C.M.P. No. 13899/88 in C.R.P.No. 3414/84 in which the first respondent is the company.2. Visakhapatnam Steel Project Authority is engaged in the construction of steel plant at Visakhapatnam. The company is one of the Public Sector Undertakings, which was given one of the works on a turn-key basis. The company, in its turn, invited tenders for the construction of civil engineering works of various units in the blast furnace zone in the steel plant. The contractor made a tender for the civil engineering works in Group II on 21-9-82. After ...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Adoni Vanaspathi Manufacturers

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1994]207ITR240(AP)

T.N.C. Rangarajan, J.1. The brief facts relating to this reference are that the assessee is a company which had established a new industrial undertaking and claimed relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For the assessment year 1975-76, the previous year was the period October 27, 1973, to November 13, 1974. On October 27, 1973, the opening capital was Rs. 4,88,117 and there was a borrowed capital of Rs. 10,36,279 and closing balance on that day was Rs. 14,67,677. Originally, the assessee had been allowed deduction under section 80J in respect of the closing balance as on that date. The assessment was alter revised to reduce the relief by computing the deduction on the basis of the opening balance on that date. The assessee appealed without success but in the second appeal, the Appellate Tribunal accepted the claim of the assessee that the deduction under section 80J should be based on the capital employed on the first day which included transactions of that day and refl...

The Marketing Manager, ‘samayam’ Vs. Pulle Subrahmanya Sastr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The opposite party i.e. Marketing Manager, Samayam, Telugu Daily, Hyderabad, is the appellant. With a very good intention of starting a Telugu Daily by name Samayam, the opposite party advertised in the papers calling for quotation for transporting the papers on certain routes in East Godavari District. The routes are, so far as we are concerned (1) Rajahmundry to Kesanakurru and (2) Ravulapalem to Kotipalli. The complainant believing that the said paper would be started very soon, agreed to transport the paper in the routes aforementioned. According to the terms of the agreement, he deposited for both routes a sum of Rs. 6,500/- by way of demand draft which was evidenced by a receipt dated 1.3.86, passed by the opposite parties acknowledging the receipt of the same on 3.3.86. It is the case of the complainant that after making the deposit, he waited nearly for a period of 6 years i.e. from 1986 till 1991, with a hope that the opposite party will sta...