Andhra Pradesh Court February 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Non-gazetted Government Employees Co-operative Building Society Li ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT203
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. This revision-petition is directed against the order dated 9-11-1989 in E.A. No. 1076/88 in E.P. No. 578/87 in O.S. No. 1338/84 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Vijayawada.2. Petitioner is the defendant in the suit, O.S. No. 1338/84, filed by the respondent. The suit was for recovery of Rs. 7,328/-, being the balance amount deposited by the respondent-plaintiff, along with interest. Petitioner is the Non-Gazetted Government Employees Co-operative Building Society Limited, Vijayawada. The object of the petitioner-society is to carry on for the benefit of its members the trade of buying and building, selling, hiring and developing of lands in accordance with the co-operative principles and to give loans to its members for construction of new dwelling houses. Respondent is one of the members of the petitioner-society and he was allotted a plot bearing No. 18 situated at Shyamnagar, NGOs colony, Labbipet, Vijayawada. As per bye-law No. 28 (d) of the...
Anantha Chandra Mouli Vs. National Institute of Small Industry Extensi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT622
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to count the petitioner's service with effect from 8-11-1976 and to refix his seniority by placing him as senior to Respondents 2 to 15 with consequential benefits like promotion etc.2. The petitioner's case is that he was selected by a regularly constituted selection committee as a Telephone Operator after conducting an interview on 21-5-1975. He was appointed by Proceedings dated 6-6-1975 upto 11-7-1975 in a leave vacancy. Subsequently he was appointed again by Proceedings dated 14-7-1975 in a maternity leave vacancy. According to the petitioner, his name was sponsored by the Employment Exchange alongwith others and he was selected to fill-up a clear vacancy and that there were two permanent posts of Telephone Operators vacant in the first respondent-Institute at the time of his selection. However, he was issued appointment orders dated 10-10-1977, 6-11-1977, 14-4-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›