Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court December 1994 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 06 1994

M.V. Mangapathy Rao, Librarian Hmt-waco Education Society, Hyderabad V ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-06-1994

Reported in: 1995(1)ALT407

ORDERT.N.C. Rangarajan, J.1. The petitioner complains that the Respondent has wilfully disobeyed the order of the Labour Court dated 8-4-1994, which directed the respondent to pay Rs. 800/- towards compensation, back-wages and half of the wages, beginning from April, 1994, and that the deposit shall be made by the respondent within seven days from the date of the order. In the alternative, the respondent was given the option to reinstate the petitioner in any suitable job on the last pay drawn scale in lieu of payment of half of the wages from April, 1994, onwards. According to the petitioner, the sum of Rs. 800/- has not been paid as stipulated and no steps were taken to give him the alternative job or to give him the wages as directed in order. Thereupon, an interim order was made in the contempt petition on 7-11-1994 derivation the respondent to comply with the order. The Respondent has filed a counter-affidavit stating that the order of the Labour court was received by it on 27-5-1...


Dec 06 1994

Kanala Ramaiah and anr. Vs. D. Venkata Ramana

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-06-1994

Reported in: 1996(1)ALT127

ORDERLingaraja Rath, J.1. The revision petitioners, the first petitioner being the father of the second, are the judgment-debtors in E.P.No. 25 of 1992 in which they raised a plea of the decree being nullity and not executable against them, as they are small farmers entitled to the protection of the A.P. Agricultural Indebtedness (Relief) Act, 1977, Act 7 of 1977 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The plea having been negatived after considering the evidence led in the proceedings, the present revision has been filed. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the order of the learned Munsif suffers from material irregularity inasmuch as he has perversed himself in not deciding the issues in question but has held the, petitioners to be not small farmers only because, he held, they maintained a Hero Honda Motor Cycle, and that in another suit filed by the brother of the judgment holder, they had not taken the plea of being small farmers. 3. The respondent de...


Dec 06 1994

L.i.C. of India and Others Vs. N. Lakshmi Narayana

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Dec-06-1994

Mrs. J. Ananda Lakshmi, Member: 1. Aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, Chittoor, the opposite parties (L.I.C) in C.D. No. 187/93 preferred this appeal. The respondent herein is the complainant, who filed a complaint to direct the appellants to issue Jeevan Surabhi policy bond for the financial year 1992- 93 with date back facility; (2) to accept the 2nd premium without collecting late fee; (3) to pay a sum of Rs. 37,264/- towards loss and damages and to pay Rs. 12,340/- towards first premium paid with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of remittance till realisation and costs of the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows : The complainant made a proposal dated 25.3.1993 to insure his life under Jeevan Surabhi policy for one lakh of rupees with date back facility from 30.8.1992 with a view to claim income, tax rebate for the year 1992-93 and paid the first premium amount of Rs. 12,340/- on 31.3.1993.But the opposite parties have not issued the policy...


Dec 04 1994

The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-04-1994

Reported in: 1994(3)ALT653

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by our learned Brother, B.Subhashan Reddy, J. in Writ Petition No. 21121 of 1994, dt. 2-12-1994. That Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Alladi Raj Kumar, a Member of Parliament by way of public interest litigation. The relief sought for in the Writ Petition is as follows:'To issue an appropriate writ.........directing the respondents particularly the 1st respondent to forthwith countermand and rescind the elections to the Legislative Assembly constituencies located in the districts of Warangal, Karimnagar, Nizamabad and Adilabad and save the lives of citizens and enforce the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution to the electorate of the four districts'.2. The Writ Petition was filed on 30-11-1994. It may be noticed that the elections to the Assembly constituencies in the four districts referred to above are scheduled to be held tomorrow on...


Dec 02 1994

Gaddipati Sambrajyam and anr. Vs. Panguluri Mahalakshmamma and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-02-1994

Reported in: 1995(1)ALT305

ORDERB.K. Somasekhara, J.1. These two revision petitions involve similar questions of law and fact and arise out of a common judgment dated 30-4-93 in C.M.A.Nos. 5/93 and 11/93 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Bapatla. They were preferred against the common order dated 25-11-92 in I.A.Nos. 1264/91 and 1265/91 in O.S.No. 147/91 on the file of the District Munsif, Bapatla.2. The learned Munsif Magistrate while allowing the applications afforded the relief of temporary injunction to the plaintiffs in the suit restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession of items 1 and 2 of the plaint schedule properties. Item No. 1 is an agricultural land with D.No. 389/5 with an extent of Ac. 1.33 guntas whereas item No. 2 is a residential house. Aggrieved by such orders in favour of the present petitioners who are the plaintiffs in the suit, the respondents herein who are the defendants in the suit, took the matter in appeal which was allowed by the learned Sub-Judge thereby dismissing...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial