Andhra Pradesh Court September 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Katta Yesuratnam Vs. Commissioner, Land Revenue, A.P., Hyderabad and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-20-1993
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT200
ORDER1. This writ petition questions the order of cancellation of assignment of land made in favour of Turka Chennaiah. Turka Chennaiah was assigned with a land of Ac. 1-93 cents in S.No.492/7 of Gorentla village. The assignment was made in the year 1974. The dispute regarding the agreement to share the profits is not at all relevant. Suffice it to say that assignment was ordered in the name of T. Chennaiah and patta was issued consequent thereto. The assignment was granted under B.S.O.15 (12) (3). The conditions enumerated are that the assignment is heritable but not alienable, that the land should be brought under cultivation within three years thereof and that the assignee and his family members alone shall be in possession of the same. Initially the order of cancellation was made. Against that order an appeal was preferred. The Appellate authority remanded the matter for fresh disposal to the primary authority. The primary authority confirmed the order. Against that order an appeal...
Acme Tiles and Building Products, Rep. by Its Prop. Narra Kotaiah Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT359
ORDERG.V.L. Narasimha Rao, J.1. This revision petition is directed at the instance of the petitioner-plaintiff against the order passed in I.A.No. 1410 of 1992 in O.S.No. 6258 of 1991 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The petitioner-plaintiff filed O.S.No. 6258 of 1991 on the file of the IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the respondents-defendants for perpetual injunction restraining the respondents-defendants from interfering with its peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. Along with the suit, the petitioner-plaintiff filed a petition I.A.No. 1131 of 1991 under Order 39, Rule 1, CPC praying for an interim injunction.3. On an appraisal of the oral and documentary evidence adduced by both parties and also the commissioner's report, the trial Court partly allowed I.A.No. 1131 of 1991 with the following observations:(a) The respondents 1 to 4 and their men are restrained from interfering with the possessi...
Narasingoju Shanmukha Chary and anr. Vs. Nirma Sampath Kumar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-1993
Reported in: 1(1994)ACC214
Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the claimants having been aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.1.1987 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nalgonda in OP 373/85 granting a compensation of Rs. 15,000/-. Their grievance is that it is meagre and they pray for enhancement of the same.2. The deceased Bhanu Prakash, a young promising boy aged 8 years, died in a motor accident. There is no dispute with regard to the accident and the liability of the respondents for the compensation payable to the claimants. The only thing to be considered is the quantum of compensation. The lower Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 15,000/- as against the claim of Rs. 40,000/-. Even under 'No fault liability' irrespective of the age of the deceased, the compensation payable is Rs. 15,000/-. The lower Court has not taken into consideration the loss suffered by the parents on account of the premature death of their son aged 8 years. In Anjamuri Zeroge v. Gudala Rama Nagesw...
Food Inspector, Bhimavaram Municipality Vs. Kopouravari Venkateswarulu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-16-1993
Reported in: 1994CriLJ414
V. Sivaraman Nair, J.1. This appeal is filed by the State assailing the acquittal of the respondent-accused in C.C. No. 214 of 1991 by the II Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram. 2. The matter comes before us on a reference by our learned brother Justice G. Radhakrishna Rao. The reference was provoked by two decisions of Justice Y. Bhaskara Rao in K. Kameswara Rao v. State of A.P., 1990 APLJ (Crl) 189 and Food Inspector, Karimnagar v. Kothakonda Shankar, 1991 APLJ (Crl) 116. 3. Our learned brother Justice Y. Bhaskara Rao in the above two decisions held that if the samples of food articles, which were purchased by the Food Inspector, are sent for analysis in polythene bags, there will be violation of Rule 14 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). In the former case, the learned Judge set aside the conviction by the trial court and acquitted the accused. In the latter case, he dismissed the appeal filed by the Food Inspector, uph...
B. Satyanarayana Vs. the Joint Collector (C.S.) and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-16-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT168
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the 1st respondent dated 24-7-1993 passed in appeal against the order of the 2nd respondent dated 20-3-1993, the present writ petition is filed.2. The authorisation granted to the petitioner to run Fair Price Shop at Dulapalli Village, Ranga Reddy District, was cancelled by the Revenue Divisional Officer on 20-3-1993 on the allegation that a quantity of 23 quintals of rice and 138 liters of kerosene lifted on 27-7-1992 was not brought to the shop nor entered in the stock register. The authorisation of the petitioner was suspended pending enquiry on 12-8-1992. Appeal against the cancellation order was rejected by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District by the impugned order.3. It appears that there was an enquiry under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act in respect of the confiscation of the stock for the same irregularity. The petitioner was found guilty of the charge in the proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essent...
Sammeta Rama Subba Rao Vs. President, Kaikaluru Irrigation and Power D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1993
Reported in: AIR1994AP77; 1994(2)ALT39
ORDER1. Challenging the Surcharge Order passed under S. 60(1) of the A. P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, in proceedings Re. No.4277/86-D dated 10-7-1991 by the Second Respondent this Writ Petition is filed. Before initiation of proceedings under S. 60(1) of the Act, inspection was conducted by the officer concerned under S. 52 of the Act. The Inspection report pointed out that the petitioner was to be surcharged. Basing on the same, proceedings were initiated under S. 60(1) of the Act. Show cause notice dated 24-4-1991 was issued to the petitioner to show cause why surcharge order should not be passed for realisation of Rs.41,164/- as opined by the Inspecting Officer. The petitioner filed a reply dated 6-5-1991 denying his liability to pay the same. Strictly speaking, he disputed all the allegations levelled against him in the show cause notice issued for surcharging him. In such cases, as a necessary corollary, an enquiry ought to have preceded the surcharge order. The principal po...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. C.D. Munirathnam Reddi (Owner) and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT237
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Insurance Company having been aggrieved by the judgment dated 17-6-1993 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court (S. Dasaratharama Reddy, J.) in C.M.A. No.1644 of 1991.2. In an accident which took place on 17-9-1984 the claimant received injuries which ultimately resulted in amputation of her leg. She filed two applications, one under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and the other under Section 110-A claiming compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor, after considering the entire material on record and the evidence adduced by both the parties, found that the claimant is entitled to compensation for a total sum of Rs. 24,950/- to be recovered from the owner and dismissed the claim as against the Insurance Company, the appellant herein. Having been aggrieved by the said judgment of the lower Tribunal, the owner of the vehicle preferred an appeal. The appeal was allowed i...
Nannapaneni Saraswathamma (Died) Per L.R.-p. Dharma Rao Vs. Sub-collec ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT274
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to refer the proceedings in Award No. 19 of 1986 dated 31-8-1986 relating to the land belonging to the petitioner to the Civil Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of compensation. The petitioner's land was acquired by invoking the provisions contained in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The award was passed on 31-8-1986. The notice under Section 12(2) of the Act was served on the petitioner on 15-9-1986. The petitioner made a representation complaining that her lands are very much fertile and valuable and that the prevailing market value was Rs. 150/- per square yard. She also stated in the representation that two crops were grown fetching annual income of Rs. 6,000/- per acre and that the land acquisition proceedings may be dropped or in the alternative they may be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the appeal in the Supreme Court. As no action has bee...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. C.D. Munirathanam Reddi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1993
Reported in: I(1994)ACC314; 1994ACJ1074
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant insurance company having been aggrieved by the judgment dated 17.6.1993 passed by a learned single Judge of this court (S. Dasaratharama Reddy, J.) in C.M.A. No. 1644 of 1991.2. In an accident which took place on 17.9.1984, the claimant received injuries which ultimately resulted in amputation of her leg. She filed two applications, one under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and the other under Section 110-A claiming compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor, after considering the entire material on record and the evidence adduced by both the parties, found that the claimant is entitled to compensation for a total sum of Rs. 24,950/- to be recovered from the owner and dismissed the claim as against the insurance company, the appellant herein. Having been aggrieved by the said judgment of the Tribunal, the owner of the vehicle preferred an appeal. The appeal was allowed in pa...
R.B. Subrahmanyam and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT462; 1993(3)ALT462; [1994(68)FLR1065]
ORDEREswara Prasad, J. 1. On merger of two services in the respondents-Electricity Board, namely, Chief Controller of Accounts and Chief Accounts Officers, the employees working in both the offices formed a common cadre and an integrated list of the employees working in both the offices formed a common cadre and an integrated list of the employees, who are merged into a common cadre was published on 17-9-1976. One J. V. Satyanarayana Murthy was shown at serial No. 49 in the said integrated list. The petitioners are all seniors to the said Satyanarayana Murthy as per the integrated list. The grievance of the petitioners is that they are not given the scale of pay as was given to their junior Satyanarayana Murthy, and therefore, they pray for directions to the petitioner on par with the their junior mentioned at serial No. 49 of the integrated list and for further direction to the respondent was to pay all the arrears upto date after fixing pay and allowances. In the counter filed by the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »