Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court June 1993 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 14 1993

V. Devaraju Vs. Sivappa and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-14-1993

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT424

ORDERS. Dasaradha Rama Reddi, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dt. 11-12-1987 in I.A.No. 409/1987 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Addl. District Judge, Madanapalle refusing to restore I.A.No. 201/87 filed by the appellant-claimant and which was dismissed for default. The appellant-claimant has filed Original Petition in the Tribunal with a delay of 82 days and filed I.A.No. 201/87 praying the Courts to condone the delay. No appeal has been preferred by the claimant against I.A.No. 201/87 dismissing the application for condonation of delay, which has resulted in dismissal of the O.P. itself.2. Preliminary objection has been taken by the office at the time of admission that the CM. A. is not maintainable under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, as the order passed in I.A.No. 409/87 is not an award. I uphold the objection of the office. In Babumiyan v. Mastan, 1985 (1) ALT 47, a Division Bench of this Court has held that the order ref...


Jun 14 1993

P. Nedumaran Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-14-1993

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT291; 1993(2)ALT(Cri)188

M.N. Rao, J.1. These two Habeas Corpus applications are interconnected: facts alleged and questions of law arising for consideration also are common apart from the fact that the petitioner is the same and so, we are inclined to dispose of both the cases by this common judgment.2. The petitioner - Sri. P. Nedumaran - swears that he is a former member of the Tamilnadu Legislative Assembly and a supporter of the cause of the Sri. Lankan Tamils. He claims that the mother of Captain V. Jayachandran, one of the detenus, instructed him to file. W.P.No. 3792 of 1993 and the other detenus also instructed him through his counsel, Sri. S. Dorai Swamy, who interviewed them on 5-3-1993 at Visakhapatnam, to file the writ petition.3. W.P.No. 3792 of 1993 was filed for release of nine accused - (1) M/s. V. Jayachandran, (2). K. Satkunalingam, (3) V. Krishnamoorty, (4) K. Nayagan, (5) S. Sivarajan, (6) S. Indalingam, (7) A. Subhas Chandran, (8) S. Balakrishnan and (9) T. Mohan - against whom F.I.R was ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial