Andhra Pradesh Court April 1993 Judgments

P. Yellaiah and Others Vs. the Executive Engineer (Pwd) (Randb) Nation ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1994AP1; 1993(2)ALT91

ORDER1. In this writ petition, the relief sought for is to grant the benefit of re-determination of compensation underSection 28A of the Land Acquisition Act on the analogy of the award passed for the similarly situated lands under the same notification.2. Mr. R. Narasimha Reddy, the learned Government Pleader strenuously contends that O.P. No. 4/76 was decided on 31-3-1981 and as such, the same has to be construed as the date of Award as contemplated under Section 3(d) of the Land Acquisition Act. If that is the only factor, I have got to accept his contention and straightway dismiss the writ petition. But, some of the claimants in O.P. No. 4/76, who were set ex parte have filed a petition under LA. No.427/88 invoking the provisions of Order 9 Rule 13 to set aside the order and the same was allowed. Restoring the claim, the Court of Subordinate Judge, Nalgonda has passed an Award on 6-12-1988 enhancing the compensation on the analogy of other claimants in the said O. P. which was alre...

The Telecom Assistant Engineer and Another Vs. Dr. C. Reddeppa M.D.

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The opposite parties in C.D. No. 440 of 1992 on the file of the District Forum, Ongole are the appellants in this appeal. The respondent herein is the subscriber of telephone No. 2939 in Ongole. It has STD facility. For nearly three years prior to the issuing of the bill dated 1.7.1992, the bi-monthly bills range between Rs. 500/- to Rs. 900/-. When the bill dated 1.7.92 was issued for a sum of Rs. 8430/- the respondent herein failed the above complaint alleging that the bill issued was abnormally high and that there was some fault in the meter reading or billing. As the representation made to the appellant did not yield any result, it is prayed in the C.D. that the respondent may be directed to collect Rs. 600/- being the average amount for the last 5 or 6 years. 2. The opposite parties submitted that on receiving complaint the line circuit and meter circuit of the petitioner were checked besides the rountine checks made periodically, and it was fou...

C.W.C. Wines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, Vij ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1995]99STC178(AP)

V. Sivaraman Nair, J. 1. What the petitioner seeks in this writ petition is a direction to the respondent to implement the order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Guntur, which was passed in Appeal Nos. 64 and 66 of 1991-92, dated June 21, 1991. 2. Counsel submits that under rule 35 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), it is obligatory on the part of the assessing authority to refund, within two months from the date of the communication of the order, any excess tax and surcharge or fee found to have been collected and additional tax and surcharge or fee which is found to be due, in the manner as if it were a tax and surcharge assessed by himself. Counsel submits that in view of the obligatory nature of the provisions in the Rules, the assessing authority has no escape than to refund the excess tax and surcharge, on completion of the period of two months from the date of the order of the appellate or revisi...

The Principal, Sbrtm Law College and Another Vs. S. Md. Habeebullah an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. This appeal is against the order of the Cuddapah District Forum which awarded Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation to be paid by the authorities of Law College to a student for not allowing him to sit for the examination. The complainant in the original dispute was a fourth year student of the S.B.R.T.M. Law College, Cuddapah. He was to appear for the IV B.L. examination scheduled to be held on 12th November, 1991. He paid the examination fee and the university had sent the Hall Ticket to the college. The student approached the college authorities for the hall ticket on 9th November, 1991. It was not given for the reason that some library books were due from him. On 11th November he returned all the library books which were noted against his name in the records. The case of the student was that even after he returned all the books the authorities refused to give the hall ticket and consequently he could not appear for the examination. He claimed a compe...