Andhra Pradesh Court March 1993 Judgments

Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Government of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1994]92STC419(AP)

P.L.N. Sarma, J.1. This Writ petition was filed seeking declaration that the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of interest-free sales tax loan under the scheme introduced by the first respondent in G.O. Ms. No. 224, Industries and Commerce Department, dated March 9, 1976, by holding that the provisions of the A.P. Interest-free Sales Tax Loans for Industries (Imposition of Ceiling) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') do not affect the rights of the petitioner to claim the abovementioned incentive. 2. The writ petition was filed on the basis of the following facts alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition : The petitioner, which is a public limited company having its registered office at Adoni, is engaged in the business of manufacture of caustic soda and other allied products. It was set up at Gandiparla village, Kurnool district, which is an industrially backward area. The unit is established at a total cost of Rs. 30 (thirty) crores with the co...

Rapolu Rama Rao Vs. Thummapalli Kamaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(3)ALT284

ORDERG.V.L. Narasimha Rao, J.1. This revision petition is filed against the order in E.P. No. 132/88 in O.S. No. 369/82 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Order 21, Rule 16 and Order 21, Rule 37 C.P.C.2. Two affidavits have been filed in support of the present execution petition, one by the original decree holder, according to whom the consideration of Rs. 4,000/- was received by the original decree-holder from the transferee decree-holder and deed of transfer was executed on 19-11-88 and the original decree holder has no objection for the transferee decree holder executing the decree. The second affidavit filed by the transferee decree holder is to the effect that he has paid cast and the original decree holder transferred the decree in his favour and that the judgment-debtor is evading to pay the decretal amount in spite of being in possession of each and means. He, therefore, prayed to order arrest of the judgment-debtor.3. The judgment-debtor filed a counter s...

L. Chandrasekhara Sarma Vs. Jayanthi Vimala Kumari and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT276

ORDERG. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in both the revision petitions is:When an application filed by one person for being impleaded as legal representative of a deceased party to a litigation is allowed, is it competent for the Court to allow an application filed for the same purpose subsequently by another person?2. It is necessary to state a few facts for the purpose of disposal of these two civil revision petitions. During the pendency of an appeal A.S.No. 121 of 1986 on the file of the Second Additional District Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, the first appellant therein died. On an application being filed by the revision petitioner herein, he was ordered to be impleaded as third appellant to the appeal. Subsequently, the first respondent herein filed two applications-one for setting aside the order of abatement caused by the death of the first appellant and the other for impleading her as his legal representative, claiming herself to be h...

Syed Noor Ahmed Vs. Pandurangaiah, Chairman, thengo’s Co-op House ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The complainant, a member of N.G.Os. Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. Mahabubnagar was allotted plot No. 182 in phase-2 of M.I.G.-1 provisionally and tentative cost was fixed at Rs. 10/- per Sq. Yard and the complainant paid a sum of Rs. 2,400/- being the tentative cost of 240 Sq. Yards on 15.10.91. Thereafter the cost of the land was enhanced from Rs. 10/- to Rs. 24/- for development of land, lay-out fees, Court expenditure. It is alleged in the complaint that due to the change in the family affairs, the complainant left Mahabubnagar for Hyderabad and resumed duty in Intelligence Department on 6.1.1982and the change of address was intimated to the society. It was further stated that on 22.9.88 the President of the Society Sri C.K. Narayanachary asked the complainant to pay the difference of cost of the plot of Rs. 1440/- and assured him that a plot will be allotted to him shortly. But on 9.8.89 the complainant received a letter dated 15.6.89 ...

Mohd. Safdar Shareef (Died) Per L.Rs. and ors. Vs. Mohammed Ali (Died) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(1)ALT522

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. The question involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is, whether a Division Bench hearing the Letters Patent Appeal can set aside the Judgment and remand the matter to the learned single Judge to dispose of the appeal which is the subject-matter of the L.P.A. solely for the purpose of enabling the appellants to bring the legal representatives of one of the respondents on record and to dispose of the appeal afresh.2. The facts which give rise to this L.P.A. are briefly stated hereunder. The respondent claiming to be the Mutuvalli of the Masjid-e-Kalam of Musheerabad, Bholakpur village, Bakaram Taluq and Urban District, Hyderabad, filed O.S.No. 31 of 1969 on the file of the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the appellant Nos.l to 4. Since appellant Nos.l to 4 died, appellant Nos. 5 to 11 were brought on record. The plaintiff's case is that the plaint schedule property which is an extent of 3150 sq. yards in Survey No. 247/1 of Bakaram vill...

Vruddhula Kalyana Rama Rao Vs. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT559

B. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. The important points which arise for consideration in this case are : (1) What is a cause of action? When does it arise? Whether any part of the cause of action within the precincts of State of Andhra Pradesh so as to have territorial jurisdiction to issue the writ as sought for? (2) What is the effective date of resignation? Whether it can be accepted before the said effective date preventing the person tendering the resignation from revoking the same before the said effective date? (3) Whether the back wages can be granted if points 1 and 2 are answered in affirmative? 2. The facts briefly stated are thus : The petitioner who was first appointed as Legal Officer, Grade-B in the Legal Department of Reserve Bank of India, Bombay, was sent on deputation to erstwhile Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation, Bombay, during March, 1982 and worked there till 11th July 1982. From 12th July, 1982, he became employee of the 1st respondent-Bank, which was c...

Chelikam Rajamma Vs. Padileti Venkataswami Reddy and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT154

P. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. Although this Letter Patent Appeal is from an interlocutory order passed by a learned single Judge granting interim stay of appointment of receiver made in I. A.No. 182 of 1990 in O.S.No. 49 of 1990 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Gudur subject to the condition of defendants 1 to 3 depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- per annum from the date of filing of the said LA. till the disposal of C.M.A.No. 1465 of 1992 preferred by the defendants, the learned counsel for both sides agreed to argue the main C.M.A, itself. Accordingly, we have heard the learned counsel for both sides and this judgment will dispose of the C.M. A. itself. The parties in this appeal are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit O.S.No. 49 of 1990.2. Chelikam Rajamma, the plaintiff (respondent in the C.M.A.,) instituted the suit OS. No. 3 of 1990 for partition of the plaint schedule property into four shares and for allotment of one share to her and for*future profits.3. The fir...

T.S. Prabhakar Vs. A.N.L. Narasimha Rao and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. One T.S. Prabhakar is the appellant in this appeal. The first respondent herein filed a complaint initially against one Smt. T. Usha. It was alleged in the complaint that Smt. T. Usha is running a consumer goods scheme. The complainant joined as a member and according to the terms of the scheme, he has paid at the rate of Rs. 100.00 (One hundred only) per month for thirty (30) months, but Smt. T. Usha failed to deliver the washing machine. When the complainant raised hue and cry, Mr. T.S. Prabhakar, husband of Smt. T. Usha gave a cheque for Rs. 3,000.00 which also bounced. Initially, relief was claimed against Smt. T. Usha only and subsequently, Mr. T. Prabhakar was added as party. 2. In answer to the complaint, Mr. T.S. Prabhakar mentioned that he has issued a cheque for repayment of the money he owes to the complainant and not towards the value of the washing machine. Two preliminary issues were framed i.e., (i) Whether the complaint is maintainabl...

M/S. Difcos, Investment Consultant Vs. Capt. R.V.S. Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The opposite party in C.D. No. 399/92 in the District Forum, Hyderabad is the appellant herein. The respondent-complainant filed the above Consumer Dispute against M/s Difcos, Investment Consultant, Hyderabad the opposite party for compensation of Rs. 67,000/- with interest at 12% p.a. from 28.3.1992. 2. The case of the complainant is that on 14.3.1992 he placed an order with the opposite party, a share consultant, for purchase of 500 shares of Andhra Cement at the rate of Rs. 36.00 per share and 100 shares of Essar Gujarat at the rate of Rs. 145/- per share. On the same day, the opposite party gave Purchase Advice No. 555 informing the complainant that Difcos bought as ordered by the complainant and on the complainants account 500 shares of Andhra Cement at Rs. 36/- and 100 shares of Essar Gujarat at 145/- and the amount was received by way of adjustment. According to the prevailing practice, when ever shares are purchased by the share consultant in...