Andhra Pradesh Court March 1993 Judgments

Dola Alias Kummari Venkata Rao Vs. State

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(1)ALT(Cri)571; 1993CriLJ3065

G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the sole accused in S.C. No. 35 of 1991, on the file of the Sessions Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, chellenging his conviction for the offence under S. 302, IPC under two counts and sentence of imprisonment for life under each count and the sentences to run concurrently. The above convictions and sentences were imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Godavari at Eluru by his judgment dated 7-11-1991. 2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows :- The accused originally belonged to Kotha Punaturu of Srikakulam District. About 12 years back he left his native place and came away to Bhimavaram and was doing agricultural cooli work. About 10 years back after he settled down at Bhimavaram he developed illicit intimacy with one Kamalamma (P.W. 1), a resident of Mahadevapatnam and they lived together as husband and wife for about 8 years. They have also constructed a house at Mahadevapatnam. They begot two boys, who ar...

Cheni Chenchaiah Vs. Shaik Ali Saheb and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1993AP292; 1993(2)ALT517

ORDER1. The petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 264 of 1987 on the file of the District Munsif, Sullurpet. He filed the suit for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession of the suit premises. He has filed an application in LA. No. 286 of 1987 along with the suit for the grant of temporary injunction in which an ex parte temporary injunction was granted. But on 18-4-1988 the Court dismissed the petition I.A. No. 286 of 1987 for temporary injunction, on the ground that though the plaintiff is in possession of the suit premises, he failed to prove that he is the owner of the premises. The plaintiff-petitioner preferred an appeal C.M.A. No. 22 of 1988 before the Vacation Civil Judge i.e., the Additional District Judge,' Nellore, on 3-5-1988. Along with the appeal he has filed an application I.A. No. 248 of 1988 for grant of temporary injunction and another application LA. No. 249 of 1988 for the appointment o...

Director/Company Secretary, I.C.i. India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Inspector, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT(Cri)606; 1993CriLJ3523

ORDER1. This petition is filed under S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the criminal prosecution launched against the petitioners in S.T.C. No. 135 of 1992 on the file of the I Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Warangal. 2. The prosecution is launched for the violation of the provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976, and the rules of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977. Concisely the case is that the commodity in question i.e., Tenormin Eles tablets with a composition of Atonolal is being packed with fourteen tablets instead of multiples of five as contemplated under Schedule-VI which is appended to Rule 13(5) of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977. Sub-Rule (5) of Rule 13 of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977, reads as follows :- '...... When any commodity is packed by number, such number shall be expressed on the package in international form of Indian numerals, and every package intended to b...

D. Ratnasundari Devi and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Urban Land Ceili ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT428

Sivaraman Nair, J.1. Petitioners are purchasers of lands of various extents in Survey Nos.7, 8 and 9 of Saroornagar village, L.B. Nagar Municipality of Ranga Reddy District. They submit that the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, acted beyond his jurisdiction, in Interdicting the registering officers under the Registration Act, from registering documents of sale of properties. It is asserted that some of the lands were purchased long back and they had been in possession as purchasers and had also built houses on them. They submit that by reason of the Circular dt.30-3-1991 issued by the Inspector General of Registration, the registering officer has refused registration of the document, without disclosing any further reasons. Petitioners submit further that the Inspector General of Registration has no power under the Registration Act, to issue a direction to the Sub-Registrars, not to register any particular document in relation to any particular property. Reliance is sought ...

The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ponnuru Satya ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The respondent in this appeal has taken a medi-claim policy from the appellant on 11-9-1989. On 24-10-1989 at Appollo Hospital, Madras she underwent an operation for Incession Hernia and was discharged from the hopsital on 1-11-1989 for the medical expenses incurred for the operation, she made a claim and handed-over the papers and vouchers to the Branch Manager of New India Insurance Company Limited on 10-11-1989. According to her, although her husband went number of times to the Divisional Office of the Company, they have not settled the claim and informed him every-time that the claim was under process. Therefore, the Complainant filed the Consumer Dispute on 30-8-1990 and claimed before the District Forum a sum of Rs. 8,274-00 with interest at 12% per annum for nine months. 2. After receiving the notice of the claim on 4-4-1991 the appellant informed the respondent that they want the case-sheet from the Appollo Hospital, Madras to process her cla...

The Asst. Engineer, Apseb the Chairman, Apseb Hyderabad Vs. A. Narayan ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The respondent in this appeal filed C.D.No. 76/90 in the District Forum, Mahabubnagar, claiming compensation of Rs. 18,000/- being the value of the paddy of 120 bags which the complainant used to get from Ac.3.00every year and for costs. 2. The case of the complainant is that he owns Ac.5.00 of land in S.No. 105 in Bureddipalle village, Jadgherla Mandal. He got electricity service connection to the well situated in the said survey number, which was fitted with 5 H.P. motor to draw water. He transplanted paddy crop in three acres on 2.6.90. On 13.6.90, the transformer through which the power supply was given to the complainant was burnt. On 14.6.90, Neelaiah came to the village and took away the above said transformer with a plea to replace it. The helper demanded Rs. 700/- to get the transformer replaced within twenty four hours. As the complainant and the other villagers failed to pay the amount, the transformer was not replaced till 26.6.90. For wa...

Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, M.C.H., Unit Ii Vs. B. Ana ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT169

ORDERP. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. In this revision petition, a short but a ticklish question that arose for consideration is, whether the claimants are entitled to interest on the amount of 12% percentum on the market value as provided under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called as 'the Act').2. The respondents, who are the land owners, filed an application in I.A.No. 803/90 in O.P.No. 651/87 before the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to review the decree passed in the said O.P. for including interest on the solatium awarded therein as well as 12% additional market value from the date of notification under Section 34 of the Act.3. In this case, draft notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published on 28-5-1981. Award was passed on 23-09-1986 fixing the market value at Rs. 28/- per square ward. Dissatisfied with the said Award, the claimants filed O.P.No. 657/87 before the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, who enhanced ...

Savani Transport Ltd. and Others Vs. M/S. Nirup Syncrome Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The opposite parties in C.D. No. 303/92 before the District Forum, Warangal are the appellants. 2. The respondent herein filed complaint in C.D. No. 303/92 seeking a direction to the opposite parties to deliver three (3) bags of Mata Amino Acetanilide (hereinafter called M.A.A.) or its value and damages. 3. It is alleged in the complaint that the complainant is a manufacturer of dyesiri his factory at Waddepalli. For its business, (37) bags of M.A.A. were purchased at Gujarat for Rs. 2,46,980.00 and booked with the second opposite party on 24.12.1991 for a consideration of freight charges of Rs. 1,372.00. But the first opposite party, which is a branch of third opposite party at Warangal, delivered only (34) bags. On being asked about short delivery, the first opposite party promised that efforts would be made to trace the missing three (3) bags and they would be delivered shortly. 4. On 1.2.1992 the first opposite party acknowledged the short delive...

The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Zaheerabad and Another Vs. P. Surender

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. A complaint was filed by the respondent herein as C.D. No. 97/1991 before the District Forum claiming a sum of Rs. 31,950/- being the value of the sarees and other items of clothing lost by him while travelling in the bus from Jubilee bus-station to Beedar. According to the complainant when the bus reached Zaheerabad bus stand, it stopped in front of the workshop. According to the complainant, he and his wife along with other passengers got down from the bus. According to him, the conductor informed him that the luggage can be kept in the bus and the bus would come after filling up of the oil. Thereafter the complainant and his wife waited at the bus-point for five minutes and as the bus did not return, he went into the workshop and made enquiries. He was informed that the bus had already left and was advised to check up at the bus-point. He also enquired with the controller and was informed that the bus already left. Although he requested the contro...

M/S. Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Governmen ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1993AP278

ORDER1. This writ petition was filed seeking declaration that the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of Interest Free Sales Tax Loan under the Scheme introduced by the first respondent in G.O.Ms. No. 224, Industries and Commerce Department, dated 9-3-1976 by holding that the provisions of A.P. Interest Free Sales Tax Loans for Industries (Imposition of Ceiling) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') does not affect the rights of the petitioner to claim the above mentioned incentive.2. The writ petition was filed on the basis of the following facts alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 3. The petitioner, which is a Public Limited Company having its registered Office at Adoni, is engaged in the business of manufacture of Caustic Soda and other allied products. It was set up at Gandiparla Village, Kurnool District, which is an industrially backward area. The unit is established at a total cost of Rs. 30 (thirty) crores with the colloboration of an ...