Andhra Pradesh Court November 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rallabandi Sakuntala Vs. Varanasi Jagannadha Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT530
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Court below refusing police protection. The plaintiff is the petitioner who has laid a suit for declaration and consequential injunction against the defendant-1st respondent. Pending disposal of the suit, temporary injunction was sought for and that was granted in I.A. No. 1385 of 1990. As there was interference by the defendant in spite of the injunction order, oh 17-9-1991, the petitioner had earlier filed W.P. No. 14250 of 1991 in this Court seeking orders for police protection. A Division Bench of this Court has disposed of the said Writ Petition on 30-10-1991 with a direction to the Court below to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 C.P.C. seeking police protection and also dispose of I.A. No. 1385 of 1990 on merits expeditiously. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed I.A. No. 1139 of 1991 before the Court below for granting police protection to implemen...
Akula Satyavathi Vs. P.N. Vasantha
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT525
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the Court below dismissing the suit recording the compromise entered into by the plaintiff and the defendant.2. The plaintiff is the revision petitioner who has instituted the suit against the defendant (respondent herein) for recovery of possession and damages. While the written statement was filed, issues were settled and the suit was heading for trial, at that time, the parties invoked the intervention of P.W.2, a mediator, for settling the matter. Ex.X-1 was executed by both the plaintiff and the defendant in that regard. Pursuant to this, possession of the suit premises was handed over by the defendant to the plaintiff and also an amount of Rs. 5,000/- was said to be paid as against claim the damages of Rs. 60,000/- After Ex.X-1 was acted upon and after taking delivery of possession, the revision petitioner addressed a letter (Ex.A-1 signed by the plaintiff) to the District Educational Officer, K...
Pattem Gangi Reddy and ors. Vs. Pattem Subba Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT536
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Court below in admitting two documents and marking them as Exs.A-1 and A-2. Objection was raised when the same were sought to be marked as exhibits. The objection was that the documents are not agreements to sell as projected by the plaintiff, but they are outright sale deeds and as they are neither stamped nor registered in accordance with law, they are inadmissible in evidence. Repelling the contentions of the defendants, who are the revision petitioners, the Court below has held that the documents filed are agreements to sell as they are titled as 'Kararunamas'. No doubt, 'Kararunamas' (agreements) are admissible in evidence as they are not compulsorily registrable. Of course again, there is a distinction as to whether the agreement is simpliciter without delivery of possession or with delivery of possession as the same has got significance for the documents executed on or after 16-8-198...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vijayawada Branch Rep. by Its Branch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT105
Dasaradha Rama Reddy, J.1. These 24 appeals are filed by the Oriental Insurance Company against the common order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khammam, awarding compensation to the various respondents ranging from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 7,500/- with interest at 12% per annum. All O.Ps. arise out of the accident that took place on 31-8-1987 involving the lorry bearing No. ADB 1765 and were filed before 1-7-1989. These 24 persons who were among 70 agricultural coolies travelling in that lorry, sustained grievous and multiple injuries in the accident that took place as a result of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry.2. The Tribunal by its common Award dated 6-4-1990 held that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the lorry driver and awarded compensation against the owner and driver of the lorry and the Insurance Company. Against this order, the Insurance Company filed appeals on 5-10-1990.3. A preliminary objection was taken by th...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P. Mariyamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1993
Reported in: 1994ACJ1219
D. Rama Reddy, J.1. These 24 appeals are filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the common order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khammam, awarding compensation to the various respondents ranging from Rs. 2,000/- to Rs. 7,500/- with interest at 12 per cent per annum. All O.Ps. arise out of the accident that took place on 31.8.1987 involving the lorry bearing No. ADB 1765 and were filed before 1.7.1989. These 24 persons who were among 70 agricultural coolies travelling in that lorry sustained grievous and multiple injuries in the accident that took place as a result of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry.2. The Tribunal by its common award dated 6.4.1990 held that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the lorry driver and awarded compensation against the owner and driver of the lorry and the insurance company. Against this order, the insurance company filed appeals on 5.10.1990.3. A preliminary objection was taken by t...
Dr. Vijaya Raghava Rao, B.N. Tutor in Cardiology, Gandhi Medical Colle ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT630
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner. Dr. Vijaya Raghava Rao, B.N., Tutor in Cardiology, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad for issue of a writ of mandamus declaring the condition of study of residence for a particular period of consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which the candidates appear or first appear in the relevant qualifying examination with reference to the definition of the 'Local Candidate' in Para 4 of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order 1974 and the consequential Government orders as illegal and discriminatory among the people belonging to particular part of the State of Andhra Pradesh being in violation of Article 371D(i) and also being hit by Article 14 of the Constitution of India; and consequently declaring the admission in the Super Speciality Course of Cardiology for 1992-93 given by respondent No. 3 in Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad as illegal and directing respondents 2 and...
Sri Kotla Vijayabhaskara Reddy and ors. Vs. Smt. Renuka Choudary
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-02-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT568
ORDERP.L.N. Sharma, J.1. Application No. 356 of 1993 has been filed by the elected candidate (first respondent in the election petititon) for dismissing the election petition in limine on several grounds. Application Nos. 408 of 1993 and 531 of 1993 have been filed by the learned Advocate General and Sri Innaiah Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Central Government for striking of the names of their respective clients viz., respondents 10 to 12 and 15 and 9th respondent from the array of parties in the Election Petition. Relevant facts are as follows:Election Petition No. 1 of 1993 has been filed by one of the defeated candidates, in addition to claiming a declaration that the election of the first respondent from 184 Panyam Assembly Constituency to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly was void, also claims a further declaration that the election petitioner as having been duly elected to the Andhra Pradesh Assembly from the said Constituency.2. An election notification was issued b...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›