Andhra Pradesh Court October 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
St. Anthony's Educational Society, (No. 214/1988) rep. by Its Presiden ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT561
1. This reference raises important questions relating to the practice and procedure to be followed in a case where a learned single Judge of this Court either makes an order referring the case to a Division Bench or without any order of reference merely directs that a case listed before him be posted before a particular Bench of one Judge or two Judges as the case may be, without a direction to the Registry of the High Court to place the papers before the Chief Justice for passing appropriate orders as to the posting of the case. As rightly pointed out by the Division Bench which has referred this matter to the Full Bench, it is desirable and necessary in such cases to follow a uniform procedure consistent with the well established conventions and practice recognized by the Supreme Court and the High Courts.2. The reference arises out of an order passed by a learned Judge directing that the two writ petitions listed before him shall be posted before a Division Bench hearing a particula...
The Depot Manager, Apsrtc Bhadrachalam Depot and anr. Vs. Ponaganti Ap ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT735
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the APSRTC (respondents) challenging the judgment dated 2-8-1988 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Khammam in MATOP No. 183 of 1987 on his file, awarding a total compensation of Rs. 72,600/- for the death of the deceased in a road accident on 23-5-1987 on account of the rash and negligent driving of the bus AAZ 3759 driven by the 2nd respondent before the lower tribunal.2. So far as the finding with regard to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle is concerned, the Lower Tribunal considered the evidence of P.W.I and Exs.A-1 to A-3, and held that the accident occurred on account of the rash and negligent driving of the bus by its driver, the first respondent. On an independent assessment of the evidence by me also, I find that the accident was the result of the rash and negligent driving of the bus by the 1st respondent.3. As regards the compensation, the learned Standing Counsel for the APSRTC vehemently conte...
Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes Co-operative Finance Corporation, Hyde ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT527; 1993(3)ALT527; [1994(68)FLR1038]
ORDERA. Lakshmana Rao, A.C.J. 1. This writ appeal arises out of the order, dated 21-1-1993, allowing Writ Petition No. 352 of 1993, following the judgment, dated 20-2-1991 in Writ Appeal No. 723 of 1989. The writ petitioner is the respondent in this writ appeal. He passed B. Com. He was appointed as Section Writer on daily-wage basis on 7-5-1986. At the time of appointment, he was paid at the rate of Rs. 18/- per day. From time to time, the daily-wage was enhanced. It is stated that, at present, he is being paid at the rate of Rs. 35 per day. There is no dispute that eversince 7-5-1986 he has been continued in service without any break. As on today, he has completed seven years and five months of service. As his services were not regularised and he was not being paid salary on par with regular employees doing similar work, he filed Writ Petition No. 352 of 1993, seeking writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Section Writer/Junior As...
Sri Venkateswara Engineering Contractors Rep. by Its Managing Partner ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT347
P. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.C.M.A.No. 1532 of 1992:-1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the decree and judgment in O.S.No. 1 of 1992 dated September 22,1992 on the file of the District Judge's Court, Karimnagar.2. The appellant filed originally - O.S.No. 93 of 1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Karimnagar which was transferred and renumbered as O.S.No. 1 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge's Court, Karimnagar. The suit was filed under Sections 8, 20 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, to direct the defendants to file the arbitration agreement dated 30-12-1988; and to appoint one of the persons from the panel of arbitrators submitted by him as arbitrator and for other reliefs. As the suit was dismissed, the plaintiff filed this appeal.C.M.A.No. 1533 of 1992:-3. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No. 2 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge's Court Karimnagar (O.S.No. 94 of 1991 on the file of the Sub...
Shaik Mastanamma Vs. Kadiyala Gopalaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT617
ORDERBhaskar Rao, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 64 of 1992 on the file of the subordinate Judge's Court, Nellore, preferred this revision questioning the order dated 25-3-1992 ordering that a simple money suit only is maintainable and therefore to register the suit filed by the plaintiff accordingly.2. The averments in the said suit were that the defendant borrowed Rs. 15,000/ - on 16-5-1991, Rs. 15,000/- on 20-5-1991 and another sum of Rs. 50,000/- on 16-12-1991 from the plaintiff for his necessities and executed three pronotes. The plaintiff while leading the sum of Rs. 50,000/- on 16-12-1991 insisted for security and the defendant delivered the titled deeds relating to the suit schedule property to the plaintiff with the intention of creating security for repayment of the total amount due under the promissory notes. As the defendant failed to repay the amounts as agreed, the suit is filed for directing the defendant to deposit the amount due and if the defendant fails to deposit, t...
J. Hemalatha and ors. Vs. S. Nagender,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT553
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. Alleging that the deceased, J. Vijayakumar, aged 34 years, working as Senior Assistant in Coromandal Fertilisers, Hyderabad, who is the husband of the 1st petitioner, father of petitioners 2 and 3 and son of petitioners 4 and 5, died in a motor accident on 27-5-1988 at about 9-45 p.m. on the tank bound in Hyderabad city, due to the hit of the A.P.S.R.T.C bus bearing registration No. AAZ 4216, which was driven by the 1st respondent in a rash and negligent driving, the petitioners filed O.P.No. 504 of 1988, on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad claiming a total compensation of Rs. 5,71, 812-29. The lower tribunal having found that there was contributory negligence on the part of the deceased also and having fixed the negligence on the part of the deceased and the driver of the bus in the ratio of 1:3 and after considering the earning capacity of the deceased, ultimately granted a total compensation of Rs. 1,95,000/-. Having ...
Official Liquidator Vs. Kolli Vengaiah Naidu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT458; [1995]84CompCas951(AP)
Parvatha Rao, J. 1. This company application is filed under sub-sections (5) and (5A) of section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for summoning the respondent herein, i.e., Kolli Vengaiah Naidu and to punish him under sub-section (5) of section 454 of the Act for non-compliance with the requirements of section 454 of the Act and to direct him to file forthwith the statement of affairs as required by sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of section 454 of the Act. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of this company application, it is stated that this court passed a winding up order dated September 8, 1989, in Company Petition No. 28 of 1987 directing the winding up of Weber Electric Private Limited and that the official liquidator was appointed as the liquidator of the company under section 449 of the Act. It is further stated that the official liquidator issued notice to the respondent herein on November 30, 1989, to submit the statement of affairs of the ...
The Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. K ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT542; [1997]89CompCas672(AP); 1994CriLJ797
ORDER1. This Company Application is filed under sub-sections (5) and (5-A) of Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for summoning the respondent herein i.e., Koganti Krishna Kumar and to punish him under sub-section (5) of Section 454 of the Act for non-compliance of the requirements of Section 454 of the Act and to direct him to file forthwith the statement of affairs as required by sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 454 of the Act. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of the Company Application, it is stated that this Court passed winding up order on 17-11-1989 in Company Petition No. 30 of 1985 directing the winding up of Chlorate India Limited and that the Official Liquidator has become the Liquidator of the Company under section 449 of the Act. It is further stated that notice was issued under sections 454 and 456 of the Act to the respondent herein on 16-1-1990 to submit the statement of affairs and also to deliver possession of the a...
Smt. Kasibhotla Srirani Vs. Sri Kasibhotla Madhava Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT713
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment passed in Original. Petition No. 19 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Gudivada. By his judgment dated February 10, 1992, the learned Subordinate' judge allowed the Original Petition filed by the respondent - husband granting a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between the appellant-wife and the respondent - husband. Aggrieved by that, the appellant-wife preferred this appeal.2. The respondent-husband in his petition filed under Section 13(1) (1a) and (1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleges that the marriage between the respondent and the appellant-wife took place on April 24, 1980 at Pamarru; that the appellant joined the respondent at Gannavaram and she lived with him till she was taken to Pamarru by her father; that the appellant ever since the marriage was showing dislike towards him and openly declaring that the marriage was against her will and pleasure...
Laxmi and ors. Vs. Nakka Narayan Goud and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-1993
Reported in: 1994CriLJ565; I(1994)DMC224
ORDER1. This Criminal Revision rather poses an important question as to whether the limitation of one year under the 1st proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 125, Cr.P.C. is applicable to the minors for enforcing the order of maintenance passed in their favour. 2. Four minor children, two male and two female, represented by their mother are the petitioners herein. The 1st respondent is their father. On the ground that the 1st respondent neglected the wife and the children, the wife on her behalf and also as a guardian of the minor children initiated proceedings in M.C. No. 9 of 1985 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnagar for the grant of maintenance to her and her minor children. The order of maintenance sought for was granted but on revision by the 1st respondent to the Court of Sessions, the latter while setting aside the maintenance order in favour of the wife, sustained the order of maintenance granted in favour of the petitioners. The order of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »