Andhra Pradesh Court January 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Sr. Y. Philomena Vs. St. Ann's Convent and Ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-1993
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT283
ORDERN.D. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner herein filed a suit O.S.4030/1992 in the Court of the 6th Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for certain reliefs. In that she had filed two petitions LA. Nos. 1603 and 1604 of 1992 for grant of temporary injunctions. The learned 6th Assistant Judge has granted an interim injunction in LA. 1603/92. Against that an appeal C.M.A.318/92 is filed before the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2.The respondents filed a suitO.S.1209/1992 in the Court of the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the plaintiff. They have filed a petition O.P.1076/1992 in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court to transfer the suit O.S.4030/1992 in the court of the 6th Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to the 4th Addl. Judge's Court to be tried along with O.S.1209/92. In that they have filed an application I.A.2498/1992 for stay of proceedings in the court of the 6th Assistant Judge pending disposal of the O.P. The learned Chief j...
S. Hanumantha Rao and ors. Vs. F.C.i. Rep. by Its Chairman and Managin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-1993
Reported in: 1993(2)ALT512
ORDEREswara Prasad, J.1. The petitioners are the employees of the respondent-Food Corporation of India. Earlier, they worked in Food Department of the Central Government. By virtue of the provisions of Section 12-A of the Food Corporations Act, 1964, the services of the petitioners stood transferred to the respondent-Corporation.2. Options were called for from the petitioner in the year 1973, requiring them to opt either to the General Provident Fund (in short G.P.F.) scheme applicable to the Central Government Employees or to the Contributory Provident Fund (in short C.P.F) scheme of the respondent-Corporation. The petitioners submitted their options retaining the G.P.F. scheme of the Central Government and the respondent-Corporation continued the petitioner to subscribe for G.P.F. scheme. Subsequently, the Food Corporations Act was amended with effect from 31-12-1976, as a result of which, fresh options were required from the employees of the Corporation including the petitioners to ...
Chitti Prasada Rao and ors. Vs. Chitti Asiripolamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1993
Reported in: I(1994)DMC253
B. Subhashan Reddy, J.This revision case arose out of the maintenance proceedings initiated by the mother i.e., the 1st respondent herein against her three sons invoking the provisions contained under Section 125 Cr. P.C. The maintenance is claimed on the ground that she has no means to maintain herself and that her sons i.e., the petitioners 1 to 3 herein neglected her. M.C. No. 20 of 1992 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajam filed for maintenance by the mother was ordered on 14.9.1992. Under the said order an amount of Rs. 500/- was ordered to be paid, as sought for, towards maintenance.1. The learned Counsel for the petitioners contends that the said order is an ex parte order without notice to the respondents in M.C. who are the revision petitioners herein. The impugned order shows that no notice was issued to the respondents and the order of maintenance, the relevant portion of which is as follows :'The statement of the petitioner prima facie discloses the dir...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›