Andhra Pradesh Court September 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Miss. D. Sridevi Vs. the A.P. Agricultural University and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP123
ORDER1. The writ petitioner Miss D. Sridevi is a candidate who was denied admission to the Ph.D. Course in Entomology in the first respondent-University. In the M.Sc. (Ag) Entomology she secured OGPA 9.07 and no other candidate in the three agricultural colleges secured a higher rank than her. In addition to that, in the selection for the Ph.D. Course with Entomology as major field, she was Rank No. 1 having secured 158.70 marks. When the list of candidates selected for admission was announced on 20th March, 1992, she found that the two seats meant for Ph.D. (Entomology) were allotted to respondent No. 3, a BC-B candidate who secured only 151.55 marks and to respondent No. 4, a S.C. candidate who secured only 139.65 marks. Aggrieved by the denial of admission, she has come forward with this writ petition. In this writ petition, she does not challenge the validity of G.O.Ms. No. 158, Education(c) Department dated 20th February, 1982, under which the rule of reservation was made applicab...
Smt. B. Shankaramma and anr. Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Its Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT130
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. First petitioner is the mother of the 2nd petitioner, who is adolescent convict undergoing imprisonment for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, committed by him in the year 1987. It is stated in the affidavit that the 1st petitioner hails from a poor family; her husband died when the 2nd petitioner was hardly two years old. Without the support of the husband, the first petitioner had to face difficulty in bringing up the 2nd petitioner and to provide him proper education. It is further stated that the 2nd petitioner studied upto 6th class only in a primary school at Kothapet and because of poverty, further studies could not be prosecuted by the 2nd petitioner. The family occupation of the petitioners is tapping. In order to augment, the family requirement, the 2nd petitioner was engaged in family occupation i.e., tapping of trees and selling the toddy. It is further stated that the 2nd petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo impri...
M. Bhoopal Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ2494
ORDER1. This Revision is directed against the Judgment of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, dated 9-7-1991 in Crl. A. No. 25/91 confirming the conviction of the petitioner for the offence under Section 304A, I.P.C. and the sentence of R.I. for two years and fine of Rs. 1,000/- imposed by the trial Court in C.C. No. 342/89 on the file of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 2. The case of the prosecution is that P.Ws. 1 and 2 and the deceased worked in a construction complex at Adikmet and on 27-4-1989 after completing their work they were returning back to their house on their individual cycles. P.W. 1 was in the front, P.W. 2 in the middle and the deceased was behind P.W. 2. When they were passing through Ramnagar Gundu, one R.T.C. bus AEZ 5482, driven by the accused came from behind with high speed and in a rash and negligent manner and the left bumper of the bus hit the cycle of the deceased. Due to the impact the deceased fell down from the cycle and the lef...
Matha Gavarayya and Others Vs. the District Collector, E.G. Dist. and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP103
ORDER1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not assigning the land situated in Sy.Nos.882, 964 to 967 of Bellampudi village, P. Gannavaram Mandal East Goda-vari District, an extent of Acs. 48.00 cms., as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to assign the land to the petitioners. The lands in question are admittedly Lanka lands.2. Ms. Nanda, appearing for the Government Pleader for Revenue reiterates that since the above lands are Lanka lands, the rules prohibit the assignment of the said lands. The learned counsel further contends that since the lands are Government lands, the Government can exercise its rights in a manner it deems fit either to lease it out or assign in accordance with the governmental guidelines framed in that regard. She further argues, that when the lands are admittedly Government lands and when the petitioners admit that they had occupied the lands and that too without any authority o...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. G. Seshagiri Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1992
Reported in: [1995]213ITR304(AP)
Syed Shah Mohd. Quadri, J.1. At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh, the following questions of law are referred to this court for its opinion : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in law in annulling the Commissioner of Income-tax's order under section 263 (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that there was no transfer of interest by the assessee to the other partners in the firm within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?' 2. There was a partnership under the name and style of Messrs. White Field Industrial Corporation, Bangalore (for short, 'White Field'). It purchased certain land in Seghalli, Bidarahalli, Hebli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore district, from Messrs. Krishna Mining Company, Goginenipuram. Gudur, Nellore district, under a registered sale deed dated May 15, 1972. Out of the four par...
Sunkara Durga Raja Babu Chowdary Vs. the Inspector of Police, Crime In ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT463
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. This is a petition filed for writ of Mandamus alleging that the petitioner is the owner of the lorry bearing No. ATR 4237 having a National permit; that the said lorry was hired by the 3rd respondent who is a transport contractor for Brooke Bond India Limited; that while booking a consignment of Tea from Gauhati to Bangalore on 28-9-90, the 3rd respondent has not taken insurance policy though his firm has collected the Insurance premium from Brooke bond India Limited; that when the lorry reached Rajanagaram, it had accidentally caught fire destroying the lorry as well as the goods; that the 3rd respondent won over the Police machinery at Rajanagaram and got a false case foisted against him under Section 407 read with 120B of Indian Penal Code which is pending before the III Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry as CC. No. 52 of 1990; that the 3rd respondent came to Vijayawada along with the police and began coercing the petitioner to...
S. Sarat Babu Chowdary Vs. Inspector of Police, Crime Investigation Ag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT454
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. The writ petitioner is a journalist. It is alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the 3rd respondent bore grudge against the petitioner for the reason that he was instrumental in getting anticipatory bail to his younger brother, by name Durgarajababu Chowdhary; that on 24-1-1991 during the early hours, the 1st respondent along with staff came to his house at Gudivada and forcibly took him by car to Vijayawada; that he was paraded in the streets of Vijayawada with handcuffs; that the 1st respondent did not follow the mandatory procedure prescribed by Section 50 of Criminal Procedure Code; that he was produced before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, who has remanded him to Judicial custody till 31-1-1991 with a direction that he should be produced before the Magistrate at Bhivani and that subsequently the learned Magistrate was pleased to grant bail to him in Crl. M.P. No. 6 of 1991 with a condition that h...
G. Chinna Ramalingaiah and Others Vs. Pedda Sunkanna Goud and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP47; 1993(1)ALT140
ORDER1. The question that falls for consideration in this revision petition is :'Whether refusal to permit the petitioners to amend the suit one filed initially for permanent injunction to be converted into a suit for specific performance, is proper or not?'2. Petitioners are the plaintiff who filed O.S. 31/87 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Alampur. The said suit is one for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, who are respondents in this revision petition, from interfering with their peaceful possession over the suit schedule property, which the petitioners-plaintiffs claim to have come into possession by virtue of agreements of sale entered into between the parties as per Exs. A-l to A-4. Along with the suit, LA. No. 266/87 was filed seeking ad interim injunction. The trial Court initially granted ad interim injunction in favour of the petitioners-plaintiffs. Later on, when the respondents-defendants, who entered appearance, filed an elaborate counter inter alia...
Kuna Manikyam Pandu and ors., Chairman and Councillors of Municipaliti ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT279
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. On 6-3-88 elections were held in 25 newly constituted municipalities in the State of Andhra Pradesh for election of Chairmen and Councillors. The Chairmen and Councillors of nine (9) municipalities have filed these writ petitions seeking a declaration that they are entitled to continue in their respective offices till 21-3-1993 or in the alternative a writ of certiorari to quash Sub-section (5) of Section 7 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. There are 108 municipalities in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Section 3(1) of the Act confers power on the State Government by notification in the A.P. Gazette to constitute a local area in the vicinity thereof or to exclude from a municipality any local area comprised therein. Section 5 lays down that there shall be constituted for every municipality a body called the municipal council having authority over the municipality and consisting of such number of councillors as may be notified ...
Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Nawab Fazalyar Jung
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-1992
Reported in: [1995]213ITR223(AP)
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The following questions of law are referred to us for opinion under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in holding that an amount of Rs. 4 lakhs being the fair market value of properties transferred by the assessee to his wife, is not includible in his wealth under section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 2. If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative, whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in omitting to sustain the inclusion of at least Rs. 1,20,000 in the net wealth of the assessee representing the debt due from his wife ?' 2. For the assessment year 1977-78, the assessee paid a sum of Rs. 1,20,000 to this wife, Smt. Basheerunnisa Begum, towards payment of her meher amount. She invested the same and purchased house properties in Kachiguda and Khairatabad. The value of the said properties was included in the net wealth of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »