Andhra Pradesh Court August 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Talari Mala Obulesu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT509
ORDERIyyapu Panduranga Rao, J.1. This application is directed to withdraw S.C. No...../92 from the file of the Court of Special Judge for trial of offences under the S.Cs. and S.Ts. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Chittoor arising out of SC No. 211 /90 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur and to retransfer the same to the Court of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur for disposal, according to law.2. S.C. No. 211 /90 on the file of the Court of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur is a case arising under Cr. No. 44/89 of P.S. Kuderu under Sees. 147, 148,302 r/w Section 149 I.P.C. While the case was pending on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur, a Circular in Roc. No. 2582/50/91 dated 12-2-1992 was issued by the High Court in exercise of the powers under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permitting all the Sessions Judges, Addl. Sessions Judges and Assistant Sessions Judges of the concerned district to transfer the cases filed under the S.Cs. and S.T...
Nuka Kamalamba and ors. Vs. M. Ramaiah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT673
A. Gopal Rao, J.1. This appeal is from the judgment and decree in Original Suit No. 18 of 1984, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Warangal, dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs for a preliminary decree directing partition of plaint schedule estate and allot 0-24 paise share to the plaintiffs, to appoint a Commission to divide the suit estate as per the preliminary decree, to pass a final decree in respect of the shares of the plaintiffs and to put them in separate possession of such shares, for rendition of accounts with effect from May, 1978 by the 1st defendant and for a permanent injunction, restraining the 1st defendant from receiving the rents from the 8th defendant in respect of the suit estate. As plaintiffs 1 and 2 sold away their shares in the partnership subsequent to the institution of the suit, the appeal was preferred by the unsuccessful plaintiffs 3 to 8.2. The 1st defendant was the owner of an extent of Ac. 3-07 guntas of land covered by survey numbers 168...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›