Andhra Pradesh Court August 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Angadi Santhanna and anr. Vs. G. Nagabhushanam and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT487
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. The petitioners herein filed I.A. No. 40 of 1991 in I.P. No. 6 of 1991 under Order 1, Rule 10 C.P.C praying to permit them to come on record as respondents 4 and 5 in the Insolvency Petition. The petitioners stated in the affidavit that I.P. No. 6/91 is filed by respondent No. 1 herein in collusion with respondents 2 to 4, who are the debtors. It is stated that the petitioners are creditors and they filed suits, O.S.Nos. 218/90 and 290/90 against respondent No. 2 to 4 for recovery of certain amount. The trial Court seems to have decreed the suits and E.P. No. 18/91 was filed by one of the decree-holders against the judgment- debtors and some of the items of the properties were sold in auction and were purchased by one of the decree-holders. Likewise, the 1st petitioner also filed E.P. No. 17/91 for sale of certain items of the properties. At that stage, respondent No. 1 filed I.P. No. 6/91 in the Subordinate Judge's Court, Adoni for declaring the judgment-deb...
Gangavarapu Venkata Narasa Reddy Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer Spec ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-1992
Reported in: AIR1994AP2
ORDER1. The petitioner is an agriculturist whose land to an extent of Ac. 3-46 cente situate in Survey No. 289 of Nernur village, Chejerla Mandal, Nellore district along with trees and well was acquired by the Government in the year 1986 for the purpose. of executing the work relating to Kandleru reservoir. The award was supposedly passed on 30-7-1987 awarding a compensation of Rs. 1,65,754/-. As the petitioner was dissatisfied with the award, he filed an application on 12-11-1987 through his advocate seeking for reference to the Civil Court under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. As there was no response, the petitioner caused another legal notice to be sent on 27-7-1991 to the Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Telugu Ganga Project. Even for this there was no response. The petitioner states that he was orally informed in the office of the respondent that the application was filed by him beyond the prescribed period of thirty days and hence the reference was time barred. The...
R. Hanman Singh Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanapet Divisi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT369
ORDERP. Venkata Rama Reddi, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies.2. The petitioner who is a licensee of Fair Price Shop has challenged the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer in his proceedings No.F/2062/1992 dt. 22-5-1992. By that order, the authorisation issued to the petitioner for running the Fair Price Shop No. 1 at Doultabad has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioner has been elected as the President of Doultabad Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society. In other words, the said election has been viewed as a disqualification to remain as a Fair-Price Shop dealer. In this connection a reference was made in the impugned order to G.O.Ms. No. 951, Food & Agriculture, dated 16-5-1988. A perusal of the impugned order shows that no opportunity of submitting an explanation was afforded to the petitioner. It is axiomatic that before passing a statutory order prejudicially affecting the rights of a person, th...
N. Venkateswara Rao Vs. Deputy Commr. of Labour and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT438; (1993)ILLJ795AP
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J. 1. It is distressing to note that the beneficial schemes like the instant one concerning the writ petition, have been grossly misused by the persons who are not eligible under the said schemes, thus depriving the persons who are really entitled thereto. A laudable policy was evolved by the Government to construct the quarters for the industrial workers and after sometime of occupation, to regularise the same on hire-purchase basis. Rules have been framed in that] regard. Rules contemplate allotment of a Quarter to an industrial worker who is actually working on the said date and after some time, enter into an agreement with him to transfer the said quarter to him on hire-purchase basis. No industrial worker was entitled to occupy the quarter unless allotment is made specifically in that regard. Here is a case before me in which the petitioner even though was an industrial worker and was allotted a quarter bearing No. 101 at; Vijayawada, did not occupy the sa...
K. Kamala Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT286
ORDERParvatha Rao, J.1. The petitioner passed the entrance examination in Karnatak Music (Vocal) conducted by the State Board of Technical Education at Vijayawada held in the month of April, 1972 and subsequently she studied and passed B.A. Degree examination from Andhra University with Music as the main subject. The Andhra University had given her a certificate dt. 1-3-1984 certifying that the petitioner had been duly admitted to the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in that University after she was declared to have passed the examination prescribed therefor and it was also mentioned therein that Music was her main subject.2. The petitioner applied for the post of Music Teacher in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Air Force Station, Suryalanka, Bapatla and the 3rd respondent i.e., the Principal of the said Kendriya Vidyalaya appointed her as Music Teacher with effect from 11-1-1985 on temporary and adhoc basis. She was relieved on completion of academic year on 30-4-1985. Subsequently she appeared for int...
G. Ratnam and Others Vs. Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary Law Dept ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP51; 1992(3)ALT289
ORDER1. This writ petition arises under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (herreinaftcr referred to as 'the Act). The draft notification under S. 4(1) of the Act was published in the official Gazette dated 11-7-1984. The case of the petitioner is that the substance of this notification was not published in the locality. But as I could see from the records produced by the learned counsel for the respondents that the substance of notification was published in the office of Collector and the Office of the Tahsildar on 7-8-1984, and in the Grampanchayat, the locality and at the lands on 8-8-1984. Section 6 declaration was published in the gazette dated 5-8-1987. As such, the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri V. Tulasi Reddy that S. 6 declaration was published beyond three years from S. 4(1) notification fails.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner raises another contention that for the period prior to 24-9-1984 and in respect of notification under S. 4(1) the p...
Athiest Society of India, Nalgonda District Branch Vs. Govt. of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: AIR1992AP310
ORDER1. The petitioner-Athiest Society of India, Nalgonda District Branch, prays for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent-Government of Andhra Pradesh, to instruct all the concerned Heads of Departments to prohibit the practice of religious performance of worship al the State functions, such as, during the laying of foundation stones for large, and small projects and inauguration of State buildings or Institutions and exhibiting religious symbols, like Photos or Idols in the State Offices or its subordinate offices.2. The deponent of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, claims to be the Secretary of the Athiest Society of India, Nalgonda District Branch. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent is not following the secular objectives of the State, as enshrined in the Constitution of India and is practically encouraging religious sentiments by permitting performance of rituals, such as, breaking of coconuts, performing poojas and chantin...
Business Manager, Andhra Printers Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-lab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT519; (1993)ILLJ562AP
ORDER1. A preliminary objection raised by the Management of M/s. Andhra Printers Limited with regard to the maintainability of the application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the I.D. Act') filed by a journalist has led to the filing of this writ petition by the Management. The Labour Court over-ruled the preliminary objection and held that Section 17 of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'W.J. Act') does not bar a claim under Section 33-C(2) of the I.D. Act made by a working journalist. 2. The 2nd respondent in the writ petition was the applicant before the Labour Court. He was a part-time Correspondent of Andhra Jyothi daily newspaper at Warangal. The 2nd respondent who was being paid a consolidated salary had claimed before the Labour Court scales of pay, Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, Variable Dearness Allowance, ...
Pally Ramulu and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Secr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT158
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. What is essentially a private dispute between two sets of persons each claiming to be genuine members of a Society registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli, hereinafter called as 'the Registration Act' is sought to be converted into question of public law for issue of a writ of mandamus. The 1st petitioner claims to be the Correspondent of Arya High School, Chaderghat, Hyderabad. The 2nd petitioner is Arya Educational Society, represented by its President one Mr. A. Govind Reddy. The 3rd petitioner is Mr. A. Govind Reddy in his personal capacity. The 2nd petitioner-Society was registered under the Registration Act in the year 1963 and it is claimed that the bye-laws of the Society were also registered with the Registrar of Societies. It is the case of the petitioners that in the general body meeting held on 4-2-1990, certain persons including petitioner No. 1 were elected as office bearers. The names of the m...
Ashok Govind Hardikar Vs. Sri D. Lakshminarayana Rao, Regional Manager ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT630
Sivaraman Nair, J.1. This appeal arises from the Judgment in Writ Petition No. 1769/1989. That Writ Petition was filed by respondents 1 to 3 in this appeal. The other respondents herein are the A.P. State Warehousing Corporation (R. 4) and the State of A.P. represented by its Secretary (Marketing) (R. 5).2. The appellant and respondents 1 to 3 commenced service under the 4th respondent-corporation as Warehouse Managers II. Previous service, if any, rendered by them in the Corporation is not relevant for our present purpose. From Warehouse Manager, Grade-II, all of them were promoted to the next higher post of Warehouse Manager, Grade-I, by order dt. 26-6-74 with effect from 1-7-74. In that order, respondents 1 to 3 were assigned rank numbers 1 to 3 whereas the appellant was ranked as No. 6. Thereafter, respondents 1 to 3 and the appellant were appointed as Regional Managers. The appellant was occupying a corresponding position of Regional Manager in the Head Office. By an order dt. 31-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »