Andhra Pradesh Court August 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hyderabad and Secunderabad Coconut Merchants Association, Represented ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-19-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT256
D. Reddeppa Reddy, J.1. The delicate issue for our decision is whether the present two writ petitions, viz. (1) W.P.No. 16814/1990 for directing the respondents 1,2 and 5 to allot plots to petitioners 2 to 12 in the market yard established under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Act, 1966, in the premises called 'Mahaboob Mansion', Malakpet, Hyderabad, by way of implementing the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 6783/1981, dated 22-4-1991 and by reducing the area of plots in the approved plan, so as to meet the needs of all wholesale traders of Hyderabad city in agricultural produce; and (2) W.P.No. 14261/1991 for declaring the Government Memo No. 1240/ Agrl.VI(l)/80-l, dated 2-5-1980 and the Government Memo No. 1327/ Agrl. VI(l)/80-l, dated 23 5-1980 as illegal and for directing the respondents to cancel the allotment of plots measuring more than 200 square yards etc., are maintainable in the light of - (i) the order dated 1...
P. Ram Reddy Vs. the Shipping Corpn. of India Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-19-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT439
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed by a Senior Advocate for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay Rs. 2,18,600/- (Rupees two lakhs eighteen thousand and six hundred only) together with simple interest at 12% per annum from 1st April, 1966 to the date of payment.2. The claim of the petitioner is that he worked as the Legal Adviser to Messrs Jayanthi Shipping Company (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') for the years 1961 to 1966; that he has been submitting a diary of work done for the company regularly for each year's work done, in. the subsequent year: that the company was usually making payments in the next financial year for the work done in the previous year; that the company was taken over with its assets and liabilities by the respondent; that as such the respondent is bound to pay whatever sum is due to the petitioner from the company; that there was lot of correspondence between the parties; that the petitioner addressed s...
T. Devender and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-19-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT1
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. This judgment will dispose of all the six writ petitions since they raise common questions for decision. When the writ petitions were filed, the petitioners were either Chairmen of Zilla Praja Parishads or Presidents of Mandala Praja Parishads. Except the Chairman of the Rangareddy Zilla Parishad, the term of office of the other petitioners has expired. The challenge in the writ petitions, was originally confined to the legality of (1) G.O.Ms. No. 164, Panchayati Raj and Rural Development Department (Mandals-I) dated 8-3-90 by which a rule was made under Sub-section (1) of Section 92 and Sub-section (6) of Section 28 of the Mandala Praja Parishads, Zilla Praja Parishads and Zilla Abhivrudhi Sameeksha Mandals Act, 1986 (MPP & ZPP Act for short) and (2) G.O.Ms. No. 303, General Administration (Services-A) Department dt. 17-4-90, by which, the District Selection Committee for recruitment to the posts both in Government Departments and Panchayat Raj Bodies in the distri...
M/S. Trinmurthy Constructions Vs. Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi Gadgil
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP95
ORDERG. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. The plaintiff, M/s. Trimurthy Constructions, represented by its Partner, Omprakash Tibre-wala, is the appellant.2. The plaintiff's suit for specific performance of the contract of sale was dismissed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,Hyderabad, by his judgment and decree dated 13th September, 1988, passed in O.S. No. 311of 1983 on his file.3. The case of the plaintiff-firm, in a nutshell, is as follows :-- In the first week of December, 1980 QmprakashTibrewala, (who is examined as P.W. 1 in the lower Court), as a partner of the plaintiff-firm, approached the defendant, Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi Gadgil, D. W. 1 for the purchase of the plaint schedule property for the purpose of developing it in pursuit of the two objectives of the firm of construction of residential and commercial complexes and selling them. The negotiations were followed till 10-12-1980 on which day the defendant agreed orally to sell the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff-f...
Kunisetti Gangi Reddy Vs. Kukkuteswara Swamy Temple Rep. by Its Execut ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT677
ORDERNeeladri Rao, J.1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 90/89 on the file of the District Munsif, Pithapuram, is the Revision Petitioner. The suit was filed for an injunction against respondents 2 to 6 herein restraining them from interfering with the possession of the plaint- schedule property by alleging that he had taken the plaint schedule land on lease from the 1st Respondent herein and that R-2 to R-6 herein have no manner of interest in the property. R-l herein filed I.A.No. 755/89 under Order-I, Rule 10, C.P.C with a prayer that it should be allowed to come on record to contest the suit. The said petition was allowed and it is attacked in this revision petition.2. Admittedly R-1 herein is the owner of the plaint-schedule property. R-1,temple had filed eviction petition as against the revision petitioner herein. The eviction was ordered and the same was confirmed by the appellate court. The revision petitioner herein filed W.P.No. 9636/87 for issual of a direction as againt R-1 temple ...
Sarva Reddy and ors. Vs. the Special Deputy Collector, L.A. Unit Priya ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1992
Reported in: 1993(2)ALT185
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The thirty five petitioners herein, mostly belonging to Scheduled Caste and Back ward Classes, are agriculturists owning very small extents of land, aggregation Ac. 29-00, which was acquired by the Government for a public purpose. The award was passed by the Collector on 25-7-1985. The petitioners were served with notices of the award under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on 25-7-1985. They made written applications on 9-9-1985 under Section 18(1) of the Act requesting the Collector to refer the matter to the Civil Court for determination of the compensation amount. After two years and three months, those applications were rejected on 10-12-1987 on the ground that they were received 'with a delay of five days'. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition was filed.2. At the interlocutory stage, after hearing both sides, a direction was given to the respondent-Special Deputy Collector, to refer the petitions filed ...
Ega Venkaiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT193; 1993CriLJ691
Y. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. These two writ petitions for issue of Habeas Corpus relate to one and the same detenu, W.P. 2225 of 1992 being a taken up case on receipt of a telegram dated 4-2-1992 while the other (W.P. 2216/92) is a regular writ petition filed by the father of the detenu-Srinivasulu. 2. The events that preceded the filing of the writ petition as stated in the affidavit are : The reference to the parties hereunder is made as they are arrayed in W.P. No. 2216/92. On 11-8-1991 the marriage of one Allampati Sudhakara Reddy, a close friend of the present detenu and two others, namely (i) Raja and (ii) Pakam Sudhakar, took place at Jonnawada temple with one Parveen, daughter of the 3rd respondent (Sub-Inspector). While so, hearing that the above three persons attended the marriage, the 3rd respondent along with the 4th respondent and other constables came to the house of the petitioner in the early hours of 30-1-1992 and took away the detenu by using criminal force in a van and from ...
The Pan Merchants' Wholesale Commission Agents' Association, rep. by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1992
Reported in: 1993(2)ALT205
1. In all these writ petitions, the power of the Agricultural Market Committee, Hyderabad to levy and collect market fees from the petitioner herein, the commission agents who carry on business of selling betel leaves as commission agents of the growers in 'Gyan Bagh', Hyderabad, a private market owned by them is questioned.2. The members of the 'Pan Merchants Wholesale Commission Agents Association, 'Hyderabad are licenced commission agents carrying on the trade of selling betel leaves on behalf of the growers in the private market 'Gyan Bagh' situated in Sitarampet, Hyderabad. They plead that the private market 'Gyan Bagh' is owned by them, that they have been carrying on the trade in betel leaves as commission agents in that market from time immemorial and that no facilities whatsoever have been provided so far in that market by the Agricultural Market Committee, Hyderabad. It is further stated that 'Gyan Bagh' has not been so far established as a market proper under Sub-section (3)...
Sri Veera Hanuman Vaddera Labour Contract Co-operative Society Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT446
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. The question that falls for consideration in this writ petition is whether the 1st respondent viz., the Director of Mines and Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, has power under the A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 to extend the time beyond the period stipulated in the confirmation order as per sub-rule (2) of Rule 9-G. In order to appreciate this proposition, it is necessary to state few facts leading to the filing of this writ petition.2. The petitioner is a Vaddera Labour Contract Co-operative Society, Aler, Nalgonda District, consisting majority of its members from weaker sections. It is stated that this society is registered under the provisions of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. It is also stated that sand quarries throughout the State of Andhra Pradesh are put to auction and the successful bidder is given the leasehold rights to the area earmarked. Prior to the issuance of G.O.Ms. No. 3, Industries & Commerce (M-IV) Dep...
Agarwal Traders Represented by Gulshan Kumar Agarwal and anr. Vs. Magn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT435
ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad has jurisdiction to entertaint the suit - O.S. No. 2163 of 1987 - filed by the respondent herein for recovery of certain amounts from the petitioners, who are defendants therein2. The respondent-plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 17 lakhs due from the petitioners-defendants towards the value of the goods supplied by the respondent-plaintiff. The petitioners-defendants filed a written statement denying their liability. A preliminary objection was raised in the written statement as to the territorial jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit. The trial Court framed a preliminary issue relating to territorial jurisdiction as under:'Whether this Court has territorial jurisdiction to try the suit?'The petitioners herein filed I.A. No. 95 of 1988 on 30-6-1988 under Order 14, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code praying the t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »