Andhra Pradesh Court July 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Central Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT88
D.J. Jagannadha Raju, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the respondent in Writ Petition No. 5816 of 1984. The writ petition has been filed by the employees working in the Agricultural Development Banks in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioners claim two reliefs. The first relief is to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondentbank, namely, Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Central Agricultural Development Bank (hereinafter called 'the Central Bank' for brevity sake) to continue to pay bonus to all the centralised cadre employees at the same rate at which their employees in the Head Office and Regional Offices were paid during the years 1981-82,1982-83 and for all subsequent years. The second relief prayed for is for a declaration that Annexure 'A' i.e., circular letter No. 2/F'A/ACCI/84-85 dated 4th January, 1985 of the respondent-bank is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The learned single judge, by judgment dated 6th September, ...
i. Venkata Ramana Vs. K. Sanyasi Naidu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT212; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)618
1. This appeal arisen from the judgment in Writ Petition No. 6908/90. The appellant was elected as the Sarpanch of Pothureddipalam Gram Panchayat in the election conducted on 12-3-1988. Respondents 1 and 2 were the unsuccessful candidates. First respondent filed O.P. No. 19/88 challenging the election of the appellant before the District Munsif, Yellamanchilli. Case of the first respondent was that the appellant was not qualified to be elected as sarpanch because he was disqualified in terms of Section 17 of the A.P. Gram Panchayats Act, 1964 in that he was an employee of Etikoppaka Co-operative Sugar Factory. The Election Tribunal, namely, the District Munsif, Yellamanchili after considering the evidence led before him found that the appellant being an employee of Etikoppaka Co-operative Sugar Factory, was disqualified under Section 17(1) of the A.P. Gram Panchayats Act. The Tribunal, therefore, set aside the election of the appellant.2. Appellant filed Writ Petition No. 6908/90 chall...
The Nalgonda Telugu Baptist Churches Self-supporting Field Association ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT739
Neeladri Rao, J.1. Defendant No. 2 in O.S. No. 98/83 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Nalgonda, is the appellant herein. The suit was filed by A.P. State Electricity Board as an interpleader suit. It was specifically averred in the plaint that they were inducted into possession as tenant by D-1. The latter in the written statement had also averred that the plaintiff was inducted by them into the plaint schedule property as a tenant. D-2 also inter alia contended that they inducted the plaintiff into possession.2. Even earlier to the above suit, D-1 filed O.P. No. 23/81 on the file of the District Munsif, Nalgonda for eviction of the plaintiff.3. The proceedings initiated under the A.P. Escheats and Bona Vacantia Act, 1974 (Act 35/74) were registered as OP 24/82. The rival claimants in regard to the properties covered by the said O.P. are D-1 and D-2 herein. By order dt. 7-3-86 in O.P. No. 24/82 it was held that D-1 herein is entitled to manage the properties of the mission...
N. Jayaraju and anr. Vs. K.C. Penchalaiah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1992CriLJ4077
ORDER1. This Court by an order dated 31-1-1992 in W.P. M.P. No. 1176 of 1992 in W.P. No. 1037 of 1992 directed that the District Education Officer, Krishna, shall not pass any further orders in regard to the change in the Correspondentships of the Schools run and managed by Convenor, Education Committee, CBCNC, West Vuyyuru fields, pending further orders on the writ petition. 2. This contempt case has been filed on the allegation that contrary to the said direction, the District Educational Officer passed an order on 14-4-1992 approving the nomination of Correspondents made by the Convenor, Education Committee, CBCNC. 3. It has been brought to my notice by the learned Govt. Pleader for Education that subsequent to the order passed in W.P.M.P. No. 1176/92, some of the respondents in the said W.P.M.P. (respondents 2 and 3 in this contempt case) filed W.P. No. 4317 of 1992 and inn W.P.M.P. No. 5411 of 1992, this Court passed an interim order on 30-3-1992 directing the District Educational...
Nutan J. Patel Vs. S.V. Prasad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ989
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. By order dated 20-4-1992 bearing No. 485/General. A/91-1 passed under S. 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (as amended) (for short 'COFEPOSA Act') read with G.O. Ms. No. 621, General Administration (General A) Department, dated 15-11-1990 of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Secretary to Government (Political), 1st respondent herein, passed an order directing that Shri Jayantibhai Rambhai Patel alias Jayantibhai R. Patel alias Jayant Patel S/o Rambhai R. Patel (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu') be detained under S. 3(1) of the said Act and kept in Central Prison, Hyderabad. The petitioner, wife of the detenu, filed this writ petition challenging the validity of the said order and praying to direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and for setting him at liberty forthwith. 2. On 1-4-1992 a consignment said to be of lead scrap in two containers in favour of M/s Dh...
S. Anji Reddy Vs. the Divisional Panchayat Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT146
ORDERSubhashan Reddy, J.1. This is a matter in which the petitioner, sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, was declared to have been ceased to be the sarpanch on account of nonconvening of gram panchayat committee meeting within the stipulated period of 90 days. The said order of cessation was suspended by this Court on 1-9-1988 and the said interim orders are in operation. In the impugned order itself the Divisional Panchayat Officer, Narasaraopet clearly finds that on the basis of the records of the gram panchayat viz., minutes book, agenda book and the members attendance register, that the petitioner did convene a meeting of gram panchayat on 2-8-1988 which is well within 90 days from 5-5-1988, as 90 days period would expire only on 3-8-1988. Under the provisions of the A.P. Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, a duty is cast upon the sarpanch of the gram panchayat to convene a committee meeting of the gram panchayat once in every 90 days. In the instant case the concerned officer referred to above ...
Government of Andhra Pradesh Through Forest Range Officer Vs. Chekuri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT147
Jagannadha Raju, J.1. This Writ Appeal is filed by the State against the dismissal of Writ Petition No. 11686 of 1989 by the learned single Judge on 23rd August, 1989. The writ petition was filed questioning the order of the appellate authority under the A.P. Forest Act, namely, the judgment in C.M.A. No. 31 of 1988 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Khammam.2. The facts pertaining to this appeal are not in controversy. Stated in a brief manner, they are as follows: The lorry ADB 7187 was seized at Aswaraopet on 17-8-1987 when it contained 19 rough square teak-logs of size of 0.583 cubic metres valued at Rs. 3,558-50. The forest officials found that teak-wood was being transported without the necessary permit. The action was taken under the A.P. Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970. After the enquiry, the Divisional Forest Officer, Khammam, came to the conclusion that the forest offence has been committed under Sections 20 and 29 of A.P. Forest Act, wilfully for consideration ...
N. Jayaraju and anr. Vs. K.C. Penchalaiah, District Educational Office ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT715
ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This Court by an order dated 31-1-1992 in W.P.M.P.No. 1176 of 1992 in W.P.No. 1037 of 1992 directed that the District Educational Officer, Krishna, shall not pass any further orders in regard to the change in the Correspondentships of the Schools run and managed by the Convenor, Education committee, C.B.C.N.C., West Vuyyuru fields, pending further orders on the Writ Petition.2. This contempt case has been filed on the allegation that contrary to the said direction, the District Educational Officer passed an order on 14-4-1992 approving the nomination of Correspondents made by the Convenor, Education Committee, CBCNC.3. It has been brought to my notice by the learned Govt. Pleader for Education that subsequent to the order passed in W.P.M.P.No. 1176/92, some of the respondents in the said W.P.M.P. (respondents 2 and 3 in this contempt case) filed W.P.No. 4317 of 1992 and in W.P.M.P.No. 5411 of 1992, this Court passed an interim order on 30-3-1992 directin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›