Andhra Pradesh Court June 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chirra Pulla Reddy Vs. the State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT559
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the dismissal of Writ Petition 3719/91 filed by the appellant herein seeking grant of additional benefits conferred by Central Ac 168/84 amending the relevant material provisions hitherto contained under the Land Acquisition Act. Additional benefits conferred are:(i) Payment of increased solatium viz., from 15% to 30%(ii) Payment of additional compensation at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act till date of taking over possession of the land or passing of a ward, whichever is earlier(iii) Payment of interest at the rate of 9% per amount for a period of one year from the date of taking possession of the land or passing of the award, whichever is earlier; and at the rate of 15% per annum after expiry of the period of one year i.e., from the second year onwards.2. Admittedly, in the instant case, notification under Section4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act wa...
P. Lala Sheriff Vs. Licensing Officer-cum-regional Transport Officer a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT718
M.N. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is the owner of an idle bus bearing registration No. MYK 6076 in respect of which a special permit under Section 88(8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was granted by the Licensing Officer-cum-Regional Transport Officer, Chittoor, the first respondent herein, on 22-8-1989, for a period of three days from 24-8-1989 to 26-8-1989 (both days inclusive) on the route Madanapalle, Salem, Tiruchirapally, Nagore, Pondicherry, Madras, Vellore, Kotayatham, Palamaner, Mulbagal, Srinivasapuram, Madanapalle. The vehicle was seized on the intervening night of 26/27th August, 1989 at 1-45 AM by the Motor Vehicles Inspector at Palamaner check post and in consequence of the check report a show-cause notice dt.31-8-1989 was issued to the petitioner calling upon him to show cause why the tax should not be imposed qua contract carriage for the entire quarter from 1-7-1989 to 30-9-1989 and also penalty thereon. In his explanation dt.19-9-1989, the petitioner stated that before ...
Sarada Bai and Others Vs. Smt. Shakuntala Bai and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP20; 1992(2)ALT660
ORDER1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India for declaring the order dated 6-12-1989 made in E.P. No. 3 of 1988 in O.S. No. 1932 of 1985 and the consequential order dated 7-3-1990 made in E.A. No. 23 of 1990 in E.P. No. 3 of 1988 by the IInd Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad regularising the unauthorised constructions in respect of the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-142/1 to 4 situated at Charkaman in Hyderabad city, as illegal and unjust and for setting aside the said orders, etc.2. The affidavit in support of this Civil Revision Petition is filed by the 1st petitioner. She states that she is the absolute owner of the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-131/7 to 9 situated at Charkaman in Hyderabad and that the said premises are siutated opposite to the premises bearing Municipal No. 21-2-142/1 to 4 on the other side of the road. The 2nd petitioner is the husband of the 1st petitioner and the 3rd petitioner is a tenant of ...
Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Chepur Ratnakar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT643; [1995]84CompCas465(AP)
Parvatha, J.1. In this application the official liquidator states that there was a delay of 33 days in filing Company Application No. 7 of 1989 and seeks condonation of the said delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 2. Company Application No. 7 of 1989 was filed on January 16, 1989, by the official liquidator against the two respondents herein under sub-section (1) of section 543, read with section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), alleging that they were guilty of misfeasance and breach of trust in relation to the company in liquidation, i.e., Kalpa Advertising and Marketing Company Private Limited, against which a winding-up order was passed by this court in Company Petition No. 9 of 1980 on February 20, 1981. The said company petition was filed on April 25, 1979. By virtue of section 449 of the Act, the official liquidator became the liquidator of the company from the date of the winding-up order. 3. In the affidavit filed in suppor...
The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada Vs. Bolem Srinivasa Rao Al ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: 1992CriLJ3027
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. The sole accused in Sessions Case No. 9 of 1991 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, was tried for the offence under S. 302, I.P.C. for committing the murder of Bolem Sai Babu, hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased', at about 4.30 p.m., on 14, April 1991 when the deceased was about to tap toddy from the palmyra tree of Bolem Raghavulu which is situated on the irrigation channel bund near the field of Kolli Ramakrishna Rao of Mudunuru village. On 23-3-1992 the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge convicted the accused of the said offence, sentenced him to death by hanging and referred the case to this Court for confirmation of the sentence. 2. The accused filed Criminal Appeal No. 292 of 1992 against the judgment of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, dated 23-3-1992. The accused will hereinafter be referred to as 'the appellant'. 3. The case of the prosecution is that there is a co-operative society of tappers in Mudunur vi...
Bakelite Hylam Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT240; [1993]202ITR145(AP)
S. Parvatha Rao, J. 1. The sole question in this referred case referred for the decision of this court under sub-section (1) of section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the assessee, i.e., Messrs. Bakelite Hylam Ltd., Hyderabad, is : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in holding that the assessee was not entitled to interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on Rs. 4,29,219 which was the excess amount of tax paid in the financial year 1971-72 (relevant to the assessment year 1972-73) over the tax determined on regular assessment for the assessment year 1972-73 ?' 2. It is covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this court in Kangundi Industrial Works (P.) Ltd. v. ITO : [1980]121ITR339(AP) against the assessee. However, when this referred case came up for final disposal on March 10, 1988, before G. Ramanujulu Naidu and Y. V. Anjaneyulu JJ., learned counsel for the a...
Jose Sabestian and ors. Vs. Computer Maintenance Corporation Ltd. and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT610; (1993)ILLJ374AP
ORDER1. The petitioners in this Writ Petition claim that they were appointed at Data Entry Operators on a permanent basis after interview, by the 1st respondent i.e., the Computer Maintenance Corporation Limited and that after they worked for two years continuously, they were removed suddenly in violation of the provisions of Section 40 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishment Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Rules, 1968 and other laws. Against the said termination of service, the petitioners 1 to 3 herein preferred appeals before the 2nd respondent herein i.e., the Authority under Section 41 of the Act, which were numbered as S.E. Nos. 265, 266 and 264 of 1982 respectively and by common order dated November 30, 1982 the 2nd respondent allowed the said appeals directing the 1st respondent 'to reinstate the petitioners back into services forthwith together with 30% of the average wages earned by the petitioners during ...
K. Sudheera and ors. Vs. Management and Staff Committee of the Kurnool ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-16-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT60
ORDERD.J. Jagannadha Raju, J.1. This writ petition is filed by five ex-employees of the Kurnool Urban Development Credit Bank Ltd. They pray for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate direction declaring the orders dated 27-4-1991 passed by the respondent terminating the services of the petitioners as null and void.2. The facts in brief are as follows: The five petitioners were appointed by the President of the respondent-society on the following dates: Petitioners 1,4 and 5 were appointed as at tenders on 26-3-1987. The second petitioner was appointed as L.D. Clerk on 27-3-1987. The third petitioner was appointed on 26-3-1979 as Bill-Collector. Along with the petitioners, one Butchanna was appointed as Attender and C.V. Raghavulu, S. Subrahmanyam and G.Hari Rao were appointed as Bill-Collectors and Abdul Khan was appointed as L.D.C. Bye-Law No. 26 deals with the service conditions of employees. Special Bye-law No. l contemplates that the appointments shall be made by the Presiden...
The Land Acquisition Officer and Sub-collector, Vijayawada and Etc. Et ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-15-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP8; 1992(3)ALT33
ORDER1. The State Government acquired two extents of lands in Bhavanipuram on the outskirts of Vijayawada town--(i) approximately 110 acres for construction of houses for middle and low income group people by the A. P. Housing Board; and (ii) acres 9-30 cents for providing house sites to members of weaker sections. In respect of the land acquired for construction of houses by the Housing Board, the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 02-4-1980, and the draft declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made on the same day. The Land Acquisition Officer, after taking into consideration 151 sale deeds relating to lands in the contiguity and of comparable nature covering the period 1977 to 31-3-1980, determined the market value of the land at Rs. 37,600/- per acre exclusive of the solatium and other statutory benefits. The claimants sought a reference to civil court under Section 18 of the Act contending that the market value should be determined at Rs....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›