Andhra Pradesh Court April 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Purna Bai and Others Vs. Ranchhoddas and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: AIR1992AP270; 1992(2)ALT495
ORDERBhaskar Rao, J.1. These two appeals, one preferred by the plaintiffs and the other, by the 9th defendant, arise out of the same judgment, and therefore are disposed of by this common judgment. The suit was.filed for partition and separate possession of the moveable and immoveable properties covered by the plaint schedules.2. The relevant facts in brief are : One Purandas had four sons and one daughter, namely, (i) Ranchhoddas, (ii) Dwarakadas, (in) Motilal, (iv) Babulal and (v) Yoga Bai. Purandas died in 1962. His fourth son, Babulal, pre-deceased Purandas while Dwarakadas, another son, died on 3-5-1966 leaving behind him the plaintiffs wife and two sons. After the death of Purandas, the eldest son, Ranchhod das, was managing the joint family. The family is a business family; the business being run in the name of Purandas Ranchhoddas & Sons. The family has perfume shop at Gulzar house, Hyderabad, and a medical shop at Sultan Bazar. Since the plaintiffs did not wish to continue the...
K. Gangadhar and ors. Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT580; (1993)ILLJ342AP
ORDERB. Subhashan reddy, J.1. These two writ petitions arise out of a common order passed by the respondent in P.G. Application No. 2 of 1986. The matter arises under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The said central legislation is a beneficial one providing a scheme for the payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines, oil fields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishments and the matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The dispute in the instant cases, relates to the payment of gratuity to the petitioners in W.P. No. 10233/88 payable by the petitioner in W.P. No. 14936/90. To avoid confusion and duplication, I shall refer the petitioners in W.P. No. 10233/88 as the workers and the petitioner in W.P. No. 14936/90 as the management. The workers are Beedi Rollers entrusted with the said work by the management. The Management has set up a beedi manufacturing unit at Bardipur within the precincts on Nizamabad. The workers are not only the...
Sri Brahmatantra Swatantra Parakal Mutt Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT292
ORDERY. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. The plaintiff-Mutt is the appellant. The suit is filed for a declaration that the plaintiff-mutt is a private religious institution not subject to control and management by the endowments department and for setting aside the order dated 24-9-76 of the Dy. Commissioner of Endowments holding that the plaintiff-Mutt is a Hindu Public Religious Institution within the meaning of the definition given under Section 2(22) of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 17 of 1966.2. The facts of the case in brief are: Srimad Abhinava Ranganatha Mandiram at Hindupur is a religious institution and a branch of the plaintiff-Mutt. During 1961 Sri Swamiji of the plaintiff-Mutt was proceeding on a tour and visited the Hindupur Mutt en route. The Swamiji having found that a large number of disciples of the Hindupur Mutt are interested in religious discourses and there was no proper place for their congregation felt the need for construction of a m...
State Bank of India Vs. Praveen Tanneries and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT353
Bhaskar Rao, J.1. The State Bank of India plaintiff is the appellant. The suit was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,90,760-19 paise against the borrower - 1st defendant and the guarantor - 2nd defendant. The 1st defendant was a firm carrying on business in tanned skins and hides. The plain tiff on execution of agreements by D-1, viz., Exs.A-1, A-7, A-14 and A-15 and guarantee bonds by the surety D-2 viz., Exs.A-2, A-9, A-16, A-21 and A-27 along with transfer endorsements in favour of the plaintiff Bank on the promissory notes executed by D-1 in the name Of D-2 by the 2nd defendant, viz., Exs.A-3, A-8, A-15, A-20 and A-26 agreed to advance monies to the 1st defendant under five types of schemes namely (i) Cash credit (mundi type), (ii) Cash credit (lock & key), (iii) Outward Bill overdraft, (iv) Clean Cash credit and (v) Cash credit (Mundi & packing type) the ceilings respectively being upto a limit of Rs. 60,000/- Rs. 40,000/- Rs. 25,000/- Rs. 1,00,000/- and Rs. 1,00,000/-. Thereaf...
Pragathi Nagar Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT1
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. The above two writ petitions are inter-connected. The sole petitioner in W.P.No. 3865/91 who is the proprietor of M/s. Vamsi Enterprises and who is impleaded as the second respondent in W.P.No. 18260/88 (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') has taken on lease a part of plot No. 61 in a locality called Pragathi Nagar Colony and applied for shifting of his business as a wholesale dealer in kerosene from a locality called Venkatagiri. He applied for licence and permission to the Commissioner of Police, Controller of Explosives, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and other authorities. The Controller of Explosives, Government of India, Nagpur and the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad granted permission. All the required formalities have been complied with by the petitioner. At that stage, the Pragathi Nagar Colony Welfare Association (for short 'the Welfare Association) represented by its President and three other residents of Pragathi Nagar Colon...
Agrimmcor Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT462
ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition questions the vires of Sections 5(2) and 7(3) of the ESSO (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1974, as being arbitrary and unconstitutional and to set aside the consequential letter of the 2nd respondent-Corporation dated 17-3-1987 seeking option of extension of lease for a further period of 10 years with effect from 1-4-1987.2. The petitioner is the owner of the site on which the petrol and diesel bunks were installed by the lessee i.e. Esso Estern Inc, a limited company incorporated in U.S.A. The lease period was 10 years with effect from 1-4-1967 subject to the condition of a renewal for a period of 10 years. According to the terms of lease, the initial rent for the first 5 years was Rs. 400/- per month which was increased to Rs. 450/- per month for the second five years. The renewal clause contained that it was subject to increase in rents @ Rs. 500/- per month, in case, option was exercised. Before the expiry of the lease per...
V. Subbarayudu Vs. G.M., Andhra Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1992
Reported in: II(1992)ACC718; 1994ACJ923
V. Neeladri Rao, J.1. All these four appeals were heard together as they arise out of a common order.2. The point that falls for consideration is: whether the father is entitled to claim compensation under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, along with his wife when their unmarried son died in a motor accident?3. The facts which give rise to this point are as under: V. Venkatachalamma (the appellant in A.A.O. Nos. 1301 and 1303 of 1991) was the wife of V. Subbarayudu (the appellant in A.A.O. Nos. 1034 and 1035 of 1991). They had a son Balasubrahmanyam, and a daughter, Valli Kumari. Venkatachalamma deserted her husband, Subbarayudu, and married Srirama Naidu on 2.8.1977. The children, i.e., Balasubrahmanyam and Valli Kumari were brought up by the father V. Subbarayudu. On 31.12.1984 at about 8.30 a.m., the A.P.S.R.T.C. bus bearing No. AAZ 5186 while proceeding on Tirupathi-Alipiri Road ran over Balasubrahmanyam and his sister Valli Kumari near Maternity Hospital. Both the bro...
Uttamdoss Vs. the Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT282
ORDEREswara Prasad, J.1. The petitioner prays for directions to respondents 1 and 2, the Government of A.P. and the Commissioner of Endowments respectively, to appoint him, or, in the alternative, to appoint the 4th respondent, as full-fledged Mahant, under Section 52 of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, with power to discharge religious and secular functions of Sri Swamy Hathi Ramji Mutt, Tirupati, till the rights of the 5th respondent as Matadhipathi are finally decided by competent courts.2. The petitioner claims to be the Third Disciple of the 5th respondent - Sri H.H. Devendra Dassji Varu, Mahant of Sri Swamy Hathi Ramji Mutt ('the Mutt for short). The 5th respondent was declared as mahant of the Mutt by the Supreme Court of India. Apart from the petitioner, the other disciples of the 5th respondent are, Sarjidass, Mohandass, Uttamdass, Satgurudass and the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent was appointed as interim mahant to look after the ...
Gadde Subba Rao and anr. Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Soci ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT608
ORDERSubhashan Reddy, J.1. The facts in this case are startling. It shows the gross negligence of the governmental officers, invested with important functions of acquiring the properties of the citizens and to pay the compensation therefor, as contemplated under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. May be, the acquisition is laudable as the same has been done to benefit the poorer sections of society for house sites enabling the people of lower strata to have shelter over their heads. But the petitioners whose lands have been acquired for the said purpose have to be compensated and they are entitled for payment of market value without unreasonable delay.2. In the instant case, draft notification and draft declarations under Section 4(1) and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act were published on 28-9-1977 and the possession was taken over on 4-8-1981 and the house sites were distributed to the landless poor on 13-8-1981 and the houses have also been constructed. But, as yet, compen...
Sri P.V.K. Satyanarayana Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-27-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP42
ORDER1. The petitioner in this Writ Petition seeks a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the Executive Officer of Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Varu Devasthanam, Srisailam (the 3rd respondent herein) issued in his Rc.No. C2/630/92 dated 27-3-1992 signed on 28-3-1992, informing him that the Commissioner, Endowments Department (the 2nd respondent herein) has not approved the lease hold rights for collection of broken coconuts in both the temples for the period from 1-4-1992 to 31-3-1993 granted in favour of the petitioner with directions to conduct fresh public auction, as arbitrary, illegal and unjust etc.2. The petitioner states that the Devasthanam conducted public auction on 18-2-1992 to lease out the right of collecting the broken coconuts for the period from 1-4-1992 to 31-3-1993 after sufficient advance publication and that the petitioner made the initial deposit of Rs. 10,000/- and participated in the said auction. He states that his bid for Rs.2,50,000/- was the highes...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »