Andhra Pradesh Court February 1992 Judgments

Bencdict, S/O Susainathan Vs. Prashant Cinema Air Cooled and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1992(1)ALT430

ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddy, J.1. The order questioned in the present Writ Petitions is the order of the Labour Court in Second Appeal Nos. 34, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 45 of 1982 dated 31-12-1985 in so far as the said order is against the Petitioners-workmen. The Labour Court confirmed the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, City Circle-II, Hyderabad, acting an authority under the A.P. Shops arid Establishments Act and dismissed the Appeals of the Management. The Labour Court held that the domestic enquiry conducted against the workmen was not valid in law and that the management did not seek for an opportunity to adduce evidence. The Labour Court agreed with the Shops and Establishments Authority that reinstatement need not be ordered despite the invalidity of the termination orders and held concuring with the view of the said authority that 30 month's compensation is proper. No holding, the three appeals filed by the management and the three other appeals filed by the work...

The Land Acquisition Officer, (Revenue Divisional Officer) and anr. Vs ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1992(2)ALT685

Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. These appeals and the revision petitions arise out of a common Notification issued on 25-8-82 by the Land Acquisition Officer, Rajahmundry under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, ('the Act' for brevity). On reference at the instance of the claimants, the learned Subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry, passed separate orders in different O.Ps. filed by the claimants. As these appeals and revision petitions involve common points and common questions of law, they may be disposed of by a common judgment.2. The District Manager, Food Corporation of India, Kakinada, has sent a requisition dated 23-4-1982 to the Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry (hereinafter referred to as 'the Referring Officer') for acquisition of 52.43 cents in Dowlaiswaram village and Ac.4.72 cents in Bommuru village of Rajahmundry Taluk, belonging to the claimants for the purpose of construction of godowns of 30 tonnes capacity for storage of food grains. Accordin...

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Komaravolu Lalitha

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Lakshmana Rao, President: 1. The Petitioner/Corporation issued an advertisement published in Eenadu Telugu Daily Newspaper dated: 19.03.1991 calling for applications for recruitment to five (5) posts of Stenographers. The respondent, herein, is one of the applicants. The Petitioner/Corporation conducted a pre-recruitment test for the purpose of selection of the candidates. The respondent herein was not called for the written test. At that stage, she approached the District Forum, Krishna at Machilipatnam. The District Forum passed an interim order dated 07.06.1991 that the respondent shall be permitted to appear for the pre-recruitment test to be held on 09.06.1991. She was accordingly permitted to Corporation filed a counter. After hearing both the parties, the District Forum passed order dated: 24.08.1991, the relevant portion of which reads as follows: Modifying the earlier order, the respondent is permitted to value all the papers including the paper of the complainant kept in the ...