Andhra Pradesh Court December 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. and Etc. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP195; 1992(3)ALT709
ORDERM.N. Rao, J. 1. Commonality of law and facts are the reasons that induce us to dispose of all these matters by this common judgment. Writ Appeal No. 1033 of 1988 was filed by the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, (for short 'the APPIC'), a State Government concern, against the judgment of a learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1700 of 1987 allowing the writ petition filed by twenty-six land-owners claiming themselves to be small farmers challenging the legality of the notification issued under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 16-12-1985 in GO Rt. No. 1281 published in the Gaxette on 3-1-1986 proposing to acquire Acs. 148.34 of land situate in Pera-maluru Mandal, Krishna District, for the purpose of extension of the Auto Nagar, near Vijayawada. The legality of the 4(1) notification was challenged on grounds inter alia that the substance of the notification was not published in the locality, the draft declaration under section 6...
T. Sunil Kumar and Others Vs. M/S. S.G. Edulgri and Sons and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP205; 1993(1)ALT364
ORDER1. This revision is filed under S. 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' by the landlords against the judgment of the Addl. Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad in R.A. No- 7/1987 reversing the order of the Rent Controller in R.C. No. 506/ 1979.2. The facts giving rise to the filing of this revision are in brief as follows: The petition schedule premises bearing D. No.9-1-47 situated at Sarojinidevi Road, Secunderabad originally belonged to one Rajamma Widow of Balaiah, The petitioners are her grandsons. She had leased out the property to the second respondent herein on monthly rental basis. It is a non-residential building. The second respondent had sub-let the premises to the first respondent who is carrying on business in the said premises. Rajamma executed a settlement deed in favour of the petitioners in respect of the suit premises on 31-3-1972. The petitioners filed a petition under S. 10(3)...
Smt. P. Syamala W/O Pasumarthi Madhusudana Rao Vs. S.V. Prasad, Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-1992
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT567
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. An order dated 9-6-1992 passed by the specially empowered Officer under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, hereinafter referred to as COFEPOSA Act, directing the detention of one Pasumarthi Madhusudana Rao, hereinafter referred to as the detenu, under Section 3(1)(i) and (iv) of the COFEPOSA Act, is challenged in this writ petition by the detenu's wife.2. On 19-5-1992 the detenu along with his son-Sekhar and cousin-Pasumarthi Sivaramakrishna @ Shivaji alighted from the train - Tirupati bound Howrah express - at Kaikalur railway station at about 5 a.m. The Officers of the Central Excise in the reasonable belief that the above three persons were in possession of contraband gold attempted to stop and check them. But the same was resisted by the three persons. With the help of one Durga Prasad, Assistant Travelling Ticket Examiner on duty in S.E. Coach, all the three were put back in the train. When the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›