Andhra Pradesh Court September 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madaba Ramaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT405; 1992CriLJ676
ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Gurasala, u/Ss. 397 and 401, Cr.P.C. by which the learned Magistrate cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner on 29-7-1991. 2. The petitioner along with his son were produced before the learned Magistrate on 30-4-1991 in Cr. No. 42/91 of Rentachinthala Police Station for an alleged offence under Ss. 324, 302 read with 34, IPC. The petitioner was remanded to judicial custody. As the prosecution has not filed the charge-sheet till 28-7-1991 i.e., 90th day after remand, on 29-7-1991 bail was granted on an application filed by him as the prosecution failed to file a charge-sheet within the prescribed time of 90 days as contemplated u/S. 167(2), Cr.P.C. Subsequently on the same day at about 5-30 p.m. the prosecution has filed a charge-sheet and on the next day they filed an application for cancellation of bail. 3. The learned Magistrate after hearing both sides cancelled the bail earlier...
Kouser Sultana Vs. Dr. Syed Mushtaq and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-1991
Reported in: I(1992)DMC553
Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. The 1st petitioner is the wife of the 1st respondent and petitioners 2 and 3 are their children. The marriage between the 1st petitioner and the 1st respondent took place on 14-1-85 at New Malakpet, Hyderabad. After a few months the 1st respondent and his parents and sisters started harassing the 1st petitioner. On 15-5-88 the wife gave a complaint to the police against her husband for illtreatment and after investigation the Police filed a charge sheet against the 1st respondent and others under Sections 498A and 406 IPC read with Section 34 IPG and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act before the Mahila Court, Hyderabad and the said case is still pending trial before the said Court. On 13-9-88 the wife filed an application for maintenance under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. PWs 1 and 2 were examined on behalf of the wife and the 1st respondent has examined as R-W1. The learned IV Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad framed Point No. 1 contended to be the wife of ...
Sadanala Bhogiraju and anr. Vs. Mandala Praja Parishad, Rep. by the Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT59
N.D. Patnaik, J.1.The defendant in the court of the District Munsif Kothapeta in O.S. 198/80 is the appellant in A.S. 13/91 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram and the defendant in O.S. 199/80 is the appellant in A.S. 12/91 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram. The appellate court confirmed the judgments of lower court and both the appeals were dismissed. S.A. 473/91 is filed by the defendant in O.S. 198/80 and S.A. 474/91 is filed by the defendant in O.S. 199/80. The plaintiff which is common to both the suits filed the suits for declaration that the defendants are not cultivating tenants and for possession of mesne profits. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants were only given the right to cut the usufruct of the coconut trees located on the Kowsika bund for a period of three years from 1-1-77 to 31-12-1979 and so they are only lessees. The plaintiff, therefore, filed suit for declaration that they are not cultivating tenants and for possession of co...
Alluri Surya Prasad and ors. Vs. Kalidindi Venkataraju and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT595
ORDERG. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. Consequent upon an observation made by the Subordinate Judge, Kovvur, while disposing of Interlocutory Applications in O.S. 92/88 filed by the petitioners herein, the defendant (first respondent herein) filed a private complaint against the petitioners before the II Additional Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Kovvur, alleging that the suit agreement was forged by the petitioners and thus committed an offence under Sections 465, 466, 468 and 474 IPC. The said complaint was taken on file by the learned Magistrate.2. Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently contends that Section 195(1)(b)(ii) Cr.P.C. is a bar for initiation of proceedings under Sections 466 and 467 IPC. and the observations are made in an Interlocutory Application only, and hence cognizance of offence under Sections 466 and 467 IPC is vitiated.3. When the suit agreement alleged to have been forged either prior to the filing of the suit or during the pendency o...
R. Dayananda Naidu Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Public Pro ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT641
G. Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. A complaint has been filed under Sections 467 and 471 IPC against the 2nd respondent herein before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madanapalle. The de facto complainant is one of the dependants in a Civil suit O.S.No. 51/83 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Madanapalle. That suit based on a promissory note was filed by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner and others. When the suit was posted for the evidence of the defendants, the plaintiff (2nd Respondent) withdraw the suit and the suit was dismissed by the learned District Munsif as not passed. The de facto complainant filed the complaint under Sections 467 and 471 IPC alleging that the 2nd respondent has forged the promissory note which was a discharged one and thus committed on offence. The said complaint was taken on file as CC.No. 186/89. Pending the said CC, the 2nd respondent filed an application Crl.M.P. No. 2829/89 stating that the said offences could not have been taken cogn...
B.G. Gopal Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ2991
ORDER1. The is a petition under section 482, Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 400 of 1988 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nellore. 2. The facts relevant for decision of this criminal petition are : The petitioner is the proprietor of Laxmi Wines, Anantapur. He had dealings with Sreenivasa Wine, Nellore (R.2 Sreenivasa Wines is the distributor of Macdowell liquors for various liquor shops and retail vendors. Sreenivasa Wines was dealing with Lakshmi Wines. Subsequently some disputes arose regarding the liquor supplied to Siddardha liquors, Anantapur. In this connection the petitioner filed a suit O.S. No. 8 of 1988 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Anantapur. In that suit apart from the partners of the Siddardha Liquors, Sreenivasa Wines and its managing partners were later impleaded as defendants 9 and 10. After the filing of that suit in connection with the business transactions and for supply of goods during 1985-86 the petitioner issued...
Maricherla Chitti Babu Vs. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, rep. by Its Hon' Se ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT385
ORDERD.J. Jagannadha Raju, J.1. This writ petition is filed by an employee of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan whose services were terminated for issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate direction on the ground that the proceedings No. BVB/T-5/91, dated 30-4-1991, issued by the first respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioner claims that he has been an employee of Sri Ramakrishna Vidyalaya, Sainikpuri, from 3-7-1978. The school was run by Rama Krishna Seva Samithi, a registered society. The school was affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education. In the month of June, 1989, Sri Ramakrishna Seva Samithi was merged with Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan and since then the school is known as Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan School, Sainikpuri. As the school is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education, the functions performed by the school are of a public nature and State nature. It comes within the meaning of' ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saleem Khan and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1991
Reported in: II(1992)ACC748; 1993ACJ181; 1991(3)ALT504; (1992)IILLJ377AP
1. R-2 in W.C. No. 49/87 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Rangareddy District Zone, is the appellant. This appeal was filed under Sec. 30, Workmen's Compensation Act (for short 'the Act') 2. R-1 herein (applicant in W.C. 49/87) was employed as truck driver on Truck No. ABT 2337 by R. 2 herein. When the said truck was driven on May 10, 1986 by the first driver, it collided with the lorry coming in the opposite direction and then R-1 herein who was on duty as second driver in the above truck and who was sleeping at the time of the accident, received multiple compound injuries on both feet and collar bone. Dr. S. C. Reddy, Civil Surgeon, Orthopaedics, Osmania General Hospital Hyderabad, certified that in view of the injuries sustained by R-1 herein, permanent physical impairment and loss of physical function is 50%. He also stated that R-1 herein is not fit to drive any heavy vehicle. 3. The lower Tribunal awarded compensation on the basis that it is a case of p...
M. Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. T. Jayamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-06-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT637; 1992CriLJ1368; I(1992)DMC146
ORDER1. This revision if filed by the husband challenging the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hindupur in M.C. No. 1 of 1987 awarding maintenance at Rs. 200/- per month to his wife from the date of the petitioner, namely 21-9-1986. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner challenged that portion of the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge awarding maintenance from the date of the petition till the date of disposal of M.C. No. 1/1987. 2. The facts leading to the filing of this revision are briefly as follows :- The petitioner herein and the first respondent were married on 27-5-1984 and they lived together only for two days. According to the first respondent, she was forcibly driven away from the house of her husband; whereas the contention of the husband is that she has voluntarily left the house and was living away from him by an agreement dt. 16-1-1984 which is marked as Ex. D-1 in this case. Both the wife and husband have executed a divorce agreement...
Kylash Potlia @ Shivaji and M.K. Dinesh Kumar Vs. the State of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-06-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT21
Eswara Prasad, J.1. Both these criminal appeals arise out of the judgment of the learned First Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Sessions Case No. 58 of 1988. The appellant in Crl.Appeal No. 932/90 is the first accused and the appellant in Crl.Appeal No. 933/90 is the second accused. Both the accused were charged with offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, for causing the death of the deceased Santabai Tiwari on the intervening night of the First / Second May, 1986. Both the accused were also charged with the offence under Section 380 IPC for committing theft of gold and silver ornaments etc., belonging to the deceased and her daughter during he same transaction. The learned Sessions Judge found A-1 guilty for the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and acquitted A-2 of the charge under Section 302 IPC. Both the accused were also found guilty of the offence under Section 380IPC-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »