Andhra Pradesh Court September 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Peeka Yesupadam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT636
Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. This appeal is filed against the judgment in SC 17/89 on the file of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Ongole, dt. 18-12-1989, acquitting the accused under Section 376 IPC.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: On 12-10-1987 the accused askedP.W.1 to follow him to the field with fertiliser bag and on the way the accused took her to a lonely place and asked her to keep the bag on the ground. After she kept the bag on the ground the accused caught hold of her and committed rape. On hearing, her cries P.W.2 came there and she also witnessed the offence. The prosecution in all examinedP.Ws. 1 to 8 and marked EXs.P-1 to P-8. The learned Judge found that no case has been made out and the finding is based on the medical evidence. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that if the evidence of the prosecution is Convincing, the question of seeking corroboration does not arise. But in this case the medical evidence does not corroborate with the versi...
Ade Babu Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1991
Reported in: AIR1992AP284; 1992(1)ALT183
ORDERPetitioners in all these writ petitions are aspirants for becoming commission agents in the market establishments under A. P. (Agricultural Produce andLivestock) Markets Act, 1966. At the time when the writ petitions were filed, they had not applied or obtained licences to act as Commission agents. Had they applied, their applications would have been considered under Section 7 of the above Act. Sub-section (4) provides the circumstances under which an application may be rejected. It is the case of the petitioners that had they applied, their applications would not have been rejected by the market committee under Section 7(4) of the Act. But the Government issued G.O.Ms. No. 289 dt. 2-5-1989 to the following effect:'O R D E R : In pursuance of the policy announced by the Government in the G.O. read above, the following notification will be published in the A. P. Gazette. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 32 of the A. P. (Agricultural Produce and Livestock...
Sri Kanaka Durga Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Financ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1991
Reported in: [1993]89STC88(AP)
S.C. Pratap, C.J.1. By this writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners seek to challenge the legality and validity the impugned notice dated 5th August, 1991, issued by the second respondent - Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, calling upon the petitioners to pay the arrears of sales tax dues in the sum of Rs. 1,38,995, and further informing the petitioners that till the said dues are cleared, registration certificate under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act') cannot be issued. 2. In the midst of contentions advanced by the petitioner's learned counsel, he submitted that the petitioners are now ready and willing to pay the entire sales tax dues as per the aforesaid demand, but requests that reasonable instalments may be granted in that behalf. Counsel appearing for the second respondent - Assistant Commercial Tax Officer submits that if the sale tax dues of the State are paid, there will be no objection to grant to the petitioner'...
V. Harischandra Reddy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Represented b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT362
V. Sivaraman Nair, J.1. Petitioners are operators of Contract Carriages in different districts of the State. The State Government published a draft scheme for nationalisation of contract carriages covering the entire State of Andhra Pradesh. The proposal is to exclude all private operators. Petitioners submit that the draft scheme which was published in the Government Gazette dated 19-8-1989 is illegal and unconstitutional. The reason for so contending is that Sections 99 and 100 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the 1988 Act) which apply to the publication of draft scheme and its approval in so far as they have conferred powers on the State Government to hear objections to the draft scheme proposed by it and to approve it are void and inoperative as also violative of the principles of natural justice. In the alternative they seek a declaration that Chapter -VI of the 1988 Act has no application to contract carriages.2. Counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that under S...
M. Subhan Vs. Maqbul Bee and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT603; 1992CriLJ2612
ORDER1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the husband against the order in Crl.M.P. No. 569 of 1988 in M.C. No. 34 of 1979 on the file of the Judicial First class Magistrate's Court, Hindupur. The wife filed a petition in Crl.M.P. No. 569 of 1988 claiming enhancement of maintenance from Rs. 125/- to Rs. 500/- per month. She pleaded that there is an increase in the income of the husband and her life has become costly and even for her absolute needs she would require maintenance of Rs. 500/-. 2. The husband resisted the petition on the ground that the various allegations about his income are not proper and that exaggerated claims are made in the petition. He took the plea that his wife was divorced long ago and as she is a divorced wife, after the passing of the Muslim Women's (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act No. 25 of 1986 it is not open to the wife to claim maintenance under S. 125, Cr.P.C. and Ss. 125 - 128, Cr.P.C. are not available to her. 3. After a very elaborate enquir...
T. Raja Reddy Vs. the Labour Court and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT424
ORDERA. Venkatarami Reddy, J.1. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed in M/s. Ampro Food Products Private Limited, Uppal, Hyderabad, 2nd respondent herein as Supervisor in the year 1976 and although he was disignated as Supervisor, he is workmen for all purpose. The 2nd respondent did not like the trade union activities of the petitioner and with a view to victimise him transferred him from the factory at Uppal to the head office at Caman Shahi. But the said order of transfer was not served on the petitioner. The petitioner fall sick on 15-12-1983 and was undergoing treatment from that date at the E.S.I. Hospital as an out patient and was not in a position to attend to the normal duties. While so, according to the petitioner, on 26-12-1983 one D. Ramesh, a co-worker in the 2nd respondent factory came to his residence and informed him that one P. Vasudev, the then president of T.N.T.U.C and the management of the 2nd respondent company required his presence and asked him to...
G. Israil and Etc. Vs. Govt. of Andh Pra and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-20-1991
Reported in: AIR1992AP90; 1991(3)ALT222
ORDERN.N. Mithal, J. 1. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought a mandamus directing respondent No. 1 to make a reference under Section 37 of the Land Acquisition Act.2. The relevant facts giving rise to this petition are that certain pieces of land belonging to the petitioner had been temporarily acquired for its use and occupation by the State under Section 35 of the Land Acquisition Act. There was some litigation in respect of compensation payable in respect thereof, which ultimately became final. However, at the time when the land was sought to be handed over to the petitioner, he made an application before the Collector pointing out that some quantity of earth has been removed from the land in question and consequently damage has been caused to it. He, therefore, prayed that a reference under Sec. 37 of the Act be made to the court. This application has been rejected by the Collector by an order dated 16th Nov. 1977, a copy whereof has been filed as Annexure I to the ...
Y. Srinivas and Others Vs. Osmania University and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-1991
Reported in: AIR1992AP227
ORDER1. These two writ petitions give rise to a common question and therefore are disposed of by this common order.2. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners-students who were trained in the 3rd respondent-minority institutes, seek for issue of a mandamus directing the Osmania University to permit them to appear for the B.Ed, Examinations for the academic year 1990-91.3. The facts alleged in both the writ petitions are almost similar with the basic difference that the minority institutes in W.P. No. 11719/91 is of Christians while in the other wri.t petition it is of Muslims. The petitioners in both the writ petitions had their admissions into the B.Ed. Course pursuant to an understanding given by the institute that the Inspection Committee of the Osmania University had a visit during the 3rd week of August, 1989 to their institutes and submitted a feasibility report to the University recommending grant of necessary affiliation. Subsequent thereto also, number of letters were addr...
Assistant Collector of Central Excises Rajahmundry Division Vs. Duncan ... Overruled
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ231; 1992(57)ELT545(AP)
1. Criminal M.P. 399/1991 is filed to grant leave to prefer an appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 161/1991) against the judgment dated 16th November, 1990 in C.C. No. 179/1986 in the Court of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad acquitting the accused. 2. The petitioner (appellant) filed the complaint against the accused for offences under the Central Excise Act and for criminal conspiracy. The gist of the allegation is that the 1st accused and the 3rd accused companies who were engaged in the manufacture of cigarettes at their factory at Biccavolu have committed evasion of excise duty payable on cigarettes with the help of the other accused. The trial court framed four charges. The 1st charge is under Section 120-B, I.P.C. r/w Sections 9(1)(n), 9(1)(bb), 9(a)(bbb) of the Central Excises and Salt Act against A-8 to A-31 and A-34 to A-40. The second charge is under Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(bb) r/w Section 9(1)(d) of the Central Excises and Salt Act against A-1, A-3, A-7, A-8, A-1...
Casken Tea Industries Ltd. Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing Director, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT64
V. Sivaraman Nair, J.1. Petitioner claims to be a Small Scale Industry It purchased Plot Nos. 138 to 141 in Medchal Industrial Estate. Those plots have been developed by the Industrial Infrastructure Corporation of the State. Petitioner had paid the value fixed by the Corporation. Accordinig to it, the amount spent by the Corporation on development of the land was also included in the price. After the purchase, it applied to Medchal Gram Panchayat within whose area the Industrial Estate lies for permission to construct an industrial building. That application was submitted on 1st September, 1981. It commenced construction thereafter and completed the same in April, 1982. On 24th November, 1982, 1st respondent-Hyderabad Urban Development Authority-issued a notice under Section 42 of the Andhra Pradesh Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 requiring it to demolish the unauthorised construction on the ground that it had not obtained permission as provided for in Sections 13 and 14 of the Ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »