Andhra Pradesh Court July 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guthikonda Sri Hari Prasada Rao Vs. Guthikonda Lakshmi Rajyma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT658; 1992CriLJ1594
ORDER1. This petition is filed under S. 482, Cr.P.C. challenging the order passed in M.C. No. 6 of 1986 which is confirmed in Criminal Revision Petition No. 79 of 1989. 2. The present petition is filed by the husband who has been ordered to pay maintenance to his wife and minor son. The record reveals that M.C. No. 6 of 1986 filed by R. 1 and R. 2 was decided ex parte. The order portion clearly mentions that the notices sent were not returned the notices sent by registered post were returned with the endorsement that the husband-respondent refused to take the notices. The Court deemed the service as sufficient and setting the respondents ex parte as he was absent, allowed the M.C. and directed payment of maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month to the wife and Rs. 200/- per month towards maintenance and education of the second petitioner minor son. The order was challenged in revision in Criminal Revision Petition 79 of 1989. The present petitioner claimed in the revision that he was not awa...
Veeramallu Venkataramayya Vs. Bathina Venkateswara Rao @ Pamarthi Venk ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT462
Eswara Prasad, J.1. The Appellant filed the suit for declaration of his title 'and for recovery of possession of the suit properties by virtue of a gift deed in his favour said to have been executed by one Narasaiah under Ex.A-1 dated 9-3-70. The respondent resisted the suit and contended that he is the adopted son of Narasaiah and that the alleged gift in favour of the plaintiff is not true, valid and binding on the defendant.2. The trial court decreed the suit holding that there was no adoption of the respondent by late Narasaiah and it was further held that the properties gifted under Ex.A-1 are the separate properties of Narasaiah. It was further held that the gift deed in favour of the plaintiff was true, valid and binding on the defendant. On appeal by the respondent, the judgment and decree of the trial court was set aside, holding that the respondent is the adopted son of Narasaiah, that the properties under Ex.A-1 were the joint family properties of late Narasaiah and the resp...
M. Yadagiri Goud Vs. Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Hyde ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT80
ORDERJagannadha Raju, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 45 of 1988 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB cases at Hyderabad. This petition is filed by A. 1 in the case. The facts relevant for decision of this petition are as follows:2. The petitioner was working as a permanent officer of Nagarjuna Grameena Bank which was incorporated under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. While he was working as a Branch Manager at Gattuppal Branch, the Chairman of the bank suspended the petitioner on 1-12-1981 for certain alleged irregularities said to have been committed by the petitioner while he was the Branch Manager. While he was undergoing suspension, he met with a serious car accident and received injuries which resulted in his left leg being amputated. While things stood thus, an F.I.R. was registered against him and three others on 16-12-1981 in F.I.R. G.No. 3/CDE/81. The time of the alleged crime was shown as prior...
The Excise Superintendent and ors. Vs. Vijay Krishna Wines Pvt. Ltd., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT376
Sivaraman Nair, J.1. These writ appeals arise from a common judgment disposing of writ petitions, 18367,18308,16430,19482 and 18300of 1988, respectively. Common questions arise in all these five appeals. The facts are also similar. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the writ petitions.2. The writ petitioners had applied for import permits for import of liquor from outside the State- from Punjab in the four cases and from Indore and Madhya Pradesh in the case, W.P.No. 16430/88. The permits were valid for different periods. Liquors were released from the distilleries manufacturing the same within the period of validity of the permits and they reached the State of Andhra Pradesh on dates subsequent to the date of expiry of those permits. In the four cases, the imported liquor reached Andhra Pradesh 11 to 17 days after 1-10-1988, whereas in W.P.No. 16430 of 1988, the imported liquor reached Salur check post in Andhra Pradesh on 1-10-1988. The petitioners had paid the counterv...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›